Similarities and contrasts of complexity, uncertainty, risks, and resilience in supply chains and temporary multi-organization projects

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1328-1346

  Thomé, Antônio Márcio Tavares ^a   Scavarda, Luiz Felipe ^a   Scavarda, Annibal ^b   Thomé, Felipe Eduardo Sydio de Souza ^c  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^c Project Management Department   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Literature review; Operations management; Project management; Research synthesis; Supply chain collaboration

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; CROSS FERTILIZATION; LITERATURE REVIEWS; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH SYNTHESIS; SUPPLY CHAIN COLLABORATION; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTS (SCM); TEMPORARY MULTI ORGANIZATIONS;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

COMPLEXITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH WORK; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84949635202     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Alfalla-Luque, R., Medina-López, C., Supply chain management: unheard of in the 1970s, core to today's company. Bus. Hist. 2 (2009), 202–221.
2. Atkinson, R., Crawford, L., Ward, S., Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 24:8 (2006), 687–698.
3. Baccarini, D., The concept of project complexity: a review. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 14:4 (1996), 201–204.
4. Barki, H., Rivard, S., Talbot, J., Toward an assessment of software development risk. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 10:2 (1993), 203–225.
5. Bhamra, R., Dani, S., Bunard, K., Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49:18 (2011), 5375–5393.
6. Blackstone, J.H., APICS Dictionary. 14th.ed, 2013, APICS, Chicago, USA.
7. Boehm, B.W., Port, D., Yang, Y., Bhuta, J., Not all CBS are created equally: COTS-intensive project types. Erdogmus, Hakan, Weng, Tao, (eds.) COTS-Based Software Systems. Proceedings of the Second International Conference, ICCBSS, Ottawa, Canada, February 10–12, 2003, Springer.
8. Bredillet, C.N., Exploring research in project management—nine schools of project management research (Part 6). Proj. Manag. J. 39:3 (2008), 2–5.
9. Bredillet, C.N., Blowing hot and cold on project management. Proj. Manag. J. 41:3 (2010), 4–20.
10. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., Laville, F., Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22:1 (1991), 155–205.
11. Chopra, S., Sodhi, M.S., Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 46:1 (2004), 53–61.
12. Christopher, M., Peck, H., Building the resilient supply chain. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 15:2 (2004), 1–14.
13. Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Science mapping software tools: review, analysis and cooperative study among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62:7 (2011), 1382–1402, 10.1002/asi.21525.
14. Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., SciMAT: a new science mapping analysis software tool. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63:8 (2012), 1609–1630.
15. Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., A note on the ITS topic evolution in the period 2000–2009 at T-ITS. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 13:1 (2012), 413–420.
16. Colicchia, C., Strozzi, F., Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J. 17:4 (2012), 403–418.
17. Cooper, H.M., Research synthesis and meta-analysis. A Step-by-Step Approach, fouth ed, 2010, Sage, Thousand Oaks, USA.
18. Craighead, C.W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M.J., Handfield, R.B., The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decis. Sci. 38:1 (2007), 131–156.
19. Cranfield University, Creating Resilient Supply Chain: A Practical Guide. Centre for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2003, Cranfield University, UK.
20. De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., Bagatelj, V., Exploratory Network Analysis with Pajek. 2005, Cambridge University Press, U.K.
21. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., Producing a systematic review. Buchanan, D., Bryman, A., (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, 2009, Sage Publications, London, 671–689.
22. Eckmann, B., Sur les applications d'un polyèdre dans un espace projectif complexe. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 228:18 (1949), 1397–1399.
23. Fahimnia, B., Tang, C.S., Davarzani, H., Sarkis, J., Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 247:1 (2015), 1–15, 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.034.
24. Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., Williams, T., Now, let's make it really complex (complicated). Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 31:9 (2011), 966–990.
25. Ghadge, A., Dani, S., Kalawsky, R., Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 23:3 (2012), 313–339.
26. Giezen, M., Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30 (2012), 781–790.
27. Glock, C.H., Grosse, E.H., Ries, J.M., The lot sizing problem: a tertiary study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 155:C (2014), 39–51.
28. Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R., The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J. Financ. Econ. 60:2 (2001), 187–243.
29. Greenhalgh, T., Peacock, R., Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 331:7524 (2005), 1064–1065, 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68.
30. Griffin, A., Hauser, J.R., Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 13:3 (1996), 191–215.
31. Harland, C., Brenchley, R., Walker, H., Risk in supply networks. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 9 (2003), 51–62, 10.1016/S1478-4092(03)00004-9.
32. Heckmann, I., Comes, T., Nickel, S., A critical review on supply chain risk—definition, measure and modelling. Omega 52 (2015), 119–132, 10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004.
33. Hirsch, J.E., An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:46 (2005), 16569–16572, 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
34. Hjørland, B., Citation analysis: a social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Inf. Process. Manag. 49 (2013), 1313–1325, 10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001.
35. Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., Talluri, S., Supply chain risk management: a literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53:16 (2015), 5031–5069, 10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467.
36. Hohenstein, N., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: a systematic review and paths for further investigation. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 45:1/2 (2015), 90–117.
37. Hollman, R.L., Scavarda, L.F., Thomé, A.M.T., Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment: a literature review. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 64 (2015), 971–993, 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2014-0039.
38. Jaberidoost, M., Nikfar, S., Abdollahias, A., Dinarvand, R., Pharmaceutical supply chain risks: a systematic review. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 21:69 (2013), 1–7.
39. Janssen, M., Schoon, M., Ke, W., Börner, K., Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, Special issue on Resilience, Vulnerability and Adaptation, 16(3), 2006, 240–252.
40. Jüttner, U., Supply chain risk management: understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 16:1 (2005), 120–141.
41. Jüttner, U., Peck, H., Christopher, M., Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 6:4 (2003), 197–210.
42. Kache, F., Seuring, S., Linking collaboration and integration to risk and performance in supply chains via a review of literature reviews. Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. 19:5/6 (2014), 664–682.
43. Keil, M., Cule, P.E., Lyytinen, K., Schmidt, R.C., A framework for identifying software project risks. Commun. ACM 41:11 (1998), 76–83.
44. Kessler, R.C., Angermeyer, M., Anthony, J.C., De Graaf, R., Demyttenaere, K., Gasquet, I., For The WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium, Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization's World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry 6:3 (2007), 168–176.
45. Kleindorfer, P.R., Saad, G.H., Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14:1 (2005), 53–68.
46. Lambert, D.M., Cooper, M.C., Pagh, J.D., Supply chain management: implementation issues and research opportunities. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 9:2 (1998), 1–20.
47. Lehtiranta, L., Relational risk management in construction projects: modeling the complexity. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 11 (2011), 141–154.
48. Lehtiranta, L., Risk perceptions and approaches in multi-organizations: a research review 2000–2012. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32:4 (2014), 640–653, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.09.002.
49. Lu, S., Yan, H., A model for evaluating the applicability of partnering in construction. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 25:2 (2007), 164–170.
50. Mandal, S., Supply chain resilience: a state-of-the-art review and research directions. Int. J. Disaster Resilience Built Environ. 5:4 (2014), 427–453.
51. Manuj, I., Mentzer, J.T., Global supply chain risk management strategies. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 38:3 (2008), 192–223.
52. Mayring, P., Qualitative content analysis [28 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Soc. Res., 1(2), 2000 Art.20, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114fqs0002204.
53. Mcfarlan, F.W., Portfolio approach to information systems. Harv. Bus. Rev. 59:5 (1981), 142–150.
54. Norrman, A., Jansson, U., Ericsson's proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 34:5 (2004), 434–456.
55. Perminova, O., Gustafsson, M., Wikström, K., Defining uncertainty in projects—a new perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 26 (2008), 73–79.
56. Persson, O., The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 45:1 (1994), 31–38, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-G.
57. Persson, O., Danell, R., Schneider, J.W., How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Åstrom, F., Danell, R., Larsen, B., Schneider, J.W., (eds.), 2009, Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies.
58. Petersen, P.G., Aase, G.R., Heiser, D.R., Journal ranking analyses of operations management research. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 31:4 (2011), 405–422, 10.1108/01443571111119533.
59. Petticrew, R., Roberts, H., Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. A Practical Guide, 2006, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
60. Ponomarov, S.Y., Holcomb, M., Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 20:1 (2009), 124–143.
61. Project Management Institute, Practice Standard for Project Risk Management. 2009, Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania, USA.
62. Rangel, D.A., Oliveira, T.K., Leite, M.A.S., Supply chain risk classification: discussion and proposal. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2014, 10.1080/00207543.2014.910620 (forthcoming).
63. Rao, S., Goldsby, T., Supply chain risks: a review and typology. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 20:1 (2009), 97–123.
64. Rousseau, D.M., Manning, J., Denyer, D., Evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses'. Ann. Acad. Manage. 2:1 (2008), 475–515, 10.2139/ssrn.1309606.
65. Sanderson, J., Risk, uncertainty and governance in megaprojects: a critical discussion of alternative explanations. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30:4 (2012), 432–443.
66. Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., Cule, P., Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 17:4 (2001), 5–36.
67. Serdarasan, S., A review of supply chain complexity drivers. Comput. Ind. Eng. 66:3 (2013), 533–540.
68. Simangunsong, E., Hendry, L.C., Stevenson, M., Supply chain uncertainty: a review and theoretical foundation for future research. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50:16 (2012), 4493–4523, 10.1080/00207543.2011.613864.
69. Svejvig, P., Andersen, P., Rethinking project management: a structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33:2 (2015), 278–290.
70. Tang, C.S., Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 103:2 (2006), 451–488.
71. Tang, C.S., Musa, N., Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 133:1 (2011), 25–34.
72. Taroun, A., Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: insights from a literature review. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32 (2015), 101–115, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004.
73. Thomé, A.M.T., Scavarda, L.F., Fernandez, N.S., Scavarda, A.J., Sales and operations planning: a research synthesis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 138:1 (2012), 1–13, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.11.027.
74. Thomé, A.M.T., Hollmann, R.L., Scavarda, L.F., Research synthesis in collaborative planning forecast and replenishment. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 111:6 (2014), 949–965, 10.1108/IMDS-03-2014-0085.
75. Torraco, R.J., Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 4:3 (2005), 356–367, 10.1177/1534484305278283.
76. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P., Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 14:3 (2003), 207–222, 10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
77. Tukamuhabwa, B.R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J., Zorzini, M., Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53:18 (2015), 5592–5623, 10.1080/00207543.2015.1037934.
78. Verner, J.M., Brereton, O.P., Kitchenham, B.A., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Risks and risk mitigation in global software development: a tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56:1 (2014), 54–78.
79. Wagner, S.M., Bode, C., An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 12:6 (2006), 301–312, 10.1016/j.pursup.2007.01.004.
80. Yao, Y., Kohli, R., Sherer, S.A., Cederlund, J., Learning curves in collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment (CPFR) information systems: an empirical analysis form a mobile phone manufacturer. J. Oper. Manag. 31:6 (2013), 285–297.
81. Zhang, H., Two schools of risk analysis: a review of past research on project risk. Proj. Manag. J. 42:4 (2011), 5–18.