Modeling and analysis of opportunistic routing in low duty-cycle underwater sensor networks

MSWiM 2015 - Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 125-132

  Coutinho, Rodolfo W L ^a,b   Boukerche, Azzedine ^b   Vieira, Luiz F M ^a   Loureiro, Antonio A F ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Asynchronous duty cycling; Energy efficiency; Opportunistic routing; Underwater wireless sensor networks

Indexed keywords

ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FADING CHANNELS; LOW POWER ELECTRONICS; NETWORK ROUTING; POWER MANAGEMENT (TELECOMMUNICATION); WIRELESS AD HOC NETWORKS;

ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATIONS; ASYNCHRONOUS DUTY-CYCLING; EFFECTIVE APPROACHES; NUMBER OF TRANSMISSIONS; OPPORTUNISTIC ROUTING; RELIABLE DATA DELIVERY; UNDERWATER SENSOR NETWORKS; UNDERWATER WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

EID: 84949493498     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2811587.2811608     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Bellhop-Ocean Acoustics Library. http://oalib.hlsresearch.com/Rays/,2015.
2. L. M. Brekhovskikh and Y. Lysanov. Fundamentals of Ocean Acoustics. Springer, 2003.
3. M. Buettner, G. V. Yee, E. Anderson, and R. Han. X-MAC: a short preamble mac protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In ACM SenSys, pg. 307-320, 2006.
4. C. Carbonelli and U. Mitra. Cooperative multihop communication for underwater acoustic networks. In WUWNet, pg. 97-100, 2006.
5. A. Caruso et al. The meandering current mobility model and its impact on underwater mobile sensor networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2008.
6. R. W. L. Coutinho, A. Boukerche, L. F. M. Vieira, and A. A. Loureiro. GEDAR: geographic and opportunistic routing protocol with depth adjustment for mobile underwater sensor networks. In IEEE ICC, 2014.
7. R. W. L. Coutinho, A. Boukerche, L. F. M. Vieira, and A. A. F. Loureiro. Local maximum routing recovery in underwater sensor networks: Performance and trade-offs. In IEEE MASCOTS, pg. 112-119, 2014.
8. R. W. L. Coutinho, A. Boukerche, L. F. M. Vieira, and A. A. F. Loureiro. A novel void node recovery paradigm for long-term underwater sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 2015.
9. A. Darehshoorzadeh, M. Sanchez, and A. Boukerche. Modeling and analysis of opportunistic routing in multi-hop wireless networks. In IEEE MASCOTS, pg. 337-344, 2014.
10. L. Freitag, M. Grund, S. Singh, J. Partan, P. Koski, and K. Ball. The WHOI micro-modem: An acoustic communcations and navigation system for multiple platforms. In MTS/IEEE Oceans, 2005.
11. J. Heidemann, M. Stojanovic, and M. Zorzi. Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1958): 158-175, 2012.
12. J. Heidemann, W. Ye, J. Wills, A. Syed, and Y. Li. Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking. In IEEE WCNC, pg. 228-235, 2006.
13. W. Hu, J. Xie, and Z. Zhang. Practical opportunistic routing in high-speed multi-rate wireless mesh networks. In ACM MobiHoc, pg. 127-136, 2013.
14. U. Lee et al. Pressure routing for underwater sensor networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, pg. 1-9, 2010.
15. Y. Li, W. Chen, and Z.-L. Zhang. Optimal forwarder list selection in opportunistic routing. In IEEE MASS, pg. 670-675, 2009.
16. Z. Li, M. Li, and Y. Liu. Towards energy-fairness in asynchronous duty-cycling sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw., 10(3): 38:1-38:26, 2014.
17. T. Rappaport. Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice. Prentice Hall, 2002.
18. P. H. Rogers. Onboard Prediction of Propagation Loss in Shallow Water. Washington DC: Naval Research Lab Defense Technical Information Center, 1981.
19. M. Stojanovic. Recent advances in high-speed underwater acoustic communications. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., pg. 125-136, 1996.
20. M. Stojanovic. On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic commun. channel. In WUWNet, pg. 41-47, 2006.
21. M. Stojanovic and J. Preisig. Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Commun. Mag., 47(1): 84-89, 2009.
22. Y. Sun, O. Gurewitz, and D. B. Johnson. RI-MAC: a receiver-initiated asynchronous duty cycle mac protocol for dynamic traffic loads in wireless sensor networks. In ACM SenSys, pg. 1-14, 2008.
23. Teledyne-Benthos. http://www.benthos.com,2015.
24. G. Toso, P. Casari, and M. Zorzi. The effect of different attenuation models on the performance of routing in shallow-water networks. In IEEE UComms, pg. 1-5, 2014.
25. J. R. Urick. Principles of Underwater Sound. McGraw-Hill, 1983.
26. L. F. M. Vieira. Performance and trade-offs of opportunistic routing in underwater networks. In IEEE WCNC, pg. 2911-2915, 2012.
27. P. Xie, J. hong Cui, and L. Lao. VBF: vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks. In IFIP-TC6 NETWORKING, pg. 1216-1221, 2006.
28. H. Yan, Z. J. Shi, and J.-H. Cui. DBR: depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In IFIP-TC6 NETWORKING, pg. 72-86, 2008.
29. K. Zeng, W. Lou, and H. Zhai. Capacity of opportunistic routing in multi-rate and multi-hop wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(12), pg. 5118-5128, 2008.