The extended composer creative reflection and extension with generative tools

Computers and Creativity

Volumn 9783642317279, Issue , 2012, Pages 175-203

  Jones, Daniel ^a   Brown, Andrew R ^b   D'Inverno, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS;

BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES; CREATIVE PROCESS; CREATIVES; DEGREE OF AUTONOMY; GENERATIVE TOOLS; HUMAN-COMPUTER PARTNERSHIPS; INTERACTIVE TOOL; MUSICAL COMPOSITION;

MUSIC;

EID: 84949177109     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31727-9_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Ames, C. (1987). Automated composition in retrospect: 1956-1986. Leonardo, 20(2), 169-185.
2. André, P., Schraefel, M. C., Teevan, J., & Dumais, S. T. (2009). Discovery is never by chance: designing for (un)serendipity. In C&C'09: proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on creativity and cognition (pp. 305-314). New York: ACM.
3. Beilhartz, K., & Ferguson, S. (2007). Gestural hyper instrument collaboration with generative computation for real time creativity. In Creativity and cognition (pp. 213-222). Washington: ACM.
4. Berry, R., & Dahlstedt, P. (2003). Artificial life: why should musicians bother? Contemporary Music Review, 22(3), 57-67.
5. Biles, J. (1994). GenJam: A genetic algorithm for generating jazz solos. In Proceedings of the international computer music conference (pp. 131-137).
6. Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. New York: Routledge.
7. Bown, O. (2009). Against individual creativity. In Dagstuhl seminar proceedings 09291. Computational creativity: an interdisciplinary approach, Dagstuhl, Germany.
8. Bown, O., & Lexer, S. (2006). Continuous-time recurrent neural networks for generative and interactive musical performance. In Lecture notes in computer science. Proceedings of EvoWorkshops 2006 (pp. 652-663). Berlin: Springer.
9. Brown, A. R. (2000). Modes of compositional engagement. Mikropolyphonie, 6. http://pandora.nla.gov.au/tep/10054.
10. Brown, A. R. (2001). How the computer assists composers: a survey of contemporary practice. In G. Munro (Ed.), Waveform 2001: the Australasian computer music conference (pp. 9-16). The Australasian computer music association.
11. Brown, A. R. (2002). Opportunities for evolutionary music composition. In Proceedings of the Australasian computer music conference (pp. 27-34).
12. Cage, J. (1968). Silence: lectures and writings. London: Calder and Boyars.
13. Chadabe, J. (1984). Interactive composing: an overview. Computer Music Journal, 8(1), 22-27.
14. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
17. Cohen, H. (1995). The further exploits of AARON, painter. Stanford Humanities Review, 4(2), 141-158.
18. Cole, T., & Cole, P. (2008) Noatikl. http://www.intermorphic.com/tools/noatikl/index.html.
19. Collins, N. (2009). Introduction to computer music. Chichester: Wiley.
20. Cope, D. (1996). Experiments in musical intelligence. Madison: A-R Editions.
21. Cope, D. (2008). Hidden structure: music analysis using computers. Madison: A-R Editions.
22. Cornock, S., & Edmonds, E. (1973). The creative process where the artist is amplified or superseded by the computer. Leonardo, 6(1), 11-16.
23. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). Flow: the psychology of happiness. London: Rider Books.
24. De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity: using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. London: Harper Collins.
25. Dean, R. (2003). Hyperimprovisation: computer-interactive sound improvisation. Middleton: A-R Editions.
26. Dennett, D. (2001). Collision detection, muselot, and scribbles: some reflections on creativity. In D. Cope (Ed.), Virtual music: computer synthesis of musical style (pp. 282-291). Cambridge: MIT Press.
27. d'Inverno, M., & Luck, M. (2004). Understanding agent systems. Springer series on agent technology. Berlin: Springer.
28. Eno, B. (1996). Generative music. http://www.inmotionmagazine.com/eno1.html.
29. Eno, B., & Schmidt, P. (1975). Oblique strategies: over 100 worthwhile dilemmas by Brian Eno and Peter Schmidt. London: Apollo.
30. Essl, K. (1992). Lexikon sonate. http://www.essl.at/sounds.html#lexson-porgy.
31. Galanter, P. (2003). What is generative art? complexity theory as a context for art theory. In GA2003-6th generative art conference.
32. Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34. Gudmundsdottir, B. (1996). Björk meets Karlheinz Stockhausen. Dazed and Confused, 23.
35. Hedemann, C., Sorensen, A., & Brown, A. R. (2008). Metascore: user interface design for generative film scoring. In Proceedings of the Australasian computer music conference (pp. 25-30). Australasian computer music association.
36. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper & Row.
37. Hiller, L. (1968). Music composed with computer[s]: an historical survey. Experimental Music Studio.
38. Hiller, L. A., & Isaacson, L. M. (1958). Musical composition with a high-speed digital computer. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 6(3), 154-160.
39. Hodges, A. (1985). Alan Turing: the enigma of intelligence. London: Unwin Paperbacks.
40. Huron, D. (2006). Sweet anticipation: music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
41. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviality. London: Valder & Boyars.
42. Jewell, M. O., Rhodes, C., & d'Inverno, M. (2010). Querying improvised music: do you sound like yourself? In ISMIR 2010, Utrecht, NL (pp. 483-488).
43. Jones, D. (2008). AtomSwarm: a framework for swarm improvisation. In Lecture notes in computer science. Proceedings of EvoWorkshops 2008 (pp. 423-432). Berlin: Springer.
44. Jones, D., Matthias, J., Hodgson, T., Outram, N., Grant, J., & Ryan, N. (2009). The fragmented orchestra. In Proceedings of new interfaces for musical expression (NIME 2009) conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
45. Jordà, S., Geiger, G., Alonso, M., & Kaltenbrunner, M. (2007). The reactable: exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proceedings of the first international conference on tangible and embedded interaction (TEI) (pp. 139-146). New York: ACM Press.
46. Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
47. Klee, P. (1972). Pedagogical sketchbook. London: Faber and Faber.
48. Kostelanetz, R. (1989). Conversing with cage. London: Omnibus.
49. Laske, O. (1981). Composition theory in Koenig's project one and project two. Computer Music Journal, 5(3), 54-65.
50. Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29-64.
51. Lewis, G. (2007). On creative machines. In N. Collins & J. d'Escriván (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to electronic music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Lewis, G. E. (2000). Too many notes: computers, complexity and culture in voyager. Leonardo Music Journal, 10, 33-39.
53. Lubart, T. (2005). How can computers be partners in the creative process. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4-5), 365-369.
54. Magnusson, T. (2009). Of epistemic tools: musical instruments as cognitive extensions. Organised Sound, 14(2), 168-176.
55. Matthews, H., & Brotchie, A. (2005). The Oulipo compendium. London: Atlas Press.
56. McCormack, J. (1996). Grammar based music composition. In R. Stocker, H. Jelinek, B. Durnota & T. Bossomaier (Eds.), Complex systems 96: from local interactions to global phenomena (pp. 321-336). Amsterdam: ISO Press.
57. McCormack, J. (2003). Evolving sonic ecosystems. Kybernetes, 32(1/2), 184-202.
58. McCormack, J., McIlwain, P., Lane, A., & Dorin, A. (2008). Generative composition with nodal. In E. Miranda (Ed.), Workshop on music and artificial life (part of ECAL 2007), Lisbon, Portugal.
59. McCullough, M. (1996). Abstracting craft: the practiced digital hand. Cambridge: MIT Press.
60. McGraw, G., & Hofstadter, D. (1993). Perception and creation of diverse alphabetic styles. AISB Quarterly, 85, 42-49.
61. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: the extensions of man. London: Sphere Books.
62. Miranda, E. R., & Matthias, J. (2005). Granular sampling using a Pulse-Coupled network of spiking neurons. In Lecture notes in computer science. Proceedings of EvoWorkshops 2005 (pp. 539-544). Berlin: Springer.
63. Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Nierhaus, G. (2009). Algorithmic composition: paradigms of automatic music generation. Vienna: Springer.
65. Norman, D. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Ortolani, B. (1990). The Japanese theatre: from shamanistic ritual to contemporary pluralism. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
67. Pachet, F. (2003). The continuator: musical interaction with style. Journal of New Music Research, 32(3), 333-341.
68. Pólya, G. (1971). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
69. Prévost, E. (2004). Minute particulars: meanings in music-making in the wake of hierarchial realignments and other essays. London: Copula.
70. Pritchett, J. (1993). The music of John Cage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Rowe, R. (1993). Interactive music systems: machine listening and composing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
72. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Group creativity: musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148-165.
73. Smith, H., & Dean, R. (1997). Improvisation, hypermedia and the arts since 1945. Amsterdam: Harwood.
74. Spiegel, L. (1981). Manipulations of musical patterns. In Proceedings of the symposium on small computers and the arts (pp. 19-22).
75. Supper, M. (2001). A few remarks on algorithmic composition. Computer Music Journal, 25(1), 48-53.
76. Temperley, D. (2007). Music and probability. Cambridge: MIT Press.
77. van Andel, P. (1994). Anatomy of the unsought finding. Serendipity: origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(2), 631-648.
78. Wiggins, G., Papadopoulos, G., Phon-Amnuaisuk, S., & Tuson, A. (1999). Evolutionary methods for musical composition. In D. M. Dubois (Ed.), Partial proceedings of the first international conference CASYS'97 on computing anticipatory systems, Liége, Belgium, August 11-15, 1997. International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems.
79. Wiggins, G., Pearce, M., & Mullensiefen, D. (2009). Computational modelling of music cognition and musical creativity. In R. Dean (Ed.), Oxford handbook of computer music (pp. 383-420). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80. Winkler, T. (1998). Composing interactive music. Cambridge: MIT Press.
81. Woolhouse, M. (2009). Modelling tonal attraction between adjacent musical elements. Journal of New Music Research, 38(4).
82. Xenakis, I. (2001). Formalized music: thought and mathematics in composition. Hillsdale: Pendragon Press.
83. Young, L. M. (Ed.) (1963). An anthology of chance operations. New York: La Monte Young and Jackson Mac Low.
84. Young, M. (2008). NN music: improvising with a 'living' computer. In R. Kronland-Martinet (Ed.), Computer music modelling and retrieval: sense of sounds (pp. 337-350). Vienna: Springer.