Modelling aboveground forest biomass using airborne laser scanner data in the miombo woodlands of Tanzania

Carbon Balance and Management

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Mauya, Ernest William ^a   Ene, Liviu Theodor ^a   Bollandsås, Ole Martin ^a   Gobakken, Terje ^a   Næsset, Erik ^a   Malimbwi, Rogers Ernest ^b   Zahabu, Eliakimu ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b SOKOINE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Tanzania)

Author keywords

k NN; LMM; Non parametric models; Parametric models; Prediction accuracy; Sampling design

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AIRBORNE SENSING; ALLOMETRY; BIOMASS; FOREST DYNAMICS; SATELLITE DATA; WOODLAND;

TANZANIA;

EID: 84949807905     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17500680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13021-015-0037-2     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Martin AR, Thomas SC. A reassessment of carbon content in tropical trees. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23533.
2. Herold M, Skutsch M. Monitoring, reporting and verification for national REDD plus programmes: two proposals. Environ Res Lett. 2011. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014002.
3. Joseph S, Herold M, Sunderlin WD, Verchot LV. REDD+ readiness: early insights on monitoring, reporting and verification systems of project developers. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8:034038.
4. MNRT. National forest resources monitoring and assessment of Tanzania mainland (NAFORMA). Main results. 2015. http://www.fao.org/forestry/43 612cf2f02c20b55c1c00569e679197dcde.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2015.
5. Burgess ND, Bahane B, Clairs T, Danielsen F, Dalsgaard S, Funder M, et al. Getting ready for REDD+ in Tanzania: a case study of progress and challenges. Oryx. 2010;44:339-51.
6. Tomppo E, Malimbwi R, Katila M, Mäkisara K, Henttonen H, Chamuya N, et al. A sampling design for a large area forest inventory-case Tanzania. Can J For Res. 2014;44:931-48.
7. Vauhkonen J, Maltamo M, McRoberts RE, Næsset E. Introduction to forestry applications of airborne laser scanning. In: Maltamo M, Næsset E, Vauhkonen J, editors. Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning- concepts and case studies. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 1-16.
8. Næsset E. Area-based inventory in Norway-from innovation to an operational reality. In: Maltamo M, Næsset E, Vauhkonen J, editors. Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning-concepts and case studies. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 215-40.
9. Hansen EH, Gobakken T, Bollandsås OM, Zahabu E, Næsset E. Modeling aboveground biomass in dense tropical submontane rainforest using airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens. 2015;7:788-807.
10. Ioki K, Tsuyuki S, Hirata Y, Phua M-H, Wong WVC, Ling Z-Y, et al. Estimating above-ground biomass of tropical rainforest of different degradation levels in Northern Borneo using airborne LiDAR. For Ecol Manage. 2014;328:335-41. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.003.
11. Wulder MA, White JC, Nelson RF, Næsset E, Ørka HO, Coops NC, et al. Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: a review. Remote Sens Environ. 2012;121:196-209. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.001.
12. Gobakken T, Næsset E, Nelson R, Bollandsås OM, Gregoire TG, Ståhl G, et al. Estimating biomass in Hedmark County, Norway using national forest inventory field plots and airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens Environ. 2012;123:443-56. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.025.
13. Gregoire TG, Ståhl G, Næsset E, Gobakken T, Nelson R, Holm S. Modelassisted estimation of biomass in a LiDAR sample survey in Hedmark County, Norway. This article is one of a selection of papers from extending forest inventory and monitoring over space and time. Can J For Res. 2010;41:83-95.
14. McRoberts RE, Andersen H-E, Næsset E. Using airborne laser scanning data to support forest sample surveys. Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning. In: Maltamo M, Næsset E, Vauhkonen J, editors. Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning-concepts and case studies. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 269-92.
15. Fassnacht FE, Hartig F, Latifi H, Berger C, Hernández J, Corvalán P, et al. Importance of sample size, data type and prediction method for remote sensing-based estimations of aboveground forest biomass. Remote Sens Environ. 2014;154:102-14. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.07.028.
16. Garcia-Gutierrez J, Gonzalez-Ferreiro E, Riquelme-Santos JC, Miranda D, Dieguez-Aranda U, Navarro-Cerrillo RM. Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variables using LiDAR. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2014;26:119-31. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2013.06.005.
17. Garcia-Gutiérreza J, Martinez-álvarezb F, Troncosob A, Riquelmea J. A comparison of machine learning regression techniques for LiDAR-derived estimation of forest variables. Neurocomputing. 2015.
18. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG. Introduction to linear regression analysis. New York: Wiley; 2012.
19. García S, Fernández A, Luengo J, Herrera F. Advanced nonparametric tests for multiple comparisons in the design of experiments in computational intelligence and data mining: experimental analysis of power. Inf Sci. 2010;180:2044-64. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.12.010.
20. Fox JC, Ades PK, Bi H. Stochastic structure and individual-tree growth models. For Ecol Manage. 2001;154:261-76. doi:10.1016/ S0378-112700632-0.
21. Tang M, Slud EV, Pfeiffer RM. Goodness of fit tests for linear mixed models. J Multivar Anal. 2014;130:176-93. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2014.03.012.
22. Galecki A, Burzykowski T. Linear mixed-effects models using R: a step-bystep approach. New York: Springer; 2013.
23. Salas C, Ene L, Gregoire TG, Næsset E, Gobakken T. Modelling tree diameter from airborne laser scanning derived variables: a comparison of spatial statistical models. Remote Sens Environ. 2010;114:1277-85. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.020.
24. Packalén P, Maltamo M. The k-MSN method for the prediction of species-specific stand attributes using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs. Remote Sens Environ. 2007;109:328-41. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.01.005.
25. Eskelson BN, Temesgen H, Lemay V, Barrett TM, Crookston NL, Hudak AT. The roles of nearest neighbor methods in imputing missing data in forest inventory and monitoring databases. Scand J For Res. 2009;24:235-46.
26. Ene LT, Næsset E, Gobakken T, Gregoire TG, Ståhl G, Holm S. A simulation approach for accuracy assessment of two-phase post-stratified estimation in large-area LiDAR biomass surveys. Remote Sens Environ. 2013;133:210-24. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.002.
27. McRoberts RE, Tomppo EO, Finley AO, Heikkinen J. Estimating areal means and variances of forest attributes using the k-nearest neighbors technique and satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 2007;111:466-80.
28. Beaudoin A, Bernier P, Guindon L, Villemaire P, Guo X, Stinson G, et al. Mapping attributes of Canada's forests at moderate resolution through k NN and MODIS imagery. Can J For Res. 2014;44:521-32.
29. Chirici G, Corona P, Marchetti M, Mastronardi A, Maselli F, Bottai L et al. k-NN FOREST: a software for the non-parametric prediction and mapping of environmental variables by the k-nearest neighbors algorithm. Remote Sens Environ 2012;45:433-42.
30. Penner M, Pitt D, Woods M. Parametric vs. nonparametric LiDAR models for operational forest inventory in boreal Ontario. Can J Remote Sens. 2013;39:426-43.
31. Gagliasso D, Hummel S, Temesgen H. A comparison of selected parametric and non-parametric imputation methods for estimating forest biomass and basal area. Open J For. 2014;4:42.
32. Bollandsås OM, Maltamo M, Gobakken T, Næsset E. Comparing parametric and non-parametric modelling of diameter distributions on independent data using airborne laser scanning in a boreal conifer forest. Forestry. 2013;86:493-501.
33. Leitold V, Keller M, Morton DC, Cook BD, Shimabukuro YE. Airborne lidarbased estimates of tropical forest structure in complex terrain: opportunities and trade-offs for REDD+. Carbon Balance Manage. 2015;10:3.
34. Latifi H, Fassnacht FE, Hartig F, Berger C, Hernández J, Corvalán P, et al. Stratified aboveground forest biomass estimation by remote sensing data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2015;38:229-41. doi:10.1016/j. jag.2015.01.016.
35. Næsset E, Gobakken T. Estimation of above-and below-ground biomass across regions of the boreal forest zone using airborne laser. Remote Sens Environ. 2008;112:3079-90. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.03.004.
36. Næsset E. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens Environ. 2002;80:88-99. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00290-5.
37. Huang W, Sun G, Dubayah R, Cook B, Montesano P, Ni W, et al. Mapping biomass change after forest disturbance: applying LiDAR footprintderived models at key map scales. Remote Sens Environ. 2013;134:319-32. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.017.
38. Chen Q, Vaglio Laurin G, Battles JJ, Saah D. Integration of airborne lidar and vegetation types derived from aerial photography for mapping aboveground live biomass. Remote Sens Environ. 2012;121:108-17. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.021.
39. Dewees PA, Campbell BM, Katerere Y, Sitoe A, Cunningham AB, Angelsen A, et al. Managing the Miombo woodlands of southern Africa: policies, incentives and options for the rural poor. J Nat Resour Policy Res. 2010;2:57-73.
40. Ribeiro NS, Matos CN, Moura IR, Washington-Allen RA, Ribeiro AI. Monitoring vegetation dynamics and carbon stock density in miombo woodlands. Carbon Balance Manage. 2013;8:1-9.
41. Haara A, Kangas A. Comparing K nearest neighbours methods and linear regression-is there reason to select one over the other? Math Comput For Nat Resour Sci (MCFNS). 2012;4:50-65.
42. Fehrmann L, Lehtonen A, Kleinn C, Tomppo E. Comparison of linear and mixed-effect regression models and ak-nearest neighbour approach for estimation of single-tree biomass. Can J For Res. 2008;38:1-9.
43. Baffetta F, Corona P, Fattorini L. Design-based diagnostics for k-NN estimators of forest resources. This article is one of a selection of papers from extending forest inventory and monitoring over space and time. Can J For Res. 2010;41:59-72.
44. Baffetta F, Fattorini L, Franceschi S, Corona P. Design-based approach to k-nearest neighbours technique for coupling field and remotely sensed data in forest surveys. Remote Sens Environ. 2009;113:463-75.
45. Ståhl G, Holm S, Gregoire TG, Gobakken T, Næsset E, Nelson R. Modelbased inference for biomass estimation in a LiDAR sample survey in Hedmark County, Norway. This article is one of a selection of papers from extending forest inventory and monitoring over space and time. Can J For Res. 2010;41:96-107.
46. Mascaro J, Asner GP, Dent DH, DeWalt SJ, Denslow JS. Scale-dependence of aboveground carbon accumulation in secondary forests of Panama: a test of the intermediate peak hypothesis. For Ecol Manage. 2012;276:62-70.
47. Asner GP, Mascaro J, Muller-Landau HC, Vieilledent G, Vaudry R, Rasamoelina M, et al. A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping. Oecologia. 2012;168:1147-60.
48. Asner GP. Tropical forest carbon assessment: integrating satellite and airborne mapping approaches. Environ Res Lett. 2009;4:034009.
49. Asner GP, Powell GV, Mascaro J, Knapp DE, Clark JK, Jacobson J, et al. High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:16738-42.
50. Vaglio Laurin G, Chen Q, Lindsell JA, Coomes DA, Frate FD, Guerriero L, et al. Above ground biomass estimation in an African tropical forest with lidar and hyperspectral data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2014;89:49-58. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.01.001.
51. Clark ML, Roberts DA, Ewel JJ, Clark DB. Estimation of tropical rain forest aboveground biomass with small-footprint lidar and hyperspectral sensors. Remote Sens Environ. 2011;115:2931-42. doi:10.1016/j. rse.2010.08.029.
52. Mascaro J, Detto M, Asner GP, Muller-Landau HC. Evaluating uncertainty in mapping forest carbon with airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ. 2011;115:3770-4.
53. Mauya E, Hansen E, Gobakken T, Bollandsås O, Malimbwi R, Næsset E. Effects of field plot size on prediction accuracy of aboveground biomass in airborne laser scanning-assisted inventories in tropical rain forests of Tanzania. Carbon Balance Manage. 2015;10:1-14. doi:10.1186/ s13021-015-0021-x.
54. Zolkos S, Goetz S, Dubayah R. A meta-analysis of terrestrial aboveground biomass estimation using lidar remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ. 2013;128:289-98.
55. Frazer GW, Magnussen S, Wulder MA, Niemann KO. Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-registration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of LiDAR-derived estimates of forest stand biomass. Remote Sens Environ. 2011;115:636-49. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.008.
56. Mugasha WA, Eid T, Bollandsås OM, Malimbwi RE, Chamshama SAO, Zahabu E, et al. Allometric models for prediction of above-and belowground biomass of trees in the miombo woodlands of Tanzania. For Ecol Manage. 2013;310:87-101. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.003.
57. LDC. Social economic profile of Liwale District Council. p 32.
58. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques, vol. 98. New York: Wiley; 1977. p. 259-61.
59. Anon. Pinnacle user's manual; Javad positioning systems. In: Jose S, editor. CA. 1999.
60. MNRT. NAFORMA field manual-biophysical. 2011. http://www.fao.org/ forestry/23484-05b4a32815ecc769685b21b03be44ea77.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2014.
61. Axelsson P. Processing of laser scanner data-algorithms and applications. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 1999;54:138-47.
62. Axelsson P. DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens. 2000;33:111-8.
63. Næsset E. Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Scand J For Res. 2004;19:164-79.
64. Lumley T. Leaps: regression subset selection. R package version 2.9. 2009. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=leaps. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
65. Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012. Open access available at: http://cranr-project.org. 2014.
66. Tsui OW, Coops NC, Wulder MA, Marshall PL, McCardle A. Using multifrequency radar and discrete-return LiDAR measurements to estimate above-ground biomass and biomass components in a coastal temperate forest. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2012;69:121-33.
67. Mallows CL. Some comments on C p. Technometrics. 1973;15:661-75.
68. Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Berlin: Springer; 2009.
69. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Berlin: Springer; 2000.
70. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. An introduction to statistical learning. Berlin: Springer; 2013.
71. Gregoire TG, Lin QF, Boudreau J, Nelson R. Regression estimation following the square-root transformation of the response. Forest Science. 2008;54:597-606.
72. Yoo S, Im J, Wagner JE. Variable selection for hedonic model using machine learning approaches: a case study in Onondaga County, NY. Landsc Urban Plan. 2012;107:293-306. doi:10.1016/j. landurbplan.2012.06.009.
73. McRoberts RE. Estimating forest attribute parameters for small areas using nearest neighbors techniques. For Ecol Manage. 2012;272:3-12.
74. McRoberts RE, Tomppo EO. Remote sensing support for national forest inventories. Remote Sens Environ. 2007;110:412-9.
75. Crookston NL, Finley AO. yaimpute: an r package for knn imputation. J Stat Softw. 2008;23:1-16.
76. Engelhardt A, Kuhn MM. Package 'caret'. 2009. http://caret.r-forge.r-project. org/. Accessed 7 Jan 2014.