Career counseling for women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields

Handbook of Career Counseling for Women

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 427-452

  Fassinger, Ruth E ^a   Asay, Penelope A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949778803     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410617033-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: The AAUW report. New York: Marlowe.
2. Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist perspective. American Psychologist, 56, 781-796.
3. Betz, N. E. (1994). Basic issues and concepts in career counseling for women. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling for women (pp. 1-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Betz, N. E., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1987). The career psychology of women. New York: Academic Press.
5. Betz, N. E., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1993). Individuality and diversity: Theory and research in counseling psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 343-381.
6. Bienenstock, A. (2000, May). The scientific, technical, and engineering workforce for the 21st century: The federal perspective. Paper presented at the Chemical Sciences Roundtable, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
7. Bond, J. T., Galinsky, E., & Swanberg, J. (1998). The 1997 study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.
8. Carr, P. L., Ash, A. S., Friedman, R. H., Scaramuccii, A., Barnett, R. C., Szalacha, L., et al. (1998). Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129, 532-538.
9. Catalyst. (1992). Women in engineering: An untapped resource. www.catalystwomen.org
10. Catalyst. (1996). Making work flexible: Policy to practice. www.catlystwomen.org
11. Catalyst. (1999). Women scientists in industry: Making it in both management and technical roles. www.catalystwomen.org
12. Catalyst. (2000). Flexible work arrangements III: A ten-year retrospective of part-time arrangements. www.catalystwomen.org
13. Committee on Women in Science and Engineering, National Research Council. (2001). From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Crosby, F. J. (1991). Juggling. New York: Free Press.
15. Davis, S. (2000, May). An oddity no longer: Women scientists in the chemical industry. Paper presented at the Chemical Sciences Roundtable, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
16. Fassinger, R. E. (2001). Women in nontraditional work fields. In J. Worrell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender (Vol. 2, pp. 1169-1180). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Fassinger, R. E. (2002). Hitting the ceiling: Gendered barriers to occupational entry, advancement, and achievement. In L. Diamant & J. Lee (Eds.), The psychology of sex, gender, and jobs: Issues and solutions (pp. 21-46). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
18. Fitzgerald, L. F., & Betz, N. E. (1994). Career development in cultural context: The role of gender, race, class, and sexual orientation. In M. L. Savickas & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Convergence in theories of career choice and development (pp. 103-118). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
19. Fitzgerald, L. F., Fassinger, R. E., & Betz, N. E. (1995). Theoretical advances in the study of women’s career development. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 67-109). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Gilbert, L. A. (1992). Gender and counseling psychology: Current knowledge and directions for research and social action. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (2nd ed., pp. 383-418). New York: Wiley.
21. Hall, R., & Sandler, B. (1984). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, Program on the Status and Education of Women.
22. Hewlett, S. A. (2002). Executive women and the myth of having it all. Harvard Business Review, 80(4), 66-73.
23. Martell, R. F., Lane, D. M., & Emrich, C. (1996). Male-female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 51, 157-158.
24. Martin, L. (1991). A report on the glass ceiling initiative. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. http://www.mentornet.net
25. National Science Board. (2000). Science and engineering indicators: 2000. Arlington, VA: Author.
26. National Science Foundation. (2000). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2000. Arlington, VA: Author.
27. National Science Foundation. (2002). Science and engineering indicators: 2002. Washington, DC: Author.
28. National Science Foundation. (2003). New formulas for America’s workforce: Girls in science and engineering. Washington, DC: Author.
29. Pearson, W., Jr., & Bechtel, H. K. (1989). Blacks, science, and American education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
30. Pearson, W., Jr., & Fechter, A. (Eds.). (1994). Who will do science? Educating the next generation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Phillips, S. D., & Imhoff, A. R. (1997). Women and career development: A decade of research. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 31-59.
32. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Simon & Schuster.
33. Scantlebury, K., Fassinger, R. E., & Richmond, G. (2003, September). Grace under fire: Women chemists’ perseverance in and dedication to chemistry. Paper presented at the 226th American Chemical Society meeting, New York.
34. Scantlebury, K., Fassinger, R. E., & Richmond, G. (2004, April). There is no crying in chemistry: The lives of female academic chemists. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, Canada.
35. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
36. Sonnert, G., & Holton, R. (1996a). Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientist, 84, 63-71.
37. Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1996b). Gender differences in science careers: The Project Access study. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38. Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1996c). Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
39. Stokes, J., Riger, S., & Sullivan, M. (1995). Measuring perceptions of the working environment for women in corporate settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 533-549.
40. Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Wasserman, E. R. (2000). The door in the dream: Conversations with eminent women in science. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
42. Wharton, A. S., & Baron, J. N. (1987). So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. American Sociological Review, 52, 574-587.
43. Widnall, S. (2000, April). Digits of Pi: Barriers and enablers for women in engineering. Paper presented at the southeast regional meeting of the National Academy of Engineering, Georgia Tech University, Atlanta. http://www.womentechworld.org