Emerging technologies in civil security-A scenario-based analysis

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 101, Issue , 2015, Pages 226-237

  Bierwisch, Antje ^a   Kayser, Victoria ^a   Shala, Erduana ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Foresight; Scenario technique; Security technology; Societal needs; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

FORESIGHT; SCENARIO TECHNIQUE; SECURITY TECHNOLOGY; SOCIETAL NEEDS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS;

MOBILE SECURITY;

INNOVATION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SECURITY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EUROPE;

EID: 84949106514     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bierwisch A., Seitz R., Grandt S. The innovation system of security: a new quality in the relationship between political, economic and social actors. Innovation System Revisited 2012, 129-152. Experiences from 40years of Fraunhofer ISI research, Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart. Fraunhofer ISI (Ed.).
2. Bierwisch A., Grandt S., Kayser V. Report on Development and Application of an Economic Model concerning High Risk/High Payoff: Socio-economic Model for the Assessment of Emerging Security Technologies. Deliverable 6.2, ETCETERA Project-Evaluation of Critical and Emerging Technologies for the Elaboration of a Security Research Agenda 2013, (October, http://www.etcetera-project.eu/deliverables/index.html, accessed 17-03-2015).
3. Bierwisch A., Kayser V., Grandt S., Shala E., Dönitz E. Future Security Scenarios 2030-Assessment of Civil Emerging Security Technologies 2015, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe, (forthcoming).
4. BMWi Zukunftsmarkt Zivile Sicherheit. Industriepolitische Konzeption des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie 2010, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Berlin, (Online: http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Navigation/Service/publikationen,did=369604.html, accessed 18-04-2012).
5. Brown J. A Resource Guide for Hosting Conversations that Matter at the World Café 2002, Whole Systems Associates.
6. Brown J., Isaacs D. The World Café: Shaping our Futures through Conversations that Matter 2005, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.
7. Burbiel J., Schietke R. Recommendations for an Emerging Security Technology Research Agenda (ESTRA). Deliverable D6.1, ETCETERA Project-Evaluation of Critical and Emerging Technologies for the Elaboration of a Security Research Agenda 2013, (http://www.etcetera-project.eu/deliverables/index.html, accessed 17-03-2015).
8. Burt G. Why are we surprised at surprises? Integrating disruption theory and system analysis with the scenario methodology to help identify disruptions and discontinuities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2007, 74(6):731-749.
9. Buzan B., Weaver O. Macrosecuritisation and security constellations: reconsidering scale in securitization theory. Rev. Int. Stud. 2009, 35:253-276.
10. Cavoukian A. Privacy by Design 2009, 1. Information & Privacy Commissioner, (available at http://www.ipc.on.ca/images/Resources/privacybydesign.pdf).
11. Christou G., Croft S., Ceccorulli M., Lucarelli S. European Union security governance: putting the 'security' back in. Eur. Sec. 2010, 19:341-359.
12. Cuhls K. Methoden der Technikvorausschau-eine internationale Übersicht 2008, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart.
13. Daase C. Der Wandel der Sicherheitskultur-Ursachen und Folgen des erweiterten Sicherheitsbegriffs. Zivile Sicherheit. Gesellschaftliche Dimensionen gegenwärtiger Sicherheitspolitiken 2011, 139-158. transcript Verlag, Bielefeld. P. Zoche, S. Kaufmann, R. Haverkamp (Eds.).
14. Davis F. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems-Theory and Results 1985, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
15. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13(3):319-339.
16. Di Stefano G., Gambardella A., Verona G. Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: current findings and future research restrictions. Res. Policy 2012, 41:1283-1295.
17. Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., Soete L. Technological Change and Economic Theory 1988, Pinter Publishers, London.
18. Edquist C. Systems of innovation. Perspectives and challenges. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation 2005, 181-208. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (Eds.).
19. European Commission The EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five Steps Towards More Secure Europe 2010, European Commission, Brussels, (COM(2010) 673 final).
20. European Commission An integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era Putting Competitiveness and Sustainability at Centre Stage 2010, European Commission, Brussels, (COM(2010) 614 final).
21. European Commission Security Industrial Policy-Action Plan for an Innovative and Competitive Security Industry 2012, European Commission, Brussels, (COM(2012) 417 final).
22. European Commission Public Consultation on the preparation of a new Communication on an Industrial Policy for the Security Industry 2012, European Commission, Brussels, (http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/security/files/doc/public_consultation/background_document_en.pdf, assessed 17-03-2015).
23. European Commission Horizon 2020-Work Programme 2014-2015, 14. Secure societies-Protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens 2014, European Commission Decision, Brussel, (C(2014)4995 of 22 July 2014).
24. Gausemeier J., Stollt G. Szenarien für die deutsche Werkzeugmaschinen-Industrie. Strategische Technologieplanung mit Zukunftsszenarien 2008, 49-82. Methoden, Hilfsmittel, Beispiele, VDMA Verlag, Frankfurt a.M. J. Gausemeier, S. Kinkel (Eds.).
25. Gausemeier J., Fink A., Schlake O. Szenario-Management. Planen und Führen mit Szenarien 1996, Carl Hanser, München. 2nd edition.
26. Georghiou L. The UK technology foresight programme. Futures 1996, 28(4):359-377.
27. Godet M., Chapuy P., Comyn G. Global scenarios: geopolitical and economic context to the year 2000. Futures 1994, 26(3):275-288.
28. Graf H.G. Globale Szenarien: Megatrends im weltweiten Kräftespiel 2000, Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch, Frankfurt am Main.
29. Hirsch B. Gesellschaftliche Folgen staatlicher Überwachung. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 2008, 2:87-91.
30. Horton A. A simple guide to successful foresight. Foresight 1999, 1(1):5-9.
31. Hough P. Understanding Global Security 2004, Routledge, London/New York.
32. Lallart M., Priya S., Bressers S., Inman D.J. Small-scale piezoelectric energy harvesting devices using low-energy-density sources. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2010, 57(4):947-951.
33. Lin C.A. An interactive communication technology adoption model. Commun. Theory 2003, 13(4):345-365.
34. Lowrance William W. The relation of science and technology to human values. Technology and Values 2010, 38-49. Essential Readings, Malden/Oxford/West Sussex. C. Hanks (Ed.).
35. Lundvall B.A. National System of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning 1986, Anthem Press, London.
36. Martin B.R. Foresight in science and technology. Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag. 1995, 7(2):139-168.
37. Martin B.R., Johnston R. Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1999, 60(1):37-54.
38. Miles I. The development of technology foresight: a review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77(8):1448-1456.
39. Miller L.E. Indoor Navigation for First Responders-A Feasibility Study 2006, Wireless Communication Technologies Group, Advanced Networking Technologies Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, (February).
40. Mowery D., Rosenberg N. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Res. Policy 1979, 8(2):102-153.
41. Nagenborg M. Das Private unter den Rahmenbedingungen der IuK-Technologie, Wiesbaden 2005.
42. Nagenborg M. Ethik als Partner in der Technikgestaltung. Verantwortung in Technik und Ökonomie 2009, 101-115. Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe. M. Maring (Ed.).
43. Postma T.J.B.M., Liebl F. How to improve scenario analysis as a strategic management tool. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2005, 72:161-173.
44. Reibnitz U. Szenario-Technik: Instrumente für die unternehmerische und persönliche Erfolgsplanung 1991, Gabler, Wiesbaden.
45. Ryan M.D. Cloud computing security: the scientific challenge, and a survey of solutions. J. Syst. Softw. 2013, 86(9):2263-2268.
46. Salo A., Cuhls K. Technology foresight-past and future. J. Forecast. 2003, 22:79-83.
47. Savage S., Pohl A., Levin B., Khan M., Noquet D., Canet G., Lotero J.H., Pino J.L., Revelin S., Bonfanti M., Ruhlig K., Huppertz G. Intermediate report on emerging technologies. Deliverable D5.1, ETCETERA Project-Evaluation of Critical and Emerging Technologies for the Elaboration of a Security Research Agenda 2013, (http://www.etcetera-project.eu/deliverables/index.html, accessed 17-03-2015).
48. Schomaker P.J.H. Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Manag. Rev. 1995, 25-40. (Winter).
49. Streeten P. Basic needs and human rights. World Dev. 1980, 8:107-111.
50. von Hippel E. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res. Policy 1976, 5(3):212-239.
51. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields 2011, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. R. von Schomberg (Ed.).
52. Weppner B., Huppertz G., Pino L. List of Emerging Technologies with Security Implications. Deliverable D4.1, ETCETERA Project-Evaluation of Critical and Emerging Technologies for the Elaboration of a Security Research Agenda 2012, (http://www.etcetera-project.eu/deliverables/index.html, accessed 17-03-2015).
53. Wilms F.E.P. Szenarien sind Systeme. Szenariotechnik 2006, 39-60. Fachhochschule Voralberg, Forschungszentrum Prozess- und Produkt-Engineering, Bern, Stuttgart, Wien. F.E.P. Wilms (Ed.).