Constraints on water use efficiency of drought tolerant maize grown in a semi-arid environment

Field Crops Research

Volumn 186, Issue , 2016, Pages 66-77

  Tolk, Judy A ^a   Evett, Steven R ^a   Xu, Wenwei ^b   Schwartz, Robert C ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundary analysis; Evapotranspiration; Water use efficiency; Yield potential

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITION; DROUGHT; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; LYSIMETER; MAIZE; SEMIARID REGION; SOIL TEXTURE; TOLERANCE; WATER RESOURCE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

BUSHLAND; GREAT PLAINS; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84949239105     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allen R.G., Periera L.S., Raes D., Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56 1998, Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome, Italy.
2. Allen R.G., Walter I.A., Eliott R.L., Howell T.A., Itenfisu D., Jensen M.E., Snyder R.L. The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation 2005, ASCE, Reston, VA.
3. Baldwin, J.L., 1973. Climates of the United States, U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C. (available at ). http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt%3Fid=uiug.30112104115610;view=1up;seq=15.
4. Blum A. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential-are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2005, 56:1159-1218.
5. Blum A. Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Res. 2009, 112:119-123.
6. Cade B.S., Terrell J.W., Schroeder R.L. Estimating effects of limiting factors with regression quantiles. Ecology 1999, 80(1):311-323.
7. Cattivelli L., Rizza F., Badeck F.-W., Mazzucotelli E., Mastrangelo A.M., Francia E., Mare C., Tondelli A., Stanca A.M. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 2008, 105:1-14.
8. Cicchino M., Edreira J.I.R., Uribelarrea M., Otegui M.E. Heat stress in field-grown maize: response of physiological determinants of grain yields. Crop Sci. 2010, 50:1438-1448.
9. Claassen M.M., Shaw R.H. Water deficit effects on corn. II. Grain components. Agron. J. 1970, 62:652-655.
10. Cooper M., Gho C., Leafgren R., Tang T., Messina C. Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn belt: discovery to product. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65:6191-6204.
11. Dehghanisanij H., Nakhjavani M.M., Tahiri A.D., Anyoji H. Assessment of wheat and maize water productivities and production function for cropping system decisions in arid and semiarid regions. Irrig. Drain. 2009, 58:105-115.
12. Denmead O.T., Shaw R.H. The effects of moisture stress at different stages of growth on the development and yield of corn. Agron. J. 1960, 52:272-274.
13. Duvick D.N. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L). Adv. Agron. 2005, 86:3-145.
14. Duvick D.N., Cassman K.G. Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the north-central United States. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:1622-1630.
15. Echarte L., Andrade F.H. Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crops Res. 2003, 82:1-12.
16. Evans L.T., Fischer R.A. Yield potential Its definition, measurement, and significance. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:1544-1551.
17. Evett S.R. Neutron moisture meters. Field Estimation of Soil Water Content: A Practical Guide to Methods, Instrumentation, and Sensor Technology 2008, 39-54. IAEA-TCS-30. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, (Chapter 3), ISSN 1018-5518. Available at
18. Evett S.R., Kustas W.P., Gowda P.H., Prueger J.H., Howell T.A. Overview of the Bushland evapotranspiration and agricultural remote sensing EXperiment 2008 (BEAREX08): a field experiment evaluating methods quantifying ET at multiple scales. Adv. Water Resourc. 2012, 50:4-19. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.010.
19. Evett S.R., Tolk J.A., Howell T.A. A depth control stand for improved accuracy with the neutron probe. Vadose Zone J. 2003, 2:642-649.
20. Fletcher A.L., Sinclair T.R., Allen L.H. Transpiration responses to vapor pressure deficit in well water 'slow wilting' and commercial soybean. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61:145-151.
21. French R.J., Schultz J.E. Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1984, 35:743-764.
22. Gaffney J., Schussler J., Loffler C., Cai W., Paszkiewicz S., et al. Industry-scale evaluation of maize hybrids selected for increased yield in drought-stress conditions of the US corn belt. Crop Sci. 2015, 55:1608-1618.
23. Grassini P., Hall A.J., Mercau J.L. Benchmarking sunflower water productivity in semiarid environments. Field Crops Res. 2009, 110:251-262.
24. Grassini P., Yang H., Cassman K.G. Limits to maize productivity in Western Corn-Belt: a simulation analysis for fully irrigated and rainfed conditions. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2009, 149:1254-1265.
25. Grassini P., Yang H., Irmak S., Thorburn J., Burr C., Cassman K.G. High-yield irrigated maize in the Western U.S. Corn Belt: III. Irrigation management and crop water productivity. Field Crops Res. 2011, 120:133-141.
26. Hao B., Zue Q., Marek T.H., Jessup K.E., Hou Z., et al. Soil water extraction, water use, and grain yield by drought-tolerant maize on the Texas High Plains. Agric. Water Manage. 2015, 155:11-21.
27. Hodges T. Modeling and programming philosophies. Predicting Cotton Phenology 1991, 101-105. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. T. Hodges (Ed.).
28. Howell T.A. Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agron. J. 2001, 93(2):281-289.
29. Howell T.A., Evett S.R., Tolk J.A., Copeland K.S., Dusek D.A., Colaizzi P.D. Crop coefficients developed at Bushland, Texas for corn, wheat, sorghum, soybean, cotton, and alfalfa. Proceedings World Environment and Water Resources Congress, 2006, Omaha, NE. 21-25 May 2006 2006.
30. Howell T.A., Schneider A.D., Jensen M.E. History of lysimeter design and use for evapotranspiration measurement. Lysimeters for evapotranspiration and environmental measurements. Proc. Int. Symp. Lysimetry 1991, 1-9. ASCE, Reston, VA. T.A. Allen, W.O. Howell, I.A. Pruitt (Eds.).
31. Howell T.A., Tolk J.A., Schneider A.D., Evett S.R. Evapotranspiration, yield, and water use efficiency of corn hybrids differing in maturity. Agron. J. 1998, 90:3-9.
32. Howell T.A., Yazar A., Schneider A.D., Dusek D.A., Copeland K.S. Yield and water use efficiency of corn in response to LEPA irrigation. Trans. ASAE 1995, 38:1737-1747.
33. Jalota S.K., Singh S., Chahal G.B.S., Ray S.S., Panigraghy S. Soil texture, climate and management effects on plant growth, grain yield and water use by rainfed maize-wheat cropping system: field and simulation study. Agric. Water Manage. 2010, 97:83-90.
34. Katerji N., Mastrorilli M. The effect of soil texture on the water use efficiency of irrigated crops: results of a multi-year experiment carried out in the Mediterranean region. Eur. J. Agron. 2009, 30:95-100.
35. Klute A. Water retention: laboratory methods. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods 1986, 635-661. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison WI. 2nd ed. A. Klute (Ed.).
36. Nielsen D.C., Halvorson A.D., Vigil M.F. Critical precipitation period for dryland maize production. Field Crops Res. 2010, 118:259-263.
37. Nielsen D.C., Vigil M.F., Benjamin J.G. The variable response of dryland corn yield to soil water content at planting. Agric. Water Manage. 2008, 96:330-336.
38. Pask A.J.D., Reynolds M.P. Breeding for yield potential has increased deep soil water extraction capacity in irrigated wheat. Crop Sci. 2013, 53:2090-2104.
39. Passioura J. Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce-from breeding to field management. Agric. Water Manage. 2006, 80:176-196.
40. Ritchie, S.W., Hanway, J.J., Benson, G.O., 1993. How a corn plant develops, Special Report. No. 48, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Cooperative Extension Service, Ames, IA.
41. Robins J.S., Domingo C.E. Some effects of soil moisture stress at different stages of growth in corn. Agron. J. 1953, 45:618-621.
42. SAS Institute, Inc., 2008. SAS/STAT 9.2 User's Guide, SAS, Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
43. Savage M.J., Ritchie J.T., Bland W.L., Dugas W.A. Lower limit of soil water availability. Agron. J. 1996, 88:644-651.
44. Schneider A.D., Howell T.A., Steiner J.L. An evapotranspiration research facility using monolithic lysimeters from three soils. Appl. Eng. Agric. 1993, 9:227-232.
45. Shanahan J.F., Nielsen D.C. The influence of growth retardants (anti-gibberelins) on corn vegetative growth, water use, and grain yield under different levels of water stress. Agron. J. 1987, 79:103-109.
46. Shaw R.H. Climatic requirement. Corn and Corn Improvement 1976, vol. 18:591-623. Agronomy.
47. Tanner C.B., Sinclair T.R. Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search?. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production 1983, 1-27. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. W.R. Taylor (Ed.).
48. Tolk J.A. Plant available soil water. Encyclopedia of Water Science 2003, 669-672. Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY, NY. B.A. Stewart, T.A. Howell (Eds.).
49. Tolk J.A., Evett S.R. Lower limits of crop water use in three soil textural classes. SSSAJ 2012, 76:607-616.
50. Tolk J.A., Evett S.R., Schwartz R.C. Field-measured, hourly soil water evaporation stages in relation to reference evapotranspiration rate and soil to air temperature ratio. Vadose Zone J. 2015, 10.2136/vzj2014.07.0079.
51. Tolk J.A., Howell T.A., Evett S.R. Evapotranspiration and yield of corn grown on three High Plains soils. Agron. J. 1998, 90:447-454.
52. Tolk J.A., Howell T.A., Evett S.R. An evapotranspiration research facility for soil-plant-environment interactions. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2005, 21:993-998.
53. Tollenaar M., Lee E.A. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Res. 2002, 75:161-169.
54. Tollenaar M., Wu J. Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:1597-1604.
55. USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2015. Crops US state and county databases, 2005-2014. Washington, DC (online WWW). Available from (accessed 29.06.15.). http://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Lite/.
56. van Ittersum M.K., Cassman K.G., Grassini P., Wolf J., Tittonell P., Hochman Z. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance-a review. Field Crops Res. 2013, 143:4-17.
57. Zarnoch, S.J., 2009. Testing hypotheses for differences between linear regression lines. [Online]. Res. Note SRS-17. USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC. Available at (verified 10 August 2015). http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/33218.