Psychometric evaluation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR)

British Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 207, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 551-555

  Williams, Julie ^a   Leamy, Mary ^a   Pesola, Francesca ^a   Bird, Victoria ^a   Le Boutillier, Clair ^a   Slade, Mike ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTRATION; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENGLAND; FACTOR ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ENGLAND; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84949787085     PISSN: 00071250     EISSN: 14721465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.161695     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anthony W. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehab J 1993; 16: 11-23.
2. Department of Health. No Health Without Mental Health: A Cross-Government Mental Health Outcomes Strategy for People of all Ages. Department of Health, 2011.
3. Leamy M, Slade M, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Bird V. A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry 2011; 199: 445-52.
4. Le Boutillier C, Leamy M, Bird V, Davidson L, Williams J, Slade M. What does recovery mean in practice? A qualitative analysis of international recovery-oriented practice guidance. Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62: 1470-6.
5. Shanks V, Williams J, Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Slade M. Measures of personal recovery: a systematic review. Psychiatr Serv 2013; 64: 974-80.
6. Sklar M, Groessl E, O'Connell M, Davidson L, Aarons GA. Instruments for measuring mental health recovery: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2013; 33: 1082-95.
7. Neil S, Kilbride M, Pitt L, Nothard S, Welford M, Sellwood W, et al. The questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR): a measurement tool developed in collaboration with service users. Psychosis 2009; 1: 1-11.
8. Law H, Neil S, Dunn G, Morrison A. Psychometric properties of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR). Schizophr Res 2014; 156: 184-9.
9. Slade M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, McCrone P, Leamy M. REFOCUS trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams. BMC Psychiatry 2011; 11: 185.
10. Corrigan P, Giffort D, Rashid F, Leary M, Okeke I. Recovery as a psychological construct. Community Ment Health J 1999; 35: 231-9.
11. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health QuaL Life Outcomes 2007; 5: 63.
12. Maheswaran H, Weich S, Powell J, Stewart-Brown S. Evaluating the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): group and individual level analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 156.
13. Muthé n L, Muthén B. Mplus User's Guide. Muthén and Muthén, 1998-2011.
14. Costello A, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 2005; 10: 1-9.
15. Lykken D, Tellegen A. Happiness is a stochastic phenomemon. Psychol Sci 1996; 7: 186-9.
16. Shepherd G, Boardman J, Rinaldi M, Roberts G. Supporting Recovery in Mental Health Services: Quality and Outcomes. Centre for Mental Health, NHS Confederation, 2014.
17. Williams J, Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutiller C, Norton S, Pesola F, et al. Development and evaluation of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2015; 50: 777-86.
18. McCabe R, Saidi M, Priebe S. Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191 (suppl 50): s21-8.
19. Andresen R, Caputi P, Oades L. Do clinical outcome measures assess consumer-defined recovery? Psychiatry Res 2010; 177: 309-17.
20. Burgess P, Pirkis J, Coombs T, Rosen A. Assessing the value of existing recovery measures for routine use in Australian mental health services. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2011; 45: 1-14.
21. Reininghaus U, Priebe S. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in psychosis: conceptual and methodological review. Br J Psychiatry 2012; 201: 262-7.
22. Crawford M, Robotham D, Thana L, Patterson S, Weaver T, Barber R, et al. Selecting outcome measures in mental health: the views of service users. J Ment Health 2011; 20: 336-46.
23. Slade M, Thornicroft G, Glover G. The feasibility of routine outcome measures in mental health. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999; 34: 243-9.