Quantification of autofluorescence imaging can accurately and objectively assess the severity of ulcerative colitis

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1639-1643

  Moriichi, Kentaro ^a   Fujiya, Mikihiro ^a   Ijiri, Masami ^a   Tanaka, Kazuyuki ^a   Sakatani, Aki ^a   Dokoshi, Tatsuya ^a   Fujibayashi, Shugo ^a   Ando, Katsuyoshi ^a   Nomura, Yoshiki ^a   Ueno, Nobuhiro ^a   Kashima, Shin ^a   Gotoh, Takuma ^a   Sasajima, Junpei ^a   Inaba, Yuhei ^a,c   Ito, Takahiro ^a   Tanabe, Hiroki ^a,b   Saitoh, Yusuke ^c   Kohgo, Yutaka ^a,b  

^a ASAHIKAWA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND WELFARE   (Japan)

^c ASAHIKAWA CITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Autofluorescence imaging; Endoscopy; Ulcerative colitis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON BIOPSY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOSCOPIST; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; ULCERATIVE COLITIS; COLITIS, ULCERATIVE; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

COLITIS, ULCERATIVE; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTICAL IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84949533233     PISSN: 01791958     EISSN: 14321262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2332-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Rogler G (2012) Inflammatory bowel disease cancer risk, detection and surveillance. Dig Dis 30(suppl 2):48–54
2. Truelove SC, Richards WC (1956) Biopsy studies in ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 1:1315–8
3. Matts SG (1961) The value of rectal biopsy in the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. Q J Med 30:393–407
4. Dick AP, Holt LP, Dalton ER (1966) Persistence of mucosal abnormality in ulcerative colitis. Gut 7:355–60
5. D’Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG et al (2007) A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 132:763–86
6. Riley SA (1991) Microscopic activity in ulcerative colitis: what does it mean? Gut 32:174–8
7. Dick AP (1966) Persistence of mucosal abnormality in ulcerative colitis. Gut 7:355–60
8. Florén CH (1987) Histologic and colonoscopic assessment of disease extension in ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:459–62
9. Gomes P (1986) Relationship between disease activity indices and colonoscopic findings in patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 27:92–5
10. Lemmens B (2013) Correlation between the endoscopic and histologic score in assessing the activity of ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19:1194–201
11. Thia KT, Loftus EV Jr, Pardi DS et al (2011) Measurement of disease activity in ulcerative colitis: interobserver agreement and predictors of severity. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17:1257–64
12. Osada T, Ohkusa T, Yokoyama T et al (2010) Comparison of several activity indices for the evaluation of endoscopic activity in UC: inter- and intraobserver consistency. Inflamm Bowel Dis 16:192–7
13. Sato R, Fujiya M, Watari J et al (2011) The diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for differentially diagnosing colon adenoma. Endoscopy 43:862–8
14. Moriichi K, Fujiya M, Sato R et al (2012) Autofluorescence imaging and the quantitative intensity of fluorescence for evaluating the dysplastic grade of colonic neoplasms. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:325–30
15. Ueno N, Fujiya M, Moriichi K et al (2011) Endosopic autofluorescence imaging is useful for the differential diagnosis of intestinal lymphomas resembling lymphoid hyperplasia. J Clin Gastroenterol 45:507–13
16. Fujiya M, Saitoh Y, Watari J et al (2007) Auto-fluorescence imaging is useful to assess the activity of ulcerative colitis. Dig Endosc 19:145–9
17. Osada T, Arakawa A, Sakamoto N et al (2011) Autofluorescence imaging endoscopy for identification and assessment of inflammatory ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 17:5110–6
18. Takehana S, Kaneko M, Mizuno H (1999) Endoscopic diagnostic system using autofluorescence. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy 5:59–63
19. Nakashima A, Miwa H, Watanabe H et al (2001) A new technique: light-induced fluorescence endoscopy in combination with pharmacoendoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 53:343–8
20. Fujiya M, Saitoh Y, Watari J et al (2007) Auto-fluorescence imaging is useful to assess the activity of ulcerative colitis. Dig Endosc 19:145–9
21. Ueno N, Fujiya M, Moriichi K et al (2011) Endosopic autofluorescence imaging is useful for the differential diagnosis of intestinal lymphomas resembling lymphoid hyperplasia. J Clin Gastroenterol 45:507–13
22. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely-available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458
23. Riley SA, Mani V, Goodman MJ et al (1991) Microscopic activity in ulcerative colitis: what does it mean? Gut 32:174–8
24. Dick AP, Holt LP, Dalton ER (1966) Persistence of mucosal abnormality in ulcerative colitis. Gut 7:355–60
25. Florén CH, Benoni C, Willén R (1987) Histologic and colonoscopic assessment of disease extension in ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:459–62
26. Lemmens B, Arijs I, Van Assche G et al (2013) Correlation between the endoscopic and histologic score in assessing the activity of ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19:1194–201
27. D’Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG et al (2007) A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 132:763–86