Discourse processing of dialogues with multiple threads

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1995-June, Issue , 1995, Pages 31-38

  Rosé, Carolyn Penstein ^a   Di Eugenio, Barbara ^a   Levin, Lori S ^a   van Ess Dykema, Carol ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Defense Mail Stop: R525 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

DISCOURSE PROCESSING; MULTIPLE THREADS; PLAN-BASED; SPEECH TRANSLATION SYSTEMS; SPEECH-TO-SPEECH TRANSLATION; TRANSLATION SYSTEMS; TREE STRUCTURE APPROACHES; TREE STRUCTURES;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 84949243613     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. M. E. Bratman, D. J. Israel and M. E. Pollack. 1988. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 3, pp 117-136.
2. B. J. Grosz and S. Kraus. 1993. Collaborative plans for group activities. In Proceedings of IJCAI-93, pp 367-373, Chambery, Savoie, France.
3. B. Grosz and C. Sidner. 1986. Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics 12, 175-204.
4. E. A. Hinkelman. 1990. Linguistic and Pragmatic Constraints on Utterance Interpretation. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester, Department of Computer Science. Technical Report 288.
5. Hitoshi Iida and Hidekazu Arita. 1990. Natural Language Dialog Understanding on a Four-Layer Plan Recognition Model. Transactions of IPSJ 31:6, pp 810-821.
6. K. Kogura, M. Kume, and H. Iida. 1990. IIlocutionary Act Based Translation of Dialogues. The Third International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Language.
7. L. Lambert and S. Carberry. 1994. A Process Model for Recognizing Communicative Acts and Modeling Negotiation Subdialogues. under review for journal publication.
8. L. Lambert. Recognizing Complex Discourse Acts: A Tripartite Plan-Based Model of Dialogue. PhD dissertation. Tech. Rep. 93-19, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware. 1993.
9. L. Lambert and S. Carberry. A Tripartite, Plan Recognition Model for Structuring Discourse. Discourse Structure in NL Understanding and Generation. AAAI Fall Symposium. Nov 1991.
10. A. Lavie and M. Tomita. 1993. GLR* - An Efficient Noise Skipping Parsing Algorithm for Context Free Grammars, in the Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Parsing Technologies. Tilburg, The Netherlands.
11. K. E. Lochbaum. 1994. Using Collaborative Plans to Model the Intentional Structure of Discourse. PhD dissertation, Harvard University. Technical Report TR-25-94...
12. W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson. 1986. Relational Propositions in Discourse. Technical Report RR-83-115. Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA, November.
13. L. Polanyi. 1988. A Formal Model of the Structure of Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 12, pp 601-638.
14. C. P. Rose. 1994. Plan-Based Discourse Processor for Negotiation Dialogues, unpublished manuscript.
15. C. P. Rose. 1995. The Structure of Multiple Headed Negotiations, unpublished manuscript.
16. R. Scha and L. Polanyi. 1988. An Augmented Context Free Grammar for Discourse. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Budapest.
17. B. Suhm, L. Levin, N. Coccaro, J. Carbonell, K. Horiguchi, R. Isotani, A. Lavie, L. Mayfield, C. P. Rose, C. Van Ess-Dykema, A. Waibel. 1994. Speech-language integration in multilingual speech translation system, in Working Notes of the Workshop on Integration of Natural Language and Speech Processing, Paul McKevitt (chair). AAAI-94, Seattle.
18. M. A. Walker. Information Redundancy and Resource Bounds in Dialogue. PhD Dissertation, Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
19. B. L. Webber. 1991. Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(2), pp 107-135.