Impact of fiber source and feed particle size on swine manure properties related to spontaneous foam formation during anaerobic decomposition

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 202, Issue , 2016, Pages 84-92

  Van Weelden, M B ^a   Andersen, D S ^a   Kerr, B J ^b   Trabue, S L ^b   Pepple, L M ^c  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Feedstock composition; Foaming; Manure; Microbial community

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; MANURES; PARTICLE SIZE; RUNWAY FOAMING;

ANAEROBIC DECOMPOSITION; CRITICAL PARTICLE SIZE; DISTILLER GRAIN; FIBER CONTENTS; FOAM ACCUMULATION; FOAM FORMATION; MANURE STORAGES; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

METHANE; MANURE; WASTE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIODEGRADATION; DECOMPOSITION; FOAM; MANURE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PARTICLE SIZE; PIG;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; DECOMPOSITION; DIETARY FIBER; DIGESTION; FOAMING; FOOD COMPOSITION; GRAIN; INOCULATION; MAIZE; MANURE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PIG; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOYBEAN; STORAGE; SURFACE TENSION; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; DIET; METABOLISM; VOLATILIZATION; WASTE;

ANIMALIA; GLYCINE MAX; SUIDAE; ZEA MAYS;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; MANURE; METHANE; PARTICLE SIZE; SOYBEANS; SURFACE TENSION; SWINE; VOLATILIZATION; WASTE PRODUCTS;

EID: 84949895695     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.080     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andersen D.S., Van Weelden M.B., Trabue S.L., Pepple L.M. Lab-assay for estimating methane emissions from deep-pit swine manure storages. J. Environ. Manage. 2015, 159:18-26. 10.1016/j/jenvman.2015.05.003.
2. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington D.C. 20th ed.
3. Davenport R.J., Pickering R.L., Goodhead A.K., Curtis T.P. A universal threshold concept for hydrophobic mycolata in activated sludge foaming. Water Res. 2008, 42(13):3446-3454. 10.1016/j.watres.2008.02.033.
4. Clarke K.R., Green R.H. Statistical design and analysis for a 'biological effects' study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1988, 46:213-226.
5. Ganidi N., Tyrrel S., Cartmell E. Anaerobic digestion foaming causes - a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(23):5546-5554. 10.1016/j.biotech.2009.06.024.
6. Gates, R.S., 2013. Microbial Community Analysis to Identify Risk Factors in Manure Foaming. National Pork Board Report # 11-039.
7. Jarret G., Cozannet P., Martinez J., Dourmad J.Y. Effect of different quality wheat dried distiller's grain solubles (DDGS) in pig diets on composition of excreta and methane production from faeces and slurry. Livest. Sci. 2011, 140(1-3):275-282. 10.1016/j. livsci.2011.04.006.
8. Kent A.D., Yannarell A.C., Rusak J.A., Triplett E.W., McMahon K.D. Synchrony in aquatic microbial community dynamics. ISME Journal 2007, 1:38-47. 10.1038/ismej.2007.6.
9. Kerr B.J., Shurson G.C. Strategies to improve fiber utilization in swine. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 4:11.
10. Kerr B.J., Ziemer C.J., Trabue S.L., Crouse J.D., Parkin T.B. Manure composition of swine as affected by dietary protein and cellulose concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84(6):1584-1592.
11. Key, N., McBride, W.D., Ribaudo, M., Sneeringer, S., 2011. Trends and developments in hog manure management: 1998-2009. EIB-81. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Econ. Res. Serv.
12. Kougias P.G., Boe K., Angelidaki I. Effect of organic loading rate and feedstock composition on foaming in manure-based biogas reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 144:1-7.
13. Kougias P.G., Francisci D.D., Treu L., Campanaro S., Angelidaki I. Microbial analysis in biogas reactors suffering by foaming incidents. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 167:24-32.
14. Marcato C.E., Pinelli E., Pouech P., Winterton P., Guiresse M. Particle size and metal distributions in anaerobically digested pig slurry. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 99:2340-2348. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.013.
15. Masse L., Masse D.I., Beaudette V., Muir M. Size distribution and composition of particles in raw and anaerobically digested swine manure. Trans. ASABE 2002, 48:1943-1949.
16. Moody, L., Burns, R., Muhlbauer, R., 2009. Deep pit swine facility flash fires and explosions: sources, occurrences, factors, and management. National Pork Board. Des Moines, Iowa. Retrieved from: http://www.pork.org/filelibrary/NPB_Deep_Pit_Fires_Literature%20Review.pdf.
17. Moody L.B., Burns R.T., Bishop G., Sell S.T., Spajic R. Using biochemical methane potential assays to aid in co-substrate selection for co-digestion. Applied Eng. in Agric. 2011, 27(3):433-439.
18. NRC Nutrient Requirements of Swine 2012, Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, D.C. 11th rev. ed.
19. Owen W.F., Stuckey D.C., Healy J.B., Young L.Y., McCarty P.L. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 1979, 13(6):485-492. 10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5.
20. Oether D.B., De Los Reyes F.L., De Los Reyes M.F., Raskin L. Quantifying filamentous microorganisms in activated sludge before, during and after an incident of foaming by oligonucleotide probe hybridizations and antibody staining. Water Res. 2001, 35:3325-3336.
21. Pagilla K.R., Craney K.C., Kido W.H. Causes and effects of foaming in anaerobic sludge digesters. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 36:762-771.
22. Pepple, L.M., Gates, R.S., Funk, T.L., Kent, A.D., 2012. Microbial community analysis of liquid swine manure from foaming and non-foaming deep-pits. In: Proc. of International Congress of Agricultural Engineering Conference, Valencia, Spain, July 8-12, Paper Number C1353.
23. Rodriguez A., Lomas J.M. Transition of particle size fractions in anaerobic digestion of the solid fraction of piggery manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 23:229-235.
24. Ross R.D., Ellis L.M. Laboratory-scale investigation of foaming in anaerobic digesters. Water Environ. Res. 1992, 64(2):154-162. .
25. Trabue S., Kerr B. Emissions of greenhouse gases, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from pigs fed standard diets and diets supplemented with dried distillers grains with soluble. J. Environ. Qual. 2014, 43:1176-1186. 10.2134/jeq2013. 05. 0207.
26. Van Weelden M.B., Andersen D.S., Trabue S.L., Kerr B.J., Rosentrater K.A., Pepple L.M. An evaluation of the physicochemical and biological characteristics of foaming swine manure. Trans. ASABE 2015, 58:1299-1307.
27. Yan M., Kandlikar G., Jacobson L., Clanton C., Hu B. Laboratory storage simulation to study swine manure foaming. Trans. ASABE 2014, 57:907-914.
28. Yannarell A.C., Triplett E.W. Geographic and environmental sources of variation in lake bacterial community composition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2005, 71(1):227-239. 10.1128/AEM.71.1.227-239.2005.