Disclosure risk assessment in perturbative microdata protection

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2316, Issue , 2002, Pages 135-152

  Yancey, William E ^a   Winkler, William E ^a   Creecy, Robert H ^a  

^a US Bureau of the Census   (United States)

Author keywords

Additive noise; EM Algorithm; Mixtures; Rank swapping; Record linkage

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVE NOISE; ALGORITHMS; DATA HANDLING; MIXTURES; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

DATA PERTURBATION; EM ALGORITHMS; EMPIRICAL - COMPARISONS; INFORMATION LOSS; MICRODATA PROTECTION; RANK SWAPPING; RE IDENTIFICATIONS; RECORD LINKAGE;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84949456343     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47804-3_11     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., and Rubin, D.B.: Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 39 (1977) 1-38.
2. Dalenius, T. and Reiss, S.P.: Data-swapping: A Technique for Disclosure Control of Microdata, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 6 (1982) 73-85.
3. De Waal, A.G. and Willenborg, L.C.R.J.: A View on Statistical Disclosure Control of Microdata, Survey Methodology, 22, (1996) 95-103.
4. De Waal, A.G. and Willenborg, L.C.R.J.: Optimal Local Suppression in Microdata, Journal of Official Statistics, 14, (1998) 421-435.
5. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Mateo-Sanz, J., and Torra, V.: Comparing SDC Methods for Microdata on the Basis of Information Loss and Disclosure Risk, Proceedings of ETK-NTTS 2001, (2001) to appear.
6. Fellegi, I.P. and Sunter, A.B.: A Theory for Record Linkage, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, (1969) 1183-1210.
7. Fuller, W.A.: Masking Procedures for Microdata Disclosure Limitation, Journal of Official Statistics, 9, (1993) 383-406.
8. Kim, J.J.: A Method for Limiting Disclosure in Microdata Based on Random Noise and Transformation, American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, (1986) 303-308.
9. Kim, J.J.: Subdomain Estimation for the Masked Data, American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, (1990) 456-461.
10. Kim, J.J. and Winkler, W.E.: Masking Microdata Files, American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, (1995) 114-119.
11. Kim, J.J. and Winkler, W.E.: Multiplicative Noise for Masking Continuous Data, American Statistical Association Proceedings of Secure Survey Research Methods, (to appear).
12. Lambert, D.: Measures of Disclosure Risk and Harm, Journal of Official Statistics, 9, (1993) 313-331.
13. Moore, R.: Controlled Data Swapping Techniques for Masking Public Use Microdata, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Research Division Report 96/04 (1996).
14. Roque, G.M.: Masking Microdata Files with Mixtures of Multivariate Normal Distributions, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Statistics, University of California-Riverside (2000).
15. Tendick, P. and Matloff, N.: A Modified Random Perturbation Method for Database Security, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 19, (1994) 47-63.
16. Winkler, W.E.: Advanced Methods for Record Linkage, American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, (1994) 467-472.
17. Winkler, W.E.: Matching and Record Linkage, in B.G. Cox (ed.) Business Survey Methods, New York: J. Wiley, (1995) 355-384.
18. Winkler, W.E.: Re-identification Methods for Evaluating the Confidentiality of Analytically Valid Microdata, Research in Official Statistics, 1, (1998) 87-104