Mind the gap: A classification system for integrating the subsolum into soil surveys

Geoderma

Volumn 264, Issue , 2016, Pages 332-339

  Juilleret, Jérôme ^a   Dondeyne, Stefaan ^b   Vancampenhout, Karen ^b   Deckers, Jozef ^b   Hissler, Christophe ^a  

^a LUXEMBOURG INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Luxembourg)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bedrock; Regolite; Saprock; Saprolite; Soil Taxonomy; World Reference Base

Indexed keywords

ROCKS; SOIL SURVEYS; TAXONOMIES; WATER QUALITY; WEATHERING;

BEDROCK; REGOLITE; SAPROCK; SAPROLITE; SOIL TAXONOMY; WORLD REFERENCE BASE;

SOILS;

BEDROCK; LITHOLOGY; SOIL CLASSIFICATION; SOIL HORIZON; SOIL SURVEY; SUBSTRATE; TAXONOMY; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84949097646     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.031     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson S., Blum J., Brantley S., Chadwick O., Chorover J., Derry L.A., Drever J.I., Hering J.G., Kirchner J.W., Kump L.R., Richter D., White A.F. Proposed initiative would study Earth's Weathering Engine. Eos 2004, 85-28:265-272.
2. Brady N.C., Weil R. The Nature and Properties of Soils 2008, Pearson Prentice Hall. 14th edition.
3. Brevik E.C., Fenton T.E. Improved mapping of the Lake Agassiz Herman strandline by integrating geological and soil maps. J. Paleolimnol. 1999, 22(3):253-257.
4. Brevik E.C., Calzolari C., Miller B.A., Pereira P., Kabala C., Baumgarten A., Jordán A. Soil mapping, classification, and modeling: history and future directions. Geoderma 2015, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.017.
5. Buol S.W. Saprolite-Regolith taxonomy: an approximation. Whole Regolith Pedology: Soil Science Society of America Special Publication Number 34, Madison 1994, 119-132. D.L. Cremeens, R.B. Brown, J.H. Huddleston (Eds.).
6. Buol S.W., Southard R.J., Graham R.C., McDaniel P.A. Soil Genesis and Classification 2011, John Wiley & Sons. 6th edition.
7. Cumbie D.H., McKay L.D. Influence of diameter on particle transport in a fractured shale saprolite. J. Contam. Hydrol. 1999, 37:139-157.
8. FAO Guidelines for Soil Description 2006, 97. FAO, Rome. fourth ed.
9. FAO/ISRIC/ISSS World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Reports 84 1998, Rome, FAO.
10. Graham R.C., Guertal W.R., Tice K.R. The pedologic nature of weathered rock. Whole Regolith Pedology: Soil Science Society of America Special Publication Number 34, Madison 1994, 21-40. D.L. Cremeens, R.B. Brown, J.H. Huddleston (Eds.).
11. Gray J., Murphy B. Parent material and soils: a guide to the influence of parent material on soil distribution in eastern Australia. NSW Dep't of Land and Water Conservation Technical Report 45, Sydney 1999.
12. Gray J., Murphy B. Parent material and world soil distribution. Paper presented at the 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Bangkok, Thailand 2002.
13. Hartemink A.E., Minasny B. Towards digital soil morphometrics. Geoderma 2014, 230-231:305-317.
14. IUSS Working Group WRB World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports 103 2007, FAO, Rome.
15. IUSS Working Group WRB World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014: international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports 106 2014, Rome, FAO.
16. Juilleret J., Iffly J.F., Hoffmann L., Hissler C. The potential of soil survey as a tool for surface geological mapping: a case study in a hydrological experimental catchment (Huewelerbach, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg). Geol. Belg. 2012, 15(1-2):36-41.
17. Keary P. The New Penguin Dictionary of Geology 2001, Penguin Books Ltd., London.
18. Langohr R., Cuyckens G. Une forêt aux pieds de 'limon', sol et relief en Fôret de Soignes: des témoins uniques. Réserves Naturelles 1986, 3:51-57.
19. Lin H. Earth's Critical Zone and hydropedology: concepts, characteristics, and advances. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14:25-45.
20. Lozet J., Mathieu C. Dictionnaire encyclopédique de science du sol 2011, Lavoisier, Editions Tech&Doc, Paris, (733 pp.).
21. McKay L.D., Driese S.G., Smith K.H., Vepraskas M.J. Hydrogeology and pedology of Saprolitic formed from sedimentary rock, eastern Tennessee, USA. Geoderma 2005, 126(1-2):27-45.
22. Merrill G.P. A treatise on rocks, rock-weathering and soils 1906, The MacMillan Company, London, ( (accessed 17-08-2015)).
23. Miller B.A., Lee Burras C. Comparison of surficial geology maps based on soil survey and in depth geological survey. Soil Horiz. 2015, 56(1):1-12.
24. Nachtergaele F.O. The soils to be classified in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2004, Paper presented at Soil Classification 2004, Petrozavodsk, Russia.
25. Neuendorf K.K.E., Mehl J.P., Jackson J.A. Glossary of Geology 2005, American Geological Institute, Washington, DC. 5th ed.
26. Ohnuki Y., Shimizu A., Chann S., Toriyama J., Kimhean C., Araki M. Seasonal change in thick regolith hardness and water content in a dry evergreen forest in Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia. Geoderma 2008, 146(1):94-101.
27. Rossiter D.G. Classification of urban and industrial soils in the world reference base for soil resources. J. Soils Sediments 2007, 7(2):96-100.
28. Schaetzl R.J., Thompson M.L. Soils. Genesis and Geomorphology 2015, Cambridge University Press, New York, (795 pp.). 2nd edition.
29. Scott K.M., Pain C.F. Regolith Science 2009, CSIRO Press, (472 pp.).
30. Soil Science Glossary Terms Committee (SSGT). 2008. Internet glossary of soil science terms. < (accessed 17.08.2015.). https://www.soils.org/publications/soils-glossary%3e.
31. Soil Survey Division Staff Soil Survey Manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18 1993.
32. Soil Survey Staff Keys to Soil Taxonomy 2014, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. 12th edition.
33. Soil Survey Staff Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys 1999, USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC. 2nd Edition.
34. Stolt H.M., Baker J.C. Strategies for studying saprolite and saprolite genesis. Whole Regolith Pedology: Soil Science Society of America Special Publication Number 34 1994, 1-19. D.L. Cremeens, R.B. Brown, J.H. Huddleston (Eds.).
35. Tandarich J.P., Darmody R.G., Follmer L.R. The pedo-weathering profile: a paradigm for whole-regolith pedology from the glaciated mid-continental United States of America. Whole Regolith Pedology: Soil Science Society of America Special Publication Number 34, Madison 1994, 97-117. D.L. Cremeens, R.B. Brown, J.H. Huddleston (Eds.).
36. Tarnocai C., Broll G., Blume H.P. Classification of permafrost-affected soils in the WRB. "Cryosols: Permafrost-Affected Soils" 2004, 637-656. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. J. Kimble (Ed.).
37. Thomas D.S., Goudie A.S. The Dictionary of Physical Geography 2000, Blackwell Publishing. 3rd edition.
38. Van Huyssteen C.W., Michéli E., Fuchs M., Waltner I. Taxonomic distance between South African diagnostic horizons and the World Reference Base diagnostics. Catena 2014, 113:276-280.
39. Vepraskas M.J. Predicting contaminant transport along quartz veins above the water table in a mica-schist saprolite. Geoderma 2005, 126(1):47-57.
40. Wald J.A., Graham R.C., Schoeneberger P.J. Distribution and properties of soft weathered bedrock at ≤1m depth in the contiguous United States. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2013, 38:614-626.
41. White R.E. Principles and Practice of Soil Science: The Soil as a Natural Resource 2006, John Wiley & Sons. 4rd edition.
42. Wrede S., Fenicia F., Martínez-Carreras N., Juilleret J., Hissler C., Krein A., Savenije H.H.G., Uhlenbrook S., Kavetski D., Pfister L. Towards more systematic perceptual model development: a case study using 3 Luxembourgish catchments. Hydrol. Process. 2014, doi:10.1002/hyp.10393.
43. Wysocki D.A., Schoeneberger P.J., LaGarry H.E. Soil surveys: a window to the subsurface. Geoderma 2005, 126(1):167-180.
44. Zanner C.W., Graham R.C. Deep regolith: exploring the lower reaches of soil. Geoderma 2005, 126(1):1-3.