The role of controlled and dynamic process environments in group decision making: An exploratory study

Simulation and Gaming

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 54-68

  Dasgupta, Subhasish ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

group decision making; group decision support systems; Internet mediated simulations; process environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949116353     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: 1552826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399702250467     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Developments in business simulation and experiential exercises. Stillwater: Oklahoma University Press; 1989:132-135.
2. An empirical investigation of multicriteria group decision models in a simulation/gaming context.Simulation & Gaming. 1990;21 (1): 27-47
3. An experiment assessing group support systems and facilitator effects on meeting outcomes.Management Science. 1995;41 (2): 189-208
4. An evaluation of empirical research in Managerial Support Systems.Decision Support Systems. 1990;6 (3): 203-226
5. The role of information in a functional business game.Simulation & Games. 1976;7 (1): 53-64
6. Identifying organizational opportunities for GDSS use: Some experimental evidence.Decision Support Systems. 1987;3:68-75
7. A study of the relationship between Jungian personality dimensions and conflict handling behavior.Human Relations. 1984;37 (10): 863-879
8. Ackoff's management misinformation systems empirically revisited via simulation.Simulation & Games. 1986;17 (1): 60-74
9. Some effects of business gaming of previous quasi-T group afflictions.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1967;51 (5): 426-431
10. Foundation for the study of group decision support systems.Management Science. 1987;33:589-609
11. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. New Jersey: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1989:337-343.
12. What management games do best.Business Horizons. 1961;4 (3): 55-64
13. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. New Jersey: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1989:344-352.
14. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. New Jersey: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1989:370-377.
15. Insights into experiential pedagogy. Tempe: Arizona State University; 1979:25-28.
16. Computer-based support for problem finding: An experimental investigation.Management Information Systems Quarterly. 1988;12:277-296
17. Group size and attitudes toward simulation experience.Simulation & Games. 1980;11:451-460
18. A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support.Information Systems Research. 1990;1:394-415
19. Proceedings of the Southeastern AIDS Conference. Atlanta, GA: Decision Sciences Institute; 1972:193-198.
20. Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences.Human Communications Research. 1986;13:225-252
21. Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload.Communications of ACM. 1985;28:680-689
22. Experiments in group decision making, Disinhibition, deindividualization, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences.Decision Support Systems. 1988;5:217-232
23. Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment.Management Information Systems Quarterly. 1988;12:645-665
24. Jessup, L.M., & Valacich, J.S. (1991, November). Group Support Systems: Implications for multidisciplinary theory building. Unpublished manuscript presented at the ORSA/TIMS Joint National Meeting, Anaheim, CA.
25. Decision support package in a business game: Performance and attitudinal effects.Simulation & Games. 1988;19 (4): 440-452
26. Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making.ACM Computing Surveys. 1988;20 (2): 115-146
27. Influences on learning in simulation games.American Behavioral Scientist. 1966;10 (2): 28-32
28. Development in business simulation and experiential exercises. Normal: Illinois State University; 1985:228-231.
29. The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management.Journal of Management Information Systems. 1994;10 (3): 63-95
30. Group variables and gaming success.Simulation & Games. 1980;11 (3): 73-85
31. Facilitating group creativity: Experience with a group support system.Journal of Management Information Systems. 1987;3:6-19
32. Computer-aided deliberation: Model management and group decision support.Operations Research. 1988;6:826-848
33. Variations in decision makers' use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information.Academy of Management Journal. 1982;25 (4): 756-771
34. The effects of electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: An assessment of empirical research.European Journal of Operations Research. 1990;46:143-161
35. An experimental evaluation of the relationship of uncertainty in the environment to information used by decision makers.Decision Sciences. 1975;6:556-567
36. Group process in computer-mediated communication.Organization Behavior & Human Decision Processes. 1986;37:157-187
37. A computer-based interactive system for group decision making.IEEE Transactions. 1981;11:544-552
38. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967:
39. Modern organizations. New York: Knopf; 1961:
40. The effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy and consensus inquiry methods in a GSS environment.Information & Management. 1993;25 (1): 33-41
41. Computer support for group versus individual decisions.IEEE Transactions Communications. 1982;30:82-90
42. Use of a performance evaluation model for research in business gaming.Academy of Management Journal. 1967;10 (1): 27-37
43. Group decision support impact: Multimethodological exploration.Conference on Technology and Cooperative Work; Tucson, AZ;.
44. Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences.MIS Quarterly. 1988;12:463-478
45. The effects and effectiveness of simulations in business policy making teaching applications.Academy of Management Review. 1976;1 (2): 47-56
46. Team building study.Simulation & Games. 1989;20 (4): 388-408
47. Team cohesion effects on business game performance.Simulation & Games. 1988;19:82-98
48. Team-size effects on business game performance and decision making behaviors.Decision Sciences. 1983;14:121-133
49. A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making.Management Information Systems Quarterly. 1988;12:625-644