Variability of image features computed from conventional and respiratory-gated PET/CT images of lung cancer

Translational Oncology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 524-534

  Oliver, Jasmine A ^a,b   Budzevich, Mikalai ^a   Zhang, Geoffrey G ^a,b   Dilling, Thomas J ^a   Latifi, Kujtim ^a,b   Moros, Eduardo G ^a,b  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPIRATORY GATED IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 84949801178     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19365233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF, Kamel EM, Korom S, Seifert B, von Schulthess GK, and Steinert HC (2003). Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med 348(25), 2500-2507 [PubMed PMID: 12815135].
2. Nestle U, Kremp S, Schaefer-Schuler A, Sebastian-Welsch C, Hellwig D, Rube C, and Kirsch CM (2005). Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 46(8), 1342-1348 [PubMed PMID: 16085592].
3. Erdi YE, Macapinlac H, Rosenzweig KE, Humm JL, Larson SM, Erdi AK, and Yorke ED (2000). Use of PET to monitor the response of lung cancer to radiation treatment. Eur J Nucl Med 27(7), 861-866.
4. Brunetti J (2011). PET-CT in Radiation Treatment Planning. Clinical PET-CT in Radiology: Integrated Imaging in Oncology. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 121-129 [Internet].
5. Bradley J, Thorstad WL, Mutic S, Miller TR, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, Bosch W, and Bertrand RJ (2004). Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(1), 78-86 [PubMed PMID: 15093902].
6. 18FDG-PET/CT for Treatment Planning and Follow-Up. Robotic Radiosurgery Treating Tumors that Move with Respiration. Springer; 2007. p. 55-60 [Internet].
7. Kumar V, Nath K, Berman CG, Kim J, Tanvetyanon T, Chiappori AA, Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ, and Eikman EA (2013). Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/CT is Greater in Clinical Practice Than Under Ideal Study Settings. Clin Nucl Med 38(3), 175-182 [PubMed PMID: WOS:000315049200016. English].
8. Nestle U, Kremp S, and Grosu AL (2006). Practical integration of [18F]-FDG-PET and PET-CT in the planning of radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the technical basis, ICRU-target volumes, problems, perspectives. Radiother Oncol 81(2), 209-225 [PubMed PMID: 17064802].
9. Chicklore S, Goh V, Siddique M, Roy A, Marsden PK, and Cook GJ (2013). Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40(1), 133-140 [PubMed PMID: 23064544. Epub 2012/10/16. eng].
10. El Naqa I, Grigsby P, Apte A, Kidd E, Donnelly E, Khullar D, Chaudhari S, Yang D, Schmitt M, and Laforest R, et al (2009). Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes. Pattern Recogn 42(6), 1162-1171 [PubMed PMID: 20161266. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2701316. Epub 2010/02/18. Eng].
11. Borst GR, Belderbos JS, Boellaard R, Comans EF, De Jaeger K, Lammertsma AA, and Lebesque JV (2005). Standardised FDG uptake: a prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 41(11), 1533-1541 [PubMed PMID: 15953716. Epub 2005/06/15. eng].
12. Fahey FH, Kinahan PE, Doot RK, Kocak M, Thurston H, and Poussaint TY (2010). Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium. Med Phys 37(7), 3660-3666 [PubMed PMID: WOS:000279845300019. English].
13. Zucker SW and Terzopoulos D (1980). Finding structure in Co-occurrence matrices for texture analysis. Comput Graph Image Process 12(3), 286-308.
14. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, and Dinstein Ih (1973). Textural Features for Image Classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3(6), 610-621.
15. Aggarwal N (2012). First and Second Order Statistics Features for Classification of Magnetic Resonance Brain Images. J Signal Inf Process 03(02), 146-153.
16. Duncan JS and Ayache N (2000). Medical image analysis: progress over two decades and the challenges ahead. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(1), 85-106.
17. Ganeshan B, Abaleke S, Young RC, Chatwin CR, and Miles KA (2010). Texture analysis of non-small cell lung cancer on unenhanced computed tomography: initial evidence for a relationship with tumour glucose metabolism and stage. Cancer Imaging 10, 137-143 [PubMed PMID: 20605762. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2904029. Epub 2010/07/08. eng].
18. Ganeshan B, Panayiotou E, Burnand K, Dizdarevic S, and Miles K (2012). Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival. Eur Radiol 22(4), 796-802 [PubMed PMID: 22086561. Epub 2011/11/17. eng].
19. Al-Kadi OS and Watson D (2008). Texture analysis of aggressive and nonaggressive lung tumor CE CT images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(7), 1822-1830 [PubMed PMID: 18595800].
20. Hunter LA, Krafft S, Stingo F, Choi H, Martel MK, Kry SF, and Court LE (2013). High quality machine-robust image features: identification in nonsmall cell lung cancer computed tomography images. Med Phys 40(12), 121916 [PubMed PMID: 24320527. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4108720].
21. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, Zegers CM, Gillies R, Boellard R, and Dekker A, et al (2012). Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 48(4), 441-446 [PubMed PMID: 22257792. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4533986. Epub 2012/01/20. eng].
22. Willaime JM, Turkheimer FE, Kenny LM, and Aboagye EO (2013). Quantification of intra-tumour cell proliferation heterogeneity using imaging descriptors of 18F fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography. Phys Med Biol 58(2), 187-203 [PubMed PMID: 23257054. Epub 2012/12/22. eng].
23. Vaidya M, Creach KM, Frye J, Dehdashti F, Bradley JD, and El Naqa I (2012). Combined PET/CT image characteristics for radiotherapy tumor response in lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 102(2), 239-245 [PubMed PMID: 22098794. Epub 2011/11/22. eng].
24. Leijenaar RT, Carvalho S, Velazquez ER, van Elmpt WJ, Parmar C, Hoekstra OS, Hoekstra CJ, Boellaard R, Dekker AL, and Gillies RJ, et al (2013). Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: an integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability. Acta Oncol 52(7), 1391-1397 [PubMed PMID: 24047337. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4533992].
25. Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M, Albarghach N, Pradier O, Metges JP, Corcos L, and Visvikis D (2011). Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med 52(3), 369-378 [PubMed PMID: 21321270. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3789272. Epub 2011/02/16. eng].
26. Tixier F, Hatt M, Le Rest CC, Le Pogam A, Corcos L, and Visvikis D (2012). Reproducibility of tumor uptake heterogeneity characterization through textural feature analysis in 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 53(5), 693-700 [PubMed PMID: 22454484. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3779464].
27. Cook GJ, Yip C, Siddique M, Goh V, Chicklore S, Roy A, Marsden P, Ahmad S, and Landau D (2013). Are pretreatment 18F-FDG PET tumor textural features in non-small cell lung cancer associated with response and survival after chemoradiotherapy?J Nucl Med 54(1), 19-26 [PubMed PMID: 23204495. Epub November 30, 2012].
28. Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB, Forster K, Aerts HJ, Dekker A, and Fenstermacher D, et al (2012). Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging 30(9), 1234-1248 [PubMed PMID: 22898692. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3563280].
29. Coroller TP, Grossmann P, Hou Y, Rios Velazquez E, Leijenaar RT, Hermann G, Lambin P, Haibe-Kains B, Mak RH, and Aerts HJ (2015). CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol 114(3), 345-350 [PubMed PMID: 25746350. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4400248].
30. Cunliffe A, Armato III SG, Castillo R, Pham N, Guerrero T, and Al-Hallaq HA (2015). Lung texture in serial thoracic computed tomography scans: correlation of radiomics-based features with radiation therapy dose and radiation pneumonitis development. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91(5), 1048-1056 [PubMed PMID: 25670540. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4383676].
31. Galavis PE, Hollensen C, Jallow N, Paliwal B, and Jeraj R (2010). Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters. Acta Oncol 49(7), 1012-1016 [PubMed PMID: 20831489. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4091820. Epub 2010/09/14. eng].
32. Cheng NM, Fang YH, and Yen TC (2013). The promise and limits of PET texture analysis. Ann Nucl Med 27(9), 867-869 [PubMed PMID: 23943197].
33. Leijenaar RTH, Nalbantov G, Carvalho S, Elmpt WJCV, Troost EGC, Boellard R, Aerts HJWL, Gillies RJ, and Lambin P (2015). The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis. Sci Rep 5(11075).
34. Nyflot MJ, Yang F, Byrd D, Bowen SR, Sandison GA, and Kinahan PE (2015). Quantitative radiomics: impact of stochastic effects on textural feature analysis implies the need for standards. J Med Imaging 2(4).
35. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Classification of Pulmonary Lesions. J Nucl Med 39(2), 91-99.
36. Yip S, McCall K, Aristophanous M, Chen AB, Aerts HJ, and Berbeco R (2014). Comparison of texture features derived from static and respiratory-gated PET images in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One 9(12)e115510 [PubMed PMID: 25517987. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4269460].
37. Kuykendall CC, Budzevich MM, Latifi K, Moros EG, Hoffe SE, Dilling TJ, Zhang GG, Montilla-Soler JL, and Eikman EA (2013). 4D PET/CT: Radiology Imaging to Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 3(2 Suppl 1), S28 [PubMed PMID: 24674534].
38. Boellaard R, Oyen WJ, Hoekstra CJ, Hoekstra OS, Visser EP, Willemsen AT, Arends B, Verzijlbergen FJ, Zijlstra J, and Paans AM, et al (2008). The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35(12), 2320-2333 [PubMed PMID: 18704407].
39. Dholakia AS, Chaudhry M, Leal JP, Chang DT, Raman SP, Hacker-Prietz A, Su Z, Pai J, Oteiza KE, and Griffith ME, et al (2014). Baseline metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis are associated with survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89(3), 539-546 [PubMed PMID: 24751410. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4372085].
40. Foster B, Bagci U, Mansoor A, Xu Z, and Mollura DJ (2014). A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images. Comput Biol Med 50, 76-96 [PubMed PMID: 24845019. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4060809].
41. Haralick RM (1979). Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture. Proc IEEE 67(5), 786-803.
42. Liang M (2012). 3D co-occurrence matrix based texture analysis applied to cervical cancer screening: Uppsala Universitet.
43. Kurani AS, Xu D-H, Furst JD, Raicu DS, editors. Co-occurrence matrices for volumetric data. The 7th IASTED International Conference on Computer Graphics and Imaging. Kauai, Hawaii, USA: CGIM; 2004.
44. GallowayMM(1975). Texture Analysis Using Gray Level Run Lengths. Comput Graph Image Process 4, 172-179.
45. Chu A, Sehgal CM, and Greenleaf JF (1990). Use of gray value distribution of run lengths for texture analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 11(6), 415-420.
46. Dasarathy BV and Holder EB (1991). Image characterizations based on joint gray-level run-length distributions. Pattern Recogn Lett 12(8), 497-502.
47. Tustison NJ and Gee JC (2008). Run Length Matrices For Texture Analysis.
48. Xu D-H, Kurani AS, Furst JD, and Raicu DS (2004). Run-length encoding for volumetric texture. The 4th IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging and Image Processing. Marbella, Spain: VIIP.
49. McBride GB (2007). Equivalence measures for comparing the performance of alternative methods for the analysis of water quality variables. New Zealand: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd.
50. Park SJ, Ionascu D, Killoran J, Mamede M, Gerbaudo VH, Chin L, and Berbeco R (2008). Evaluation of the combined effects of target size, respiratory motion and background activity on 3D and 4D PET/CT images. Phys Med Biol 53(13), 3661-3679 [PubMed PMID: 18562782].
51. Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM, and Wong TZ (2010). A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(2), 310-320 [PubMed PMID: 20651185].
52. Low DA, White BM, Lee PP, Thomas DH, Gaudio S, Jani SS, Wu X, and Lamb JM (2013). A novel CT acquisition and analysis technique for breathing motion modeling. Phys Med Biol 58(11), L31-L36 [PubMed PMID: 23640212. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3685480. Epub 2013 May 2].
53. Ion AL (2009). Methods for Knowledge Discovery in Images. Inf Technol Control 38(1), 43-50 [PubMed PMID: WOS:000264666200006. English].
54. Teo BK, Saboury B,Munbodh R, Scheuermann J, TorigianDA, ZaidiH, and Alavi A (2012).The effect of breathing irregularities on quantitative accuracy of respiratory gated PETCT. Med Phys 39(12), 7390-7397 [PubMed PMID: 23231288].