Land sharing vs. land sparing in the dry Caribbean lowlands: A dung beetles' perspective

Applied Soil Ecology

Volumn 98, Issue , 2016, Pages 204-212

  Montoya Molina, S ^a,b   Giraldo Echeverri, C ^a   Montoya Lerma, J ^b   Chara J ^a   Escobar, F ^c   Calle, Z ^a  

^a CIPAV Centro para la Investigación en Sistemas Sostenibles de Producción Agropecuaria   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DEL VALLE   (Colombia)

^c INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Conservation; Diversity; Scarabaeinae; Silvopastoral systems; Sustainable intensification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949516617     PISSN: 09291393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Arellano L., León-Cortés J.L., Ovaskainen O. Patterns of abundance and movement in relation to landscape structure: a study of a common scarab (Canthon cyanellus cyanellus) in Southern Mexico. Landsc. Ecol. 2008, 23:69-78.
2. Barbero E., López-Guerrero Y. Some considerations on the dispersal power of Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius 1787) in the New World (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae Scarabaeinae). Trop. Zool. 2013, 5(1):115-120.
3. Calle Z., Murgueitio E., Chará J. Integrating forestry, sustainable cattle-ranching and landscape restoration. Unasylva 2012, 239(63):31-40.
4. Calle Z., Murgueitio E., Chará E., Molina C.H., Zuluaga A.F., Calle A. A strategy for scaling-up intensive silvopastoral systems in Colombia. J. Sustain. For. 2013, 32:677-693. 10.1080/10549811.2013.817338.
5. Calle Z., Chará J., Murgueitio E., Giraldo C. Intensive silvopastoral systems: integration of sustainable cattle ranching. Ecological Restoration and Sustainable Agricultural Landscapes 2014, 27-33. Environmental Leadership and Training Initiative, New Haven, CT. http://elti.fesprojects.net/proceedings/2013_agrilandscapes.pdf, A. Calle, Z. Calle, E. Garen, A. Del Cid-Liccardi (Eds.).
6. Chandler R.B., King D.I., Raudales R., Trubey R., Chandler C., Arce-Chávez V.J. A small-scale land-sparing approach conserving biological diversity in tropical agricultural landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27(4):785-795.
7. Chará J., Murgueitio E., Zuluaga A., Giraldo C. Ganadería Colombiana Sostenible 2011, 158. Fundación CIPAV, Cali, Colombia.
8. Chao A., Jost L. Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 2012, 93:2533-2547.
9. Chao A., Gotelli N.J., Hsieh T.C., Sander E.L., Colwell R.K., Ellison A.M. Rarefaction and extrapolation with hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 2014, 84(1):45-67.
10. Cumming G., Fidler F., Vaux D.L. Error bars in experimental biology. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 21:7-11.
11. Da Silva P.G., Vaz de Mello F.Z., Di Mare R.A. Attractiveness of different bait to the Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in forest fragments in extreme southern Brazil. Zool. Stud. 2012, 51:429-441.
12. Delgado-Gómez P., Lopera-Toro A., Rangel-Ch O. Variación espacial del ensamblaje de escarabajos coprófagos (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) en remanentes de bosque seco en Chimichagua (Cesar, Colombia). Colombia Diversidad Biótica XII: La región Caribe de Colombia 2012, 833-849. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Bogotá. J.O. Rangel-Ch (Ed.).
13. Egan J.F., Mortensen D.A. A comparison of land-sharing and land-sparing strategies for plant richness conservation in agricultural landscapes. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22(2):459-471.
14. Edmonds W.D. Revision of the neotropical dung beetle genus Sulcophanaeus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Folia Heyrovskyana 2000, 6:1-60.
15. Edmonds W.D., Zídek J. Taxonomy of Phanaeus revisited: revised keys to and comments on species of the New World dung beetle genus Phanaeus MacLeay, 1819 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Phanaeini). Insecta Mundi 2012, 0274:1-108.
16. Edwards D.P., Hodgson J.A., Hamer K.C., Mitchell S.L., Ahmad A.H., Cornell S.J., Wilcove D.S. Wildlife-friendly oil palm plantations fail to protect biodiversity effectively. Conserv. Lett. 2010, 3:236-242.
17. Etter A. Diversidad ecosistémica en Colombia hoy. Nuestra Diversidad Biótica 1993, Colección Maria Restrepo de Ángel, CEREC y Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar, Bogotá. S. Cárdenas, H.D. Correa (Eds.).
18. Feinsinger P. El diseño de estudios de campo para la conservación de la biodiversidad 2003, 242. FAN (Fundación Amigos de la Naturaleza), Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.
19. Fischer J., Brosi B., Daily G.C., Ehrlich P.R., Goldman R., Goldstein J., Lindenmayer D.B., Manning A.D., Mooney H.A., Pejchar L., Ranganathan J., Tallis H. Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming?. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6(7):380-385.
20. Francesconi W., Montagnini F. Biodiversidad y conservación de bosques: funciones potenciales de los sistemas agroforestales. Actas, CD. XVI Jornadas Técnicas Forestales y Ambientales 2014, 15-17. E. Weber, S. Bath, J. Redes (Eds.).
21. Galante E., Garcia-Román M., Barrera I., Galindo P. Comparison of spatial distribution patterns of dung feeding scarabs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae) in wooded and open pastureland in the mediterranean Dehesa area of the Iberian Peninsula. Environ. Entomol. 1991, 20(1):90-97.
22. Garnett T., Appleby M.C., Balmford A., Bateman I.J., Benton T.G., Bloomer P., Burlingame B., Dawkins M., Dolan L., Fraser D., Herrero M., Hoffmann I., Smith P., Thornton P.K., Toulmin C., Vermeulen S.J., Godfray H.C.J. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 2013, 341:33-34.
23. Gascon C., Williamson B., Fonseca G.A.B. Receding forest edges and vanishing reserves. Science 2000, 288:1356-1358.
24. Génier F. Le genre Eurysternus Dalman, 1824 (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Oniticellini) révision taxonomique et clés de détermination illustrées. Pensoft Ser. Faun. 2009, 85:1-430.
25. Gilroy J.J., Edwards F.A., Medina Uribe C.A., Haugaasen T., Edwards D.P. Surrounding habitats mediate the trade-off between land-sharing and land-sparing agriculture in the tropics. J. Appl. Ecol. 2014, 4:503-507.
26. Giraldo C., Escobar F., Chará J.D., Calle Z. The adoption of silvopastoral systems promotes the recovery of ecological processes regulated by dung beetles in the Colombian Andes. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2010, 4:115-122.
27. Gray C.L., Slade E.M., Mann D.J., Lewis O.T. Do riparian reserves support dung beetle biodiversity and ecosystem services in oil palm-dominated tropical landscapes?. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4(7):1049-1060.
28. Halffter G., Edmonds W.D. The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae). An Ecological and Evolutive Approach 1982, 176. Instituto de Ecología, A.C., México, D.F.
29. Halffter G., Favila M.E. The Scarabaeinae (Insecta: Coleoptera): an animal group for analyzing, inventorying and monitoring biodiversity in tropical rainforest and modified landscapes. Biol. Int. 1993, 27:15-121.
30. Halffter G., Matthews E.G. The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomol. Mex. 1966, 12(14):1-312.
31. Harvey C.A., Sáenz J., Montero J., Medina A., Sánchez D., Vílchez S., Hernández B., Maes J.M., Sinclair F.L. Abundance and species richness of trees, birds, bats, butterflies and dung beetles in silvopastotal systems in the agricultural landscape of Cañas, Costa Rica and Rivas, Nicaragua. CATIE 2004, 82-84.
32. Hill M. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 1973, 54:427-432.
33. Hodgson J.A., Kunin W.E., Thomas C.D., Benton T.G., Gabriel D. Comparing organic farming and land sparing: optimizing yield and butterfly populations scale. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13(11):1358-1367.
34. Holdridge, L.R., 1978. Ecología basada en zonas de vida. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA): Serie de libros y materiales educativos. No. 34.
35. Hulme M.F., Vickery J.A., Green R.E., Phalan B., Chamberlain D.E., Pomeroy D.E., Nalwanga D., Mushabe D., Katebaka R., Bolwig S., Atkinson P.W. Conserving the birds of Uganda's banana-coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared. PLoS One 2013, 8(2):e54597.
36. Jost L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 2006, 113:363-375.
37. Jost L. The relation between evenness and diversity. Diversity 2010, 113(2):363-375.
38. Kremen C. Reframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate for biodiversity conservation. Ann. N. Y. Sci. 2015, 1-25.
39. Lumaret J.P., Martínez I. El impacto de productos veterinarios sobre insectos coprófagos: consecuencias sobre la degradación del estiércol en pastizales. Acta Zool. Mex. 2005, 21(3):137-148.
40. Kruskal J.B., Wish M. Multidimensional Scaling 1978, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
41. Magurran A. Measuring Biological Diversity 2004, Blackwell Publishing, United Kingdom.
42. Maurer K., Weyand A., Fischer M., Stocklin J. Old cultural traditions, in addition to land use and topography, are shaping plant diversity of grasslands in the Alps. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 130(3):438-446.
43. Martínez N.J., García H., Pulido L.A., Ospino D., Narváez J.C. Escarabajos coprófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) de la vertiente noroccidental, Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Neotrop. Entomol. 2009, 38(6):708-715.
44. Montes de Oca E. Escarabajos coprófagos de un escenario ganadero típico de la región de Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz: importancia del paisaje en la composición de un gremio funcional. Acta Zool. Mex. 2001, 82:111-132.
45. Murgueitio E., Calle Z., Uribe F., Calle A., Solorio B. Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 261:1654-1663.
46. Nichols E., Spector S., Louzada J., Larsen T., Amezquita S., Favila M.E. Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:1461-1474.
47. Noriega J.A., Moreno J., Otavo S. Quince años del arribo del escarabajo coprófago Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) a Colombia: proceso de invasión y posibles efectos de su establecimiento. Biota Colomb. 2011, 12(2):35-44.
48. Phalan B., Onial M., Balmford A., Green R.E. Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 2011, 333(6047):1289-1291.
49. Perfecto I., Vandermeer J. Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems-a new conservation paradigm. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1134:173-200.
50. Perfecto I., Vandermeer J. The agricultural matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107(13):5786-5791.
51. Pizano C., González-M R., González M.F., Castro- Lima F., López R., Rodríguez N., Idárraga-Piedrahíta A., Vargas W., Vergara-Varela H., Castaño-Naranjo A., Devia W., Rojas A., Cuadros H., Toro J.L. El bosque seco tropical en Colombia 2014, 49-93. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH), Bogotá D.C. C. Pizano, H. García (Eds.).
52. Portillo-Quintero C.A., Sánchez-Azofeifa G.A. Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:144-155.
53. Pywell R.F., Heard M.S., Bradbury R.B., Hinsley S., Nowakowski M., Walker K.J., Bullock J.M. Wildlife-friendly farming benefits rare birds, bees and plants. Biol. Lett. 2012, 8:772-775.
54. Quinn J.E., Brandle J.R., Johnson R.J. The effects of land sparing and wildlife-friendly practices on grassland bird abundance within organic farmlands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 161:10-16.
55. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
56. Rivera L., Armbrecht I., Calle Z. Silvopastoral systems and ant diversity conservation in a cattle-dominated landscape of the Colombian Andes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 181:188-194.
57. Rodríguez G., Banda-R K., Reyes S.P.B., Estupiñán A.C. Lista comentada de las plantas vasculares de bosques secos prioritarios para la conservación en los departamentos de Atlñntico y Bolávar (Caribe colombiano). Biota Colomb. 2012, 13(2):7-39.
58. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration 2004, Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Available from www.ser.org.
59. Spector S. Scarabaeine dung bdung beetles (coleoptera: scarabaeidae: scarabaeinae): an invertebrate focal taxon for biodiversity research and can invertebrate focal taxon for biodiversity research and conservation. Coleopt. Bull. 2006, 60(sp5):71-83.
60. Tscharntke T., Clough Y., Wanger T.C., Jackson L., Motzke I., Perfecto I., Vandermeer J., Whitbread A. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 151(1):53-59.
61. UNCCD, United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification Tercer Informe Nacional de Implementación de la Convención de las Naciones Unidas de Lucha contra la Desertificación y la Sequía 2007, 38. Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial/Secretaría UNCCD, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
62. Vaz de Mello F.Z., Edmonds W.D., Ocampo F.C., Schoolmeesters P. A multilingual key to the genera and subgenera of the subfamily Scarabaeinae of the New World (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Zootaxa 2011, 2854:1-73.
63. von Wehrden H., Abson D.J., Beckmann M., Cord A.F., Klotz R., Seppelt R. Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 10.1007/s10980-014-0038-7.
64. Wolda H. Similarity indices, simple size and diversity. Oecologia 1981, 50:296-302.
65. Whittaker R.H. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 1965, 147:250-260.
66. Zunino M., Barbero E. Escarabajos, ganado, pastizales: algunas consideraciones deontológicas. Folia Entomol. Mex. 1993, 87:95-101.