An ontology matching approach based on affinity-preserving random walks

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2015-January, Issue , 2015, Pages 1471-1478

  Xiang, Chuncheng ^a   Chang, Baobao ^a   Sui, Zhifang ^a  

^a Peking University   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; GRAPHIC METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SEMANTICS;

COMPETITIVE PERFORMANCE; EFFECTIVE SOLUTION; EXTERNAL RESOURCES; HETEROGENEOUS ONTOLOGY; MATCHING CONSTRAINTS; RANDOM WALK PROCESS; SEMANTIC CORRESPONDENCE; STATE-OF-THE-ART SYSTEM;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84949745245     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Sivan Albagli, Rachel Ben-Eliyahu-Zohary, and Solomon E Shimony. Markov network based ontology matching. In Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1884-1889. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2009.
2. Michelle Cheatham and Pascal Hitzler. String similarity metrics for ontology alignment. In The Semantic Web-ISWC 2013, pages 294-309. Springer, 2013.
3. Minsu Cho, Jungmin Lee, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Reweighted random walks for graph matching. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer Vision: Part V, ECCV'10, pages 492-505, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag.
4. AnHai Doan, Jayant Madhavan, Robin Dhamankar, Pedro Domingos, and Alon Halevy. Learning to match ontologies on the semantic web. The VLDB JournalThe International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, 12(4):303-319, 2003.
5. Kai Eckert, Christian Meilicke, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt. Improving ontology matching using meta-level learning. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pages 158-172. Springer, 2009.
6. Jérôme Euzenat and Pavel Shvaiko. Ontology matching. 2013.
7. Avigdor Gal. Uncertain schema matching. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management, 3(1):1-97, 2011.
8. Taher H. Haveliwala. Topic-sensitive pagerank. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, www '02, pages 517-526, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.
9. Andreas He. An iterative algorithm for ontology mapping capable of using training data, 2006.
10. John E Hopcroft and Richard M Karp. An n5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs. SIAM Journal on computing, 2(4):225-231, 1973.
11. Wei Hu, Ningsheng Jian, Yuzhong Qu, and Yanbing Wang. Gmo: A graph matching for ontologies. In Proceedings of K-CAP Workshop on Integrating Ontologies, pages 41-48, 2005.
12. Jakob Huber, Timo Sztyler, Jan Noessner, and Christian Meilicke. Codi: Combinatorial optimization for data integration-results for oaei 2011. Ontology Matching, page 134, 2011.
13. Fatsuma Jauro, S B Junaidu, and S E Abdullahi. Falconao++: An improved ontology alignment system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 94(2):1-7, 2014.
14. Jon M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM, 46(5):604-632, September 1999.
15. Amy N. Langville and Carl D. Meyer. Deeper inside pagerank. Internet Mathematics, 1:2004, 2004.
16. Juanzi Li, Jie Tang, Yi Li, and Qiong Luo. Rimom: A dynamic multistrategy ontology alignment framework. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 21(8):1218-1232, 2009.
17. Ming Mao, Yefei Peng, and Michael Spring. An adaptive ontology mapping approach with neural network based constraint satisfaction. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 8(1):14-25, 2010.
18. Ming Mao, Yefei Peng, and Michael Spring. Ontology mapping: as a binary classification problem. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 23(9):1010-1025, 2011.
19. Sergey Melnik, Hector Garcia-Molina, and Erhard Rahm. Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In Data Engineering, 2002. Proceedings. 18th International Conference on, pages 117-128. IEEE, 2002.
20. DuyHoa Ngo, Zohra Bellahsene, and Remi Coletta. A flexible system for ontology matching. In IS Olympics: Information Systems in a Diverse World, pages 79-94. Springer, 2012.
21. DuyHoa Ngo, Zohra Bellahsene, et al. Yam++-a combination of graph matching and machine learning approach to ontology alignment task. Journal of Web Semantics, 16, 2012.
22. Mathias Niepert, Christian Meilicke, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt. A probabilistic-logical framework for ontology matching. In AAAI. Citeseer, 2010.
23. Natalya F Noy and Mark A Musen. Anchor-prompt: Using non-local context for semantic matching. In Proceedings of the workshop on ontologies and information sharing at the international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI), pages 63-70, 2001.
24. Lawrence Page, Sergey Brin, Rajeev Motwani, and Terry Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical Report 1999-66, Stanford InfoLab, November 1999. Previous number = SIDL-WP-1999-0120.
25. Yuzhong Qu, Wei Hu, and Gong Cheng. Constructing virtual documents for ontology matching. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web (www), pages 23-31. ACM, 2006.
26. Eugene Seneta. Non-negative matrices and Markov chains. Springer, 2006.
27. Pavel Shvaiko and Jérôme Euzenat. Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 25(1):158-176, 2013.
28. Vassilis Spiliopoulos, George A Vouros, and Vangelis Karkaletsis. On the discovery of subsumption relations for the alignment of ontologies. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 8(1):69-88, 2010.
29. Willem Robert Van Hage, Antoine Isaac, and Zharko Aleksovski. Sample evaluation of ontology-matching systems. In EON, volume 2007, pages 41-50, 2007.