Digital pathology: Elementary, rapid and reliable automated image analysis

Histopathology

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 888-896

  Bouzin, Caroline ^a   Saini, Monika L ^b   Khaing, Kyi Kyi ^b   Ambroise, Jérôme ^a   Marbaix, Etienne ^b   Grégoire, Vincent ^a   Bol, Vanesa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Automation; Biological markers; Digital pathology; Image analysis; Immunohistochemistry; Prognosis; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL COUNTING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; TISSUE SECTION; CARCINOMA; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; THYROID NEOPLASMS;

TUMOR MARKER;

BIOMARKERS, TUMOR; CARCINOMA; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THYROID NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84949659661     PISSN: 03090167     EISSN: 13652559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/his.12867     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ghaznavi F, Evans A, Madabhushi A, Feldman M. Digital imaging in pathology: whole-slide imaging and beyond. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2013; 8; 331-359.
2. Webster JD, Dunstan RW. Whole-slide imaging and automated image analysis: considerations and opportunities in the practice of pathology. Vet. Pathol. 2014; 51; 211-223.
3. Kayser G, Kayser K. Quantitative pathology in virtual microscopy: history, applications, perspectives. Acta Histochem. 2013; 115; 527-532.
4. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2014; 138; 241-256.
5. Diaz LK, Sahin A, Sneige N. Interobserver agreement for estrogen receptor immunohistochemical analysis in breast cancer: a comparison of manual and computer-assisted scoring methods. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2004; 8; 23-27.
6. Lejeune M, Jaen J, Pons L et al. Quantification of diverse subcellular immunohistochemical markers with clinicobiological relevancies: validation of a new computer-assisted image analysis procedure. J. Anat. 2008; 212; 868-878.
7. Hamilton PW, Bankhead P, Wang Y et al. Digital pathology and image analysis in tissue biomarker research. Methods 2014; 70; 59-73.
8. Shinde V, Burke KE, Chakravarty A et al. Applications of pathology-assisted image analysis of immunohistochemistry-based biomarkers in oncology. Vet. Pathol. 2014; 51; 292-303.
9. Galon J, Bindea G, Mlecnik B et al. Intratumoural immune microenvironment and survival: the immunoscore. Med. Sci. (Paris) 2014; 30; 439-444.
10. Halama N, Michel S, Kloor M et al. Localization and density of immune cells in the invasive margin of human colorectal cancer liver metastases are prognostic for response to chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2011; 71; 5670-5677.
11. Liao JJ, Lewis JW. A note on concordance correlation coefficient. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2000; 5; 23-26.
12. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45; 255-268.
13. Yee NS, Li Q, Kazi AA, Yang Z, Berg A, Yee RK. Aberrantly over-expressed TRPM8 channels in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: correlation with tumour size/stage and requirement for cancer cells invasion. Cells 2014; 3; 500-516.
14. Middleton LP, Feeley TW, Albright HW, Walters R, Hamilton SH. Second-opinion pathologic review is a patient safety mechanism that helps reduce error and decrease waste. J. Oncol. Pract. 2014; 10; 275-280.
15. Soofi Y, Khoury T. Inter-institutional pathology consultation: the importance of breast pathology subspecialization in a setting of tertiary cancer center. Breast J. 2015; 21; 337-344.
16. Elmore JG, Longton GM, Carney PA et al. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. JAMA 2015; 313; 1122-1132.
17. Rizzardi AE, Johnson AT, Vogel RI et al. Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring. Diagn. Pathol. 2012; 7; 42.
18. Pantanowitz L, Sinard JH, Henricks WH et al. Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2013; 137; 1710-1722.
19. Neumeister VM, Parisi F, England AM et al. A tissue quality index: an intrinsic control for measurement of effects of preanalytical variables on FFPE tissue. Lab. Invest. 2014; 94; 467-474.
20. Yildiz-Aktas IZ, Dabbs DJ, Bhargava R. The effect of cold ischemic time on the immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression in invasive breast carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2012; 25; 1098-1105.
21. Gray A, Wright A, Jackson P, Hale M, Treanor D. Quantification of histochemical stains using whole slide imaging: development of a method and demonstration of its usefulness in laboratory quality control. J. Clin. Pathol. 2014; 68; 192-199.
22. Decaestecker C, Lopez XM, D'Haene N et al. Requirements for the valid quantification of immunostains on tissue microarray materials using image analysis. Proteomics 2009; 9; 4478-4494.
23. Khan AM, Rajpoot N, Treanor D, Magee D. A nonlinear mapping approach to stain normalization in digital histopathology images using image-specific color deconvolution. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2014; 61; 1729-1738.