Radiation exposure in relation to the arterial access site used for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Lancet

Volumn 386, Issue 10009, 2015, Pages 2192-2203

  Plourde, Guillaume ^a   Pancholy, Samir B ^b   Nolan, Jim ^c   Jolly, Sanjit ^d   Rao, Sunil V ^e   Amhed, Imdad ^b   Bangalore, Sripal ^f   Patel, Tejas ^g,h   Dahm, Johannes B ⁱ   Bertrand, Olivier F ^a,j  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g VS Hospital   (India)

^h SMT NHL MUNICIPAL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

ⁱ Heart and Vascular Center Neu Bethlehem   (Germany)

^j MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; EMBASE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OPERATOR; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VASCULAR ACCESS; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; RADIAL ARTERY;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

EID: 84949087786     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00305-0     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. SS Jolly, S Yusuf, J Cairns the RIVAL trial group Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial Lancet 377 2011 1409 1420
2. E Romagnoli, G Biondi-Zoccai, A Sciahbasi et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 2481 2489
3. OF Bertrand, J Rodés-Cabau, E Larose et al. One-year clinical outcome after abciximab bolus-only compared with abciximab bolus and 12-hour infusion in the Randomized EArly Discharge after Transradial Stenting of CoronarY Arteries (EASY) Study Am Heart J 156 2008 135 140
4. OF Bertrand, P Bélisle, D Joyal et al. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis Am Heart J 163 2012 632 648
5. SR Mehta, SS Jolly, J Cairns the RIVAL Investigators Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 2490 2499
6. I Bernat, D Horak, J Stasek et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial J Am Coll Cardiol 63 2014 964 972
7. SV Rao, FS Ou, TY Wang et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1 2008 379 386
8. JL Georges, L Belle, C Ricard et al. Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 83 2014 729 738
9. A Liberati, DG Altman, J Tetzlaff et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration BMJ 339 2009 b2700
10. E Aptecar, JM Pernes, M Chabane-Chaouch et al. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67 2006 711 720
11. G Hahalis, G Tsigkas, I Xanthopoulou the The Transulnar or Transradial Instead of Coronary Transfemoral Angiographies Study (the AURA of ARTEMIS Study) Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial Circ Cardiovasc Interv 6 2013 252 261
12. MS Stecker, S Balter, RB Towbin the SIR Safety and Health Committee the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee Guidelines for patient radiation dose management J Vasc Interv Radiol 20 suppl 2009 S263 S273
13. ICRP PL Khong, H Ringertz et al. ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology Ann ICRP 42 2013 1 63
14. F Larrazet, A Dibie, F Philippe, R Palau, R Klausz, F Laborde Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty Br J Radiol 76 2003 473 477
15. DJ Hildick-Smith, JT Walsh, MD Lowe, LM Shapiro, MC Petch Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: an analysis of 500 cases Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 61 2004 60 66
16. JT Mann 3rd, MG Cubeddu, JE Schneider, M Arrowood Right radial access for PTCA: a prospective study demonstrates reduced complications and hospital charges J Invasive Cardiol 8 suppl D 1996 40D 44D
17. JT Mann 3rd, G Cubeddu, M Arrowood Operator radiation exposure in PTCA: comparison of radial and femoral approaches J Invasive Cardiol 8 suppl D 1996 22D 25D
18. F Kiemeneij, GJ Laarman, D Odekerken, T Slagboom, R van der Wieken A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study J Am Coll Cardiol 29 1997 1269 1275
19. Y Louvard, T Lefevre, A Allain, M Morice Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52 2001 181 187
20. S Saito, S Tanaka, Y Hiroe et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 59 2003 26 33
21. BK Reddy, PS Brewster, T Walsh, MW Burket, WJ Thomas, CJ Cooper Randomized comparison of rapid ambulation using radial, 4 French femoral access, or femoral access with AngioSeal closure Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62 2004 143 149
22. WJ Cantor, G Puley, MK Natarajan et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction - the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial Am Heart J 150 2005 543 549
23. F Yigit, AT Sezgin, T Erol et al. An experience on radial versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in Turkey Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 6 2006 229 234
24. HW Lange, H von Boetticher Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach Catheter CardiovascInterv 67 2006 12 16
25. C Brasselet, S Tassan, P Nazeyrollas, M Hamon, D Metz Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI trial Heart 93 2007 1556 1561
26. S Achenbach, D Ropers, L Kallert et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72 2008 629 635
27. M Brueck, D Bandorski, W Kramer, M Wieczorek, R Höltgen, H Tillmanns A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2 2009 1047 1054
28. E Santas, V Bodí, J Sanchis et al. The left radial approach in daily practice. A randomized study comparing femoral and right and left radial approaches Rev Esp Cardiol 62 2009 482 490
29. P Chodór, H Krupa, T Kurek et al. RADIal versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (RADIAMI): a prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial Cardiol J 16 2009 332 340
30. JM Vázquez Rodríguez Comparación del acceso radial frente al acceso femoral en la revascularización percutánea durante la fase aguda del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST 2009 Universidade da Coruña Coruña, Spain
31. L Hou, YD Wei, WM Li, YW Xu Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction Saudi Med J 31 2010 158 162
32. P Chodór, T Kurek, A Kowalczuk et al. Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial Kardiol Pol 69 2011 763 771
33. YB Wang, XH Fu, XC Wang et al. Randomized comparison of radial versus femoral approach for patients with STEMI undergoing early PCI following intravenous thrombolysis J Invasive Cardiol 24 2012 412 416
34. HW Lange, H von Boetticher Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5 2012 445 449
35. SS Jolly, J Cairns, K Niemela the RIVAL Investigators Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6 2013 258 266
36. TT Michael, M Alomar, A Papayannis et al. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention) JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6 2013 1138 1144
37. L Kołtowski, KJ Filipiak, J Kochman et al. Access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: radial vs. femoral-a prospective, randomised clinical trial (OCEAN RACE) Kardiol Pol 72 2014 604 611
38. JPT Higgins, S Green Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011) 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration
39. TR Koenig, D Wolff, FA Mettler, LK Wagner Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 1, characteristics of radiation injury AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 2001 3 11
40. S Balter Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: operational radiation safety Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 47 1999 347 353
41. TS Lo, K Ratib, AY Chong, G Bhatia, M Gunning, J Nolan Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study Am Heart J 164 2012 455 461
42. O Dössel, WC Schlegel World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering. Sept 7-12, 2009, Munich, Germany. 25/3 radiation protection and dosimetry, biological effects of radiation. IFMBE proceedings 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg
43. ICRP Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60 Ann ICRP 21 1990 1991
44. Public Health England Ionizing radiation: dose comparisons 2011 Health protection - guidance, UK Government
45. C Cousins, DL Miller, G Bernardi the International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP Publication 120: Radiological protection in cardiology Ann ICRP 42 2013 1 125
46. E Kuon Radiation exposure in invasive cardiology Heart 94 2008 667 674
47. TM Bashore Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory Am Heart J 147 2004 375 378
48. R Fazel, TC Gerber, S Balter the American Heart Association Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Council on Clinical Cardiology Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Approaches to enhancing radiation safety in cardiovascular imaging: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Circulation 130 2014 1730 1748
49. H Liu, Z Jin, L Jing Comparison of radiation dose to operator between transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography with optimised radiation protection: a phantom study Radiat Prot Dosimetry 158 2014 412 420
50. AW Wassef, B Hiebert, A Ravandi et al. Radiation dose reduction in the cardiac catheterization laboratory utilizing a novel protocol JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7 2014 550 557
51. E Abdelaal, G Plourde, J MacHaalany the Interventional Cardiologists at Quebec Heart-Lung Institute Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7 2014 567 574
52. KP Kim, DL Miller, S Balter et al. Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures Health Phys 94 2008 211 227
53. AJ Chase, EB Fretz, WP Warburton et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg) Heart 94 2008 1019 1025
54. CJ Cooper, RA El-Shiekh, DJ Cohen et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison Am Heart J 138 1999 430 436
55. O Roussanov, SJ Wilson, K Henley et al. Cost-effectiveness of the radial versus femoral artery approach to diagnostic cardiac catheterization J Invasive Cardiol 19 2007 349 353
56. M Ingwersen, A Drabik, U Kulka et al. Physicians' radiation exposure in the catheterization lab: does the type of procedure matter? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6 2013 1095 1102