Urban flood modelling combining top-view LiDAR data with ground-view SfM observations

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 75, Issue , 2015, Pages 105-117

  Meesuk, Vorawit ^a,b   Vojinovic, Zoran ^a   Mynett, Arthur E ^a,c   Abdullah, Ahmad F ^d  

^a UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

^b Hydro and Agro Informatics Institute   (Thailand)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Digital terrain model (DTM); High resolution topographic information; Light detection and ranging (LiDAR); Multidimensional fusion of views (MFV); Structure from motion (SfM); Urban flood modelling (UFM)

Indexed keywords

FLOODS; LANDFORMS; MAPS; REMOTE SENSING; TEMPERATURE CONTROL;

DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL; LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING; MULTIDIMENSIONAL FUSION OF VIEWS (MFV); STRUCTURE FROM MOTION; TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; URBAN FLOOD MODELLING;

OPTICAL RADAR;

DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL; EXTREME EVENT; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODING; LIDAR; NUMERICAL MODEL; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING; URBAN PLANNING; WATER DEPTH;

KUALA LUMPUR [WEST MALAYSIA]; MALAYSIA; WEST MALAYSIA;

EID: 84949115661     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abdullah AF, Rahman A, Vojinovic Z. LiDAR filtering algorithms for urban flood application: review on current algorithms and filters test. In: 8th International conference on urban drainage modelling. Tokyo, Japan; 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2011.009.
2. Abdullah A.F., Vojinović Z., Price R.K., Aziz N.A.A. Improved methodology for processing raw LiDAR data to support urban flood modelling - accounting for elevated roads and bridges. J Hydroinform 2012, 14(2):253-269. 10.2166/hydro.2011.009.
3. Abdullah A.F., Vojinović Z., Price R.K., Aziz N.A.A. A methodology for processing raw LiDAR data to support urban flood modelling framework. J Hydroinform 2012, 14(1):75-92. 10.2166/hydro.2011.089.
4. Boonya-aroonnet S. Applications of the innovative modelling of urban surface flooding in the UK case studies. In: 11th International conference on urban drainage, Edinburgh, UK; 2010.
5. Casas A., Riaño D., Greenberg J., Ustin S. Assessing levee stability with geometric parameters derived from airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ 2012, 117:281-288. 10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.003.
6. Chen A.S., Hsu M.H., Teng W.H., Huang C.J., Yeh S.H., Lien W.Y. Establishing the database of inundation potential in Taiwan. Nat Hazards 2006, 37:107-132. 10.1007/s11069-005-4659-7.
7. Chen A.S., Evans B., Djordjević S., Savić D.A. Multi-layered coarse grid modelling in 2D urban flood simulations. J Hydrol 2012, 470-471:1-11. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.022.
8. Chow V.T. Open-channel hydraulics 1959, McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Clarke T.A., Fryer J.G. The development of camera calibration methods and models. Photogramm Rec 1998, 16(91):51-66. 10.1111/0031-868X.00113.
10. Cunge J.A., Holly F.M., Verwey A. Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics: monographs and surveys in water resources engineering 1980, Pitman Publishing Ltd, London.
11. DHI Water & Environment. Klang River-basin environment improvement and flood mitigation project (Stormwater Management and Road Tunnel - SMART). Final report. Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Malaysia; 2004.
12. Djordjević S., Prodanović D., Walters G. Simulation of transcritical flow in pipe/channel networks. J Hydraul Eng 2004, 130:1167-1178. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:12(1167).
13. Evans E.P., Simm J.D., Thorne C.R., Arnell N.W., Hess T.M., Lane S.N. The Pitt review: an update of the foresight future flooding 2004 qualitative risk analysis 2008, Cabinet Office, London.
14. Fewtrell T.J., Duncan A., Sampson C.C., Neal J.C., Bates P.D. Benchmarking urban flood models of varying complexity and scale using high resolution terrestrial LiDAR data. Phys Chem Earth Pt A/B/C 2011, 36(7-8):281-291. 10.1016/j.pce.2010.12.011.
15. Goesele M, Snavely N, Curless B, Hoppe H, Seitz SM. Multi-view stereo for community photo collections. In: IEEE 11th ICCV. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408933.
16. Hai P.T., Magome J., Yorozuya A., Inomata H., Fukami K., Takeuchi K. Large-scale flooding analysis in the suburbs of Tokyo Metropolis caused by levee breach of the Tone River using a 2D hydrodynamic model. Water Sci Technol 2010, 62:1859-1864. 10.2166/wst.2010.381.
17. Haile AT, Rientjes TH. Effects of LiDAR DEM resolution in flood modelling: a model sensitivity study for the city of Tegucigalpa, Honduras. In: 36th ISPRS workshop 'laser scanning'. Enschede, The Netherlands; 2005.
18. Hervouet J, Janin J. Finite element algorithms for modelling flood propagation. In: Proceedings, modelling of flood propagation over initially dry areas. Milan, Italy; 1994.
19. Hervouet J., Van Haren L. Recent advances in numerical methods for fluid flow. Floodplain processes 1996, 183-214. Wiley, Chichester. M.G. Anderson, D.E. Walling, D.B. Paul (Eds.).
20. Hestholm S., Ruud B. 2D finite-difference elastic wave modelling including surface topography. Geophys Prospect 1994, 42:371-390. 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00216.x.
21. Horritt M.S., Bates P.D. Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow. J Hydrol 2001, 253:239-249. 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00490-5.
22. Hsu M.H., Chen S.H., Chang T.J. Inundation simulation for urban drainage basin with storm sewer system. J Hydrol 2000, 234:21-37. 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00237-7.
23. Hunter N.M., Bates P.D., Neelz S., Pender G., Villanueva I., Wright N.G., Liang D., Falconer R.A., Lin B., Waller S. Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flooding. P Ice-water Manage 2008, 161:13-30. 10.1680/wama.2008.161.1.13.
24. Irschara A., Zach C., Klopschitz M., Bischof H. Large-scale, dense city reconstruction from user-contributed photos. Comput Vis Image Und 2012, 116(1):2-15. 10.1016/j.cviu.2011.07.010.
25. Jancosek M, Pajdla T. Multi-view reconstruction preserving weakly-supported surfaces. In: IEEE conference on CVPR, CO, USA; 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995693.
26. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vision 2004, 60:91-110. 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94.
27. Luscombe B.W., Hassan H.M. Applying remote sensing technologies to natural disaster risk management: implications for developmental investments. Acta Astronaut 1993, 29(10-11):871-876. 10.1016/0094-5765(93)90169-W.
28. Mark O., Weesakul S., Apirumanekul C., Boonya-aroonnet S., Djordjević S. Potential and limitations of 1D modelling of urban flooding. J Hydrol 2004, 299:284-299. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.014.
29. Marks K., Bates P.D. Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrol Process 2000, 14:2109-2122. 10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<2109::AID-HYP58>3.0.CO;2-1.
30. Mitasova H, Hardin E, Starek MJ, Harmon RS, Overton MF, Hengl T, Evans I, Wilson J, Gould M. Landscape dynamics from LiDAR data time series. In: Geomorphometry. CA, USA; 2011.
31. Neal J.C., Bates P.D., Fewtrell T.J., Hunter N.M., Wilson M.D., Horritt M.S. Distributed whole city water level measurements from the Carlisle 2005 urban flood event and comparison with hydraulic model simulations. J Hydrol 2009, 368:42-55. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.026.
32. Puente I., González-Jorge H., Martínez-Sánchez J., Arias P. Review of mobile mapping and surveying technologies. Measurement 2013, 46:2127-2145. 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.03.006.
33. Razafison U., Cordier S., Delestre O., Darboux F., Lucas C., James F. A shallow water model for the numerical simulation of overland flow on surfaces with ridges and furrows. Eur J Mech B-Fluids 2012, 31:44-52. 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2011.07.002.
34. Remondino F., El-Hakim S. Image-based 3D modelling: a review. Photogramm Rec 2006, 21(115):269-291. 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2006.00383.x.
35. Rychkov I., Brasington J., Vericat D. Computational and methodological aspects of terrestrial surface analysis based on point clouds. Comput Geosci 2012, 42:64-70. 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.011.
36. Sampson C.C., Fewtrell T.J., Duncan A., Shaad K., Horritt M.S., Bates P.D. Use of terrestrial laser scanning data to drive decimetric resolution urban inundation models. Adv Water Resour 2012, 41:1-17. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.010.
37. Schelfault K., Pannemans B., Van Der Craasts I., Krywkow J., Mysiak J., Cools J. Bringing flood resilience into practice: the FREEMAN project. Environ Sci Policy 2014, 14(7):825-833. 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.009.
38. Schubert J.E., Sanders B.F., Smith M.J., Wright N.G. Unstructured mesh generation and landcover-based resistance for hydrodynamic modeling of urban flooding. Adv Water Resour 2008, 31(12):1603-1621. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.07.012.
39. Schubert J.E., Sanders B.F. Building treatments for urban flood inundation models and implications for predictive skill and modeling efficiency. Adv Water Resour 2012, 41:49-64. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.012.
40. Smeeckaert J., Mallet C., David N., Chehata N., Ferraz A. Large-scale classification of water areas using airborne topographic LiDAR data. Remote Sens Environ 2013, 138:134-148. 10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.004.
41. Smith D.I. Actual and potential flood damage: a case study for urban Lismore, NSW, Australia. Appl Geogr 1981, 1(1):31-39. 10.1016/0143-6228(81)90004-7.
42. Smith R.A.E., Bates P.D., Hayes C. Evaluation of a coastal flood inundation model using hard and soft data. Environ Modell Softw 2012, 30:35-46. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.008.
43. Snavely N, Seitz SM, Szeliski R. Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3D. In: Proceedings, ACM SIGGRAPH; 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1179352.1141964.
44. Snavely N, Simon I, Goesele M, Szeliski R, Seitz SM. Scene reconstruction and visualization from community photo collections. In: Proceedings of the IEEE; 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2049330.
45. Stelling G, Kernkamp H, Laguzzi M. Delft flooding system: a powerful tool for inundation assessment based upon a positive flow simulation. In: HIC. Copenhagen, Denmark; 1998.
46. Tsubaki R., Fujita I. Unstructured grid generation using LiDAR data for urban flood inundation modelling. Hydrol Process 2010, 24(11):1404-1420. 10.1002/hyp.7608.
47. Tuite K, Snavely N, Hsiao D, Tabing N, Popovic Z. PhotoCity: training experts at large-scale image acquisition through a competitive game. In: Proceedings, CHI; 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979146.
48. Vojinović Z., Tutulic D. On the use of 1D and coupled 1D-2D modelling approaches for assessment of flood damage in urban areas. Urban Water J 2009, 6:183-199. 10.1080/15730620802566877.
49. Vojinović Z., Seyoum S.D., Mwalwaka J.M., Price R.K. Effects of model schematisation, geometry and parameter values on urban flood modelling. Water Sci Technol 2011, 63:462-467. 10.2166/wst.2011.244.
50. Vojinović Z., Abbott M.B. Flood risk and social justice: from quantitative to qualitative flood risk assessment and mitigation 2012, IWA Publishing, London.
51. Vojinović Z., Seyoum S., Salum M.H., Price R.K., Abdullah A.F., Abebe Y. Modelling floods in urban areas and representation of buildings with a method based on adjusted conveyance and storage characteristics. J Hydroinform 2013, 15(4):1150-1168. 10.2166/hydro.2012.181.
52. Wang C.K., Philpot W.D. Using airborne bathymetric LiDAR to detect bottom type variation in shallow waters. Remote Sens Environ 2007, 106:123-135. 10.1016/j.rse.2006.08.003.
53. Wendel A, Maurer M, Graber G, Pock T, Bischof H. Dense reconstruction on-the-fly. In: 2012 IEEE conference on CVPR. RI, USA; 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247833.
54. Westoby M.J., Brasington J., Glasser N.F., Hambrey M.J., Reynolds J.M. 'Structure-from-motion' photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 2012, 179:300-314. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021.
55. Wu CC. SiftGPU: a GPU implementation of scale invaraint feature transform (SIFT), 2007. [accessed January 2014]. http://cs.unc.edu/~ccwu/siftgpu.
56. Wu CC, Agarwal S, Curless B, Seitz SM. Multicore bundle adjustment. In: IEEE international conference on CVPR. CO, USA; 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995552.
57. Wu CC. VisualSFM: a visual structure from motion system. [accessed January 2014]. .