A new tool called DISSECT for analysing large genomic data sets using a Big Data approach

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Canela Xandri, Oriol ^a   Law, Andy ^a   Gray, Alan ^b   Woolliams, John A ^a   Tenesa, Albert ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; POPULATION GENETICS; SOFTWARE;

COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEMORY; MODEL; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION MODEL; PREDICTION; SAMPLE SIZE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; GENOMICS; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84949883375     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10162     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Marx, V. Biology: the big challenges of big data. Nature 498, 255-260 (2013).
2. Matilainen, K., Mantysaari, E. A., Lidauer, M. H., Stranden, I. and Thompson, R. Employing a Monte Carlo algorithm in Newton-type methods for restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters. PLoS ONE 8, e80821 (2013).
3. Abraham, G. and Inouye, M. Fast principal component analysis of large-scale genome-wide data. PLoS ONE 9, e93766 (2014).
4. Aulchenko, Y. S., de Koning, D.-J. and Haley, C. Genomewide rapid association using mixed model and regression: a fast and simple method for genomewide pedigree-based quantitative trait loci association analysis. Genetics 177, 577-585 (2007).
5. Zhou, X. and Stephens, M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat. Genet. 44, 821-824 (2012).
6. Kang, H. M. et al. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 42, 348-354 (2010).
7. Zhang, Z. et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 42, 355-360 (2010).
8. Loh, P.-R. et al. Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts. Nat. Genet. 47, 284-290 (2015).
9. Lippert, C. et al. FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Methods 8, 833-835 (2011).
10. De los Campos, G., Gianola, D. and Allison, D. B. Predicting genetic predisposition in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 880-886 (2010).
11. Lango Allen, H. et al. Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature 467, 832-838 (2010).
12. Schrodi, S. J. et al. Genetic-based prediction of disease traits: prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. Front. Genet. 5, 162 (2014).
13. Wray, N. R. et al. Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 507-515 (2013).
14. Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J. and Goddard, M. E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-1829 (2001).
15. Visscher, P. M., Brown, M. A., McCarthy, M. I. and Yang, J. Five years of GWAS discovery. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 7-24 (2012).
16. Meuwissen, T. H. E. Accuracy of breeding values of unrelated individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41, 35 (2009).
17. Blackford, L. S. et al. ScaLAPACK Users Guide (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1997).
18. Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E. and Visscher, P. M. GCTA: a tool for genomewide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76-82 (2011).
19. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559-575 (2007).
20. Korte, A. et al. A mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies of correlated traits in structured populations. Nat. Genet. 44, 1066-1071 (2012).
21. Cebamanos, L., Gray, A., Stewart, I. and Tenesa, A. Regional heritability advanced complex trait analysis for GPU and traditional parallel architectures. Bioinformatics 30, 1177-1179 (2014).
22. Nagamine, Y. et al. Localising loci underlying complex trait variation using Regional Genomic Relationship Mapping. PLoS ONE 7, e46501 (2012).
23. Wray, N. R., Goddard, M. E. and Visscher, P. M. Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies. Genome Res. 17, 1520-1528 (2007).
24. Gilmour, A. R., Thompson, R. and Cullis, B. R. Average information REML: an efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics 51, 1440-1450 (1995).
25. Lee, S. H. and van der Werf, J. H. J. An efficient variance component approach implementing an average information REML suitable for combined LD and linkage mapping with a general complex pedigree. Genet. Sel. Evol. 38, 25-43 (2006).
26. Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer, 1998).
27. Daetwyler, H. D., Villanueva, B. and Woolliams, J. A. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS ONE 3, e3395 (2008).
28. Collins, R. What makes UK Biobank special? Lancet 379, 1173-1174 (2012).
29. Dudbridge, F. Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003348 (2013).
30. Chatterjee, N. et al. Projecting the performance of risk prediction based on polygenic analyses of genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 45, 400-405 405e1-405e3 (2013).
31. Su, Z., Marchini, J. and Donnelly, P. HAPGEN2: simulation of multiple disease SNPs. Bioinformatics 27, 2304-2305 (2011).
32. The International HapMap Consortium. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437, 1299-1320 (2005).