Learning shape from Defocus*

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2351, Issue , 2002, Pages 735-745

  Favaro, Paolo ^a   Soatto, Stefano ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; CAMERAS; COMPUTER VISION; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; RECOVERY; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

FINITE DIMENSIONAL; INTRINSIC DIMENSIONALITIES; ORTHOGONAL PROJECTORS; RADIANCE DISTRIBUTIONS; SHAPE-FROM-DEFOCUS; SQUARE INTEGRABLE; SYNTHETIC PATTERNS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPE;

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 84948990419     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47967-8_49     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. A. N. Rajagopalan and S. Chaudhuri. A variational approach to recovering depth from defocused images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19, (no.10):1158–64, October 1997.
2. W. Boothby. Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry. Academic Press, 1986.
3. S. Chaudhuri and A. N. Rajagopalan. Depth from defocus: a real aperture imaging approach. Springer Verlag, 1999.
4. J. Ens and P. Lawrence. An investigation of methods for determining depth from focus. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 15:97–108, 1993.
5. P. Favaro and S. Soatto. Shape and reflectance estimation from the information divergence of blurred images. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 755–768, June 2000.
6. G. Golub and V. Pereyra. The differentiation of pseudo-inverses and nonlinear least-squares problems whose variables separate. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 10(2):413–532, 1973.
7. R. A. Jarvis. A perspective on range finding techniques for computer vision. In IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, volume 2, page 122-139, March 1983.
8. H. Jin and P. Favaro. A variational approach to shape from defocus. In Proc. of the European Conference on Computer Vision, volume in presss, May 2002.
9. S. Nayar and Y. Nakagawa. Shape from focus. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 16(8):824–831, 1994.
10. A. Pentland. A new sense for depth of field. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 9:523–531, 1987.
11. S. Soatto and P. Favaro. A geometric approach to blind deconvolution with application to shape from defocus. In Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10–17, June 2000.
12. M. Subbarao and G. Surya. Depth from defocus: a spatial domain approach. Intl. J. of Computer Vision, 13:271–294, 1994.
13. M. Watanabe and S. K. Nayar. Rational filters for passive depth from defocus. Intl. J. of Comp. Vision, 27(3):203–225, 1998.
14. Y. Xiong and S. Shafer. Depth from focusing and defocusing. In Proc. of the Intl. Conf. of Comp. Vision and Pat. Recogn., pages 68–73, 1993.