Inter-organisational and network learning through cross-cultural education partnerships: Implications for the health-related Millennium Development Goals

Humanitarian Work Psychology and the Global Development Agenda: Case Studies and Interventions

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 127-140

  Glavey, Sarah ^a   Uduma, Ogenna ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949294198     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315682419     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. The Accra Agenda for Action. (2008). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/34428351.pdf
2. Andrews, M., Pritchett, L. & Woolcock, M. (2013). Escaping capability traps through problem driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). World Development, 51, 234-244.
3. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B.C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66 (Suppl. 1), 44-55.
4. Casebeer, A. L., Reay, T., Dewald, J., & Pablo, A. (2010). Knowing through doing: Unleashing latent dynamic capabilities in a public sector context. In K. Walshe, G. Harvey, & P. Jas (Eds.), Connecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services (pp. 251-275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Drucker, P. F. (1992). The new society of organizations. Harvard Business Review, 70(5), 95-104.
6. Dunford, R., & Jones, D. (2000). Narrative in strategic change. Human Relations, 53(9), 1207-1226.
7. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 10-11(21), 1105-1121.
8. Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Madhavan, R. (2011). How do networks matter? The performance effects of interorganizational networks. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 207.
9. Hoberecht, S., Joseph, B., Spencer, J., & Southern, N. (2011). Inter-organizational networks: An emerging paradigm of whole systems change. OD Practitioner, 43(4), 23-27.
10. Jarillo, J. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 31-41.
11. Keast, R., Mandell, M. P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363-371.
12. Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-863.
13. Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2006). A manager's guide to choosing and using collaborative networks: IBM center for the business of government. IBM Report on the Business of Government.
14. The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness (2005). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/34428351. pdf
15. Popp, J., MacKean, G., Casebeer, A., Milward, H. B., & Lindstrom, R. (2013). Interorganizational networks: A critical review of the literature to inform practice. IBM Center for the Business of Government Special Report.
16. Provan, K., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229.
17. Rodríguez, C., Langley, A., Béland, F., & Denis, J. (2007). Governance, power, and mandated collaboration in an interorganizational network. Administration & Society, 39(2), 150.
18. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of learning. New York: Doubleday.
19. Trinity College Dublin. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.global-health.tcd.ie/indigo/
20. United Nations. (2013). The Millennium Development Goals Report New York. Retrieved from www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/report-2013/mdg-report-2013-english.pdf
21. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualisation and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.