Towards a dialogue taxonomy

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1236, Issue , 1997, Pages 29-40

  Dahlbäck, Nils ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LINGUISTICS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; FINE GRAINED; HUMAN-COMPUTER DIALOGUES; NATURAL LANGUAGE DIALOGUE; SPOKEN DIALOGUE; SPOKEN LANGUAGE DIALOGUE SYSTEM; WIZARD OF OZ;

TAXONOMIES;

EID: 84949238363     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63175-5_35     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Ahrenberg, L., Dahlbäck, N., and Jönsson, A. (Forthcoming). Dialogue mangaäement for natural language interfaces. Manuscript in preparation.
2. Bertenstaau, J., Blomberg, M., Carlson, R., Gustafson, J., Hunnicutt, S., Högberg, I., Lindell, R.., Neovius, L., de Serpa-Leitao, A., Nord, L., and N. Ström (1985) Spoken dialogue data collection in the Waxholm project. STL-QPSR 1/1995, 50.73.
3. Bilwuge, E. (1991). A task independent oral dialogue model. In Fifth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (E-A CL'91).
4. Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. In Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E., editors, The Handbook of Social Psychology (3rd edition). Erlbaum.
5. Clark, H. H. and Carlson, T. (1981). Context for comprehension. In Long,:I. and Baddeley, A., editors, Attention and Performance IX. Erlbaum.
6. Clark, H. H. and Marshall, C. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, A., Webber, B., and Sag, I., editors, Elements of Disourse Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
7. Cohen, P. IL (1984a). The pragmatics of referring and the modality of communication. Computational Linguistics, 10:97-146.
8. Cohen, K. (1984b). A computational theory of the function of clue words in argument understanding. In COLING'84, Stanford, CA.
9. Dahlbäck, N. (1991). Representations of Discourse. PhD thesis, Linköping University, Sweden.
10. Dahlbäck, N. (1992). Pronoun usage in nli-dialogues: A wizard of oz study. In Papers from the third Nordic Conference of Text Comprehension in Man and Machine.
11. Dahlbäck, Nils (1995) Kinds of Agents and Types of Dialogues In J. A. Andernach and S. P. van de Burgt and G. F. van der Hoeven (editors), Proceedings of the Ninth Twente Workshop on Language Technology, TWLT 9. Enschede.
12. Dahlbäck, N. and Jönsson, A. (1989). Empirical studies of discourse representations for natural language interfaces. Proceedings of the gth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Manchester, England.
13. Dahlbäck, N. and Jönsson, A. (1992). An empirically based computationally tractable dialogue model. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cgnitive Science Society (CogSci '92).
14. Fraurud, K. (1988). Pronoun resolution in unrestricted text. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 2:47-68.
15. Grishman, K. and Kittredge, R. (1986). Analyzing Language in Restricted Domains. Erlbaum.
16. Grosz, B. J. (1977). The Representation and Uses of Focus in Dialogue. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
17. Guindon, R., Sladky, P., Brunner, H, and Conner (1986) The structure of useradvior dialogues: Is there a method in their madness? Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 224-230.
18. Guindon, R., Shuldberg, K., and Connor, J. (1987) Grammatical and ungram, matical structures in user-advisor dialogues: Evidence for suflicience of restricted languages in natural language interfaces to advisory systems. Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics
19. Guindon, R. (1988). A multidisciplinary perspective on dialogue structure in useradvisory dialgues. In Guindon, R., editor, Cognitive Science and Its Application for Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbanm Publishers.
20. J6nsson, A. (1993). Dialogue Management for Natural Language Interfaces. PhD thesis, Linköping University.
21. Jönsson, Arne (1996) A Model for Dialogue Management for Human Computer Interaction in Proceedings of ISSD'96, Philadelphia, 69-72;1996.
22. Kennedy, A., Wilkes, A., Elder, L., and Murray, W. (1988). Dialogue with machines. Cognition, 30:73-105.
23. Lappin, S. and Leass, H. J. (1994). An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4):535-561.
24. Linen, P. (1982) The Written Language Bias in Linguistics Studies in Communication 2 (SIC 2). Department of Communication Studies, LinkSping University.
25. Malhotra, A. (1975) Knowledge-based English language systems for management support: an analysis of requirements. Procevdings of IJCAI'75
26. Pattabhiraman, T. (1994). Review of "user modeling in text generation" by C4cile 1. Paris. Computational Linguistics, 20:318-321.
27. Rachel Reichman (1985). Getting Computers to Talk Like You and Me MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
28. Reilly, R. (1987a). Ill-formedness and miscommunication in person-machine dialogue Information and Software Technology, 29:69-74
29. Reilly, R. (1987b) Communication failure in dialogue: Implications for natural language understanding. Paper presented at the seminar Recent developments and applications of natural language understanding, London, Dec 8-10.
30. Kubin, A. (1980). A theoretical taxonomy of the differences between oral and written language. In Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. B., and Brewer, W. F., editors, Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Erlbaum.
31. Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Volosinov, V.N. (1973) Marzism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.