Continuation rates and reasons for discontinuation of intra-uterine device in three provinces of Pakistan: Results of a 24-month prospective client follow-up

Health Research Policy and Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Hameed, Waqas ^a   Azmat, Syed Khurram ^a,b   Ishaque, Muhammad ^a   Hussain, Wajahat ^a   Munroe, Erik ^c   Mustafa, Ghulam ^a   Khan, Omar Farooq ^a   Abbas, Ghazunfer ^a   Ali, Safdar ^a   Asghar, Qaiser Jamshaid ^a   Ali, Sajid ^a   Ahmed, Aftab ^a   Hamza, Hasan Bin ^d  

^a Marie Stopes Society   (Pakistan)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c MARIE STOPES INTERNATIONAL   (United Kingdom)

^d Freelance Public Health Consultant   (Australia)

Author keywords

Discontinuation; Family planning; Intra uterine device; Social franchise

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAKISTAN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; RESIDENT; RISK FACTOR; TRADITIONAL BIRTH ATTENDANT; TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH AUXILIARY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; LIFE TABLE; MOTIVATION; PREGNANCY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; UTILIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; LIFE TABLES; MOTIVATION; PAKISTAN; PREGNANCY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84949023981     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14784505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-015-0040-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2012-13. Islamabad and Calverton, MA: National Institute of Population Studies and ICF International; 2013. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR290/FR290.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2015.
2. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2006-7. Islamabad and Calverton, MA: National Institute of Population Studies and Macro International Inc.; 2008. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR200/FR200.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2015.
3. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth JE, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Eng J Med. 2012;366(21):1998-2007.
4. Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(5):1105-13.
5. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World Contraceptive Use 2013. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/worldContraceptivePatternsWallChart2013.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2015.
6. Khan AA, Khan A, Abbaas K, Tirmizi SF. ul Islam Z. The context and limitations of female sterilization services in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(4 Suppl 3):S21-6.
7. Bakamjian L, Curtis C. Meeting national goals and people's needs with LA/PMs. New York: United States Agency for International Development; 2013.
8. Azmat SK, Shaikh BT, Hameed W, Mustafa G, Hussain W, Asghar J, et al. Impact of social franchising on contraceptive use when complemented by vouchers: a quasi-experimental study in rural Pakistan. PLoS One. 2013;8(9), e74260.
9. The National, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) program 2006-2012. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Health; 2006.
10. Azmat S, Shaikh B, Hameed W, Bilgrami M, Mustafa G, Ali M, et al. Rates of IUCD discontinuation and its associated factors among the clients of a social franchising network in Pakistan. BMC Womens Health. 2012;12:8.
11. Ali MM, Sadler RK, Cleland J, Ngo TD, Shah IH. Long-term contraceptive protection, discontinuation and switching behaviour: intrauterine device (IUD) use dynamics in 14 developing countries. London: Marie Stopes International; 2011.
12. Nguyen TH, Park MH, Le MH, Ngo TD. The dynamics of intrauterinedevice (IUD) use among Vietnamese women: a retrospective study. London: Marie Stopes International; 2011.
13. Kristman V, Manno M, Cote P. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(8):751-60.
14. Babbie ER. Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1990.