Why gender matters to ecological management and poverty reduction

Integrating Ecology and Poverty Reduction: The Application of Ecology in Development Solutions

Volumn 9781461401865, Issue , 2012, Pages 39-59

  Gutierrez Montes, Isabel ^a   Emery, Mary ^b   Fernandez Baca, Edith ^c  

^a CATIE   (Costa Rica)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Consortium for the Sustainable Development of the Andean Ecoregion ^*  (Peru)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949179474     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0186-5_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Adato, M. and S. Feldman. 2001. Safety Nets. In Quisumbing, A. and R. Meinzen-Dick (eds). Empowering women to achieve food security. Focus 6. Policy Brief 11 of 12. IFPRI. Washington D.C.
2. Adhikari, J.R. 2001. Community Based Natural Resource Management in Nepal with Reference to Community Forestry: A Gender Perspective. A Journal of the Environment, Vol. 6, No. 7: 9-22.
3. Agarwal, B. 1994. A field of one's own: gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambrigde.
4. Aguilar, L. and I. Castañeda. 2002. En bùsqueda del género perdido, equidad en áreas protegidas. San José, Ed. Absoluto. 224 p.
5. Akerkar, S. 2008. Disaster Mitigation and Furthering Women's Rights: Learning from the Tsunami. Gender Technology and Development 11(3): 357-388.
6. Amaya. N. 2008 Market access and gender roles in the Jatun Mayu watershed communities (Tiraque, Bolivia). Women in Development Discussion Series at Virginia Tech. Unpublished presentation.
7. Bosch O. J. H. , C. A. King, J. L. Herbohn, I. W. Russell and C. S. Smith. 2007. Getting the Big Picture in Natural Resource Management-Systems Thinking as 'Method' for Scientists, Policy Makers and Other Stakeholders. Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res. 24: 217-232.
8. Burchfield, S., H. Hua, D. Baral and V. Rocha. 2002. A Longitudinal Study of the Effect of Integrated Literacy and Basic Education Programs on Women's Participation in Social and Economic Development in Nepal. Girl's and Women's Education, Office of Women in Development. United States Agency for International Development.
9. Cabrera, I.R., E. Zapata Martelo and V. Vazquez Garcia. 2001. Gender, rural households, and biodiversity in native Mexico. Agriculture and Human Values 18: 85-93.
10. CATIE (Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza) 2007. CATIE's Approach to Rural Poverty Reduction. CATIE. Discussion Paper. Turrialba, Costa Rica.
11. Chambers, Robert 1997. Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.
12. CGIAR (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research). 1995. Report on the CGIAR Gender Program. Working Paper No. 11. Washington D.C.
13. Curry-Roper, Janel M. 2000. Embeddedness in Place: Its Role in the Sustainability of a Rural Farm Community in Iowa. Space and Culture 3: 204-222.
14. Chiappe, M.B. and C.B. Flora. 1998. "Gendered Elements of the Sustainable Agriculture Paradigm." Rural Sociology. 63(3): 372-393.
15. Dikito-Wachtmeister, M. S. 2001. Social Capital. In Quisumbing, A. and R. Meinzen-Dick (eds). Empowering women to achieve food security. Focus 6. Policy Brief 9 of 12. IFPRI. Washington D.C.
16. DFID. 1999. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Available from: http://www.livelihoods.org/info/info-guidancesheets.html
17. Emery, M. and C.B. Flora. 2006. "Spiraling Up: Mapping Community Transformation with Community Capitals Framework." Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society, 37: 19-35.
18. Faisal I.M. and M.R. Kabir. 2005. An Analysis of Gender-Water Nexus in Rural Bangladesh. Journal of Developing Societies 21: 175-194.
19. Fernández-Baca, E. 1996. Learning with farmers how to document resources. ILEIA Newsletter. Vol 12(1): 24-25.
20. Fernández-Baca E.C. 2006. Modernization and development as part of the globalization process: Holistic participatory community development in a community in the Mantaro Valley, Peru. PhD Dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames Iowa.
21. FIDA. 2003. La mujer como agente impulsor del cambio. Documento Temático.
22. Flora, C. B. 2000. Measuring the social dimensions of managing natural resources. In Fulton, D.C., K.C. Nelson, D.H. Anderson, and D.W. Lime (eds). Human dimensions of natural resources management: emerging issues and practical aplications. St. Paul, MN: Cooperative Park Studies Program, University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources.
23. Flora, C. B. 2001. Access and control of resources: lessons from the SANREM CRSP. Agriculture and Human Values 18(1): 41-48.
24. Flora, J. L. 1998. Social capital and communities of place. Rural Sociology 63(4): 481-506.
25. Flora, Cornelia B., J.L. Flora and S. Fey. 2004. Rural communities: legacy and change. Westview Press.
26. Fundación Arias para la Paz y el Progreso Humano 2002. De cuidadoras a propietarias: Tierra, agua y biodiversidad en América Latina. San José, Costa Rica.
27. Grewal I. and C. Kaplan, 2006. An Introduction to Women's Studies: Gender in a Transnational World. McGraw-Hill Publishers.
28. Gutiérrez-Montes, I.A. 2005. Health Community Equal Healthy Ecosystem? Evolution (And Breakdown) of a Participatory Ecological Research Project Towards a Community natural Resource Management Process, San Miguel Chimalapa, Mexico. PhD Dissertation. Department of Sociology Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.
29. Howard, P. 2003. The Major Importance of 'Minor' Resources: Women and Plant Biodiversity. Gatekeeper Series No.112. Natural Resources Group and Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods Programme. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
30. Johansen, O. B. 1991. Introducción a la teoría general de los sistemas. Limusa. Mx.
31. Karremans, J.A.M. 1994. Análisis de género, Conceptos y Métodos. CATIE. Turrialba, C.R.
32. Kelkar, M. 2007. Local Knowledge and Natural Resource Management. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, 295-306.
33. Kelkar G. and D. Nathan 1996. The Woodfuel Crisis: the Need for Gender Analysis. Bulletin of Science Technology Society. 16:122-125.
34. Meinzen-Dick, R., M. Adato, L. Haddad and P. Hazell. 2004. Science and poverty: an interdisciplinary assessment of the impact of agricultural research. Washington D.C. International Food Policy Research Institute.
35. Moghadam, Valentine M. 2005. The 'feminization of poverty' and women's human rights. Gender Equality and Development Section Division of Human Rights, Social and Human Sciences Sector UNESCO.
36. Momsen, J.H. 2007. Gender and Biodiversity: A New Approach to Linking Environment and Development. Geography Compass 1(2): 149-162.
37. Nyasimi, M.K. 2006. Changing capitals, shifting livelihoods: case study of Luo community living on Awach catchment of Lake Victoria Basin, Western Kenya. Master in Science Thesis in Anthropology and Sustainable Agriculture. Iowa State University.
38. Oever van der, P. 1991. La mujer y el manejo de los recursos naturales; qué hay de especial en esta relación?. Recursos, mujer y naturaleza. 4 (1): 5-6.
39. Paris, T. R., H.S. Feldstein, and G. Duron. 2001. Technology. In Quisumbing, A. and R. Meinzen-Dick (eds). Empowering women to achieve food security. Focus 6. Policy Brief 5 of 12. IFPRI. Washington D.C.
40. Poats, S. 2000. Género en el manejo de los recursos naturales con referencia al programa Minga del CIID. Final Report.
41. Power, J. 1993. The report on rural women living in poverty. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.
42. Quisumbing, A. and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2001. Empowering women to achieve food security: overview. In Quisumbing, A. and R. Meinzen-Dick (eds). Empowering women to achieve food security. Focus 6. Policy Brief 1 of 12. IFPRI. Washington D.C.
43. Quisumbing, A. R. and B. McClafferty. 2006. Food security in practice: Using gender research in development. International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington. D.C.
44. Revelo, A., H. Tamayoy and R. Villalobos. 1995. Género y manejo de recursos naturales. UICN. San José. C.R.
45. Sachs, C. 1996. Gendered Fields: Rural Women, Agriculture, and Environment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
46. Schmink, M. 1998. Marco Conceptual para el Análisis de Género y Conservación con Base Comunitaria. IN: Poats, S., Arroyo, P. Y R. Asar, (Eds.) Genero y Manejo Sustentable de Recursos: Examinando los Resultados. Proc. of MERGE Program International Conference. Quito, Ecuador: FLACSO/MacArthur Foundation.
47. Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods. A Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper 72. Brighton, UK: IDS. Available from: http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/bookshop/wp/Wp72.pdf
48. Sharma, M. 2001. Microfinance. In Quisumbing, A. and R. Meinzen-Dick (eds). Empowering women to achieve food security. Focus 6. Policy Brief 10 of 12. IFPRI. Washington D.C.
49. Valdivia, C. 2001. Gender, livestock assets, resource management, and food security: lessons from the SR-CRSP. Agriculture and Human Values 18(1): 27-39.
50. Valdivia, C. y J. Gilles.2001. Gender and resource management: Households and groups, strategies and transitions. Agriculture and Human Values 18: 5-9.
51. Wagle, U. 2002. Rethinking Poverty: Definition and Measurement. International Social Science Journal. 54(171): 155-165.
52. Westermann, O., J. Ashby and J. Pretty. 2005. Gender and Social capital: the importance of gender difference for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Development 33(11):1783-1799.
53. Zwarteveen, M. and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2001. Gender and property rights in the commons: Examples of water rights in South Asia. Agriculture and Human Values 18: 11-25.