Establishing communication systems without explicit meaning transmission

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2159, Issue , 2001, Pages 381-390

  Smith, Andrew D M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

COMMUNICATIVE SYSTEMS; ERROR FEEDBACK; EXPLICIT MEANINGS; HUMAN LANGUAGE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84949740161     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44811-x_41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. J. Batali. Innate biases and critical periods: Combining evolution and learning in the acquisition of syntax. In R. Brooks and P. Maes, editors, Artificial Life 4: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, pages 160-171. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1994.
2. J. Batali. The negotiation and acquisition of recursive grammars as a result of competition among exemplars. In E. Briscoe, editor, Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
3. Paul Bloom. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. MIT Press, 2000.
4. E. Briscoe. Grammatical acquisition: Inductive bias and coevolution of language and the language acquisition device. Language, 76(2):245-296, 2000.
5. D. Cheney and R. Seyfarth. How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1990.
6. Edwin D. de Jong. Autonomous Formation of Concepts and Communication. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2000.
7. S. Harnad. The symbol grounding problem. Physica, D 42:335-346, 1990.
8. James R. Hurford. The evolution of critical period for language acquisition. Cognition, 40:159-201, 1991.
9. S. Kirby. Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax. In Ted Briscoe, editor, Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
10. V. Kvasnička and J. Pospíchal. An emergence of coordinated communication in populations of agents. Artificial Life, 5(4):319-342, 1999.
11. Barbara Landau, Linda B. Smith, and Susan S. Jones. The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3:299-321, 1988.
12. E. M. Markman. Categorization and naming in children. MIT Press, 1989.
13. John Maynard Smith and Eörs Szathmáry. The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, 1995.
14. Chrystopher L. Nehaniv. The making of meaning in societies: Semiotic and information-theoretic background to the evolution of communication. In Proceedings of the AISB Symposium: Starting from Society — the application of social analogies to computational systems, 19-20 April 200, pages 73-84, 2000.
15. M. Oliphant. The learning barrier: Moving from innate to learned systems of communication. Adaptive Behavior, 7(3/4):371-384, 1999.
16. M. Oliphant and J. Batali. Learning and the emergence of coordinated communication. Center for Research on Language Newsletter, 11(1), 1997.
17. W. V. Quine. Word and Object. MIT Press, 1960.
18. A. D. M. Smith. The role of shared meaning structure in communication. Paper given at the 7th Human Behaviour & Evolution Society Conference, London, 2001.
19. L. Steels. Perceptually grounded meaning creation. In M. Tokoro, editor, Proceedings of the international conference on multi-agent systems. MIT Press, 1996.
20. L. Steels. The Talking Heads Experiment, volume I. Words and Meanings. Laboratorium, Antwerpen, 1999. Special pre-edition.
21. J. R. Taylor. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford University Press, 1995.