A comparative utility analysis of case-based reasoning and control-rule learning systems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 912, Issue , 1995, Pages 138-150

  Francis, Anthony G ^a   Ram, Ashwin ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACHINE LEARNING;

CASE BASED REASONING SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; CONTROL RULE LEARNING; DESIGN STRATEGIES; PROBLEM SOLVING SYSTEMS; SYSTEM'S PERFORMANCE; THRESHOLD CONDITION; UTILITY ANALYSIS;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 84948978920     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-59286-5_54     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Barret, A, & Weld, D, (1994). Partial order planning: evaluating possible efficiency gains. Artificial Intelligence, 67 (1), 71-112.
2. Etzioni, O. (1992) An Asymptotic Analysis of Speedup Learning. In Machine Learning: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop, 1992.
3. Francis, A. and Ram, A. (1993). Computational Models of the Utility Problem and their Application to a Utility Analysis of Case-Based Reasoning. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Knowledge Compilation and Speedup Learning, pages 48-55, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, June 30, 1993.
4. Gratch, J.M. and Dejong, G.F. (1991) Trouble with gestalts: The composability problem in control learning. Technical Report, University of Illinois at Urtana-Champaign, April 1991.
5. Hanks, S. & Weld, D.S. (1995). A domain-independent algorithm for plan adaptation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2 (1995), 319-360.
6. Holder, L.B.; Porter, B.W.; Mooney, R.J. (1990). The general utility problem in machine learning. In Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, 1990.
7. Ihrig, L. & Kambhampati, S. (1994). On the Relative Utility of Plan-Space v. State-Space Planning in a Case-Based Framework, Technical Report 94-006, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, 1994. Arizona State University.
8. Kolodner, J.L. & Simpson, R.L. (1988). The Mediator: A case study of a case-based reasoner. Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Information and Computer Science, Technical Report no. GIT-ICS-88/11. Atlanta, Georgia.
9. Kolodner, J.L. (1993). Case-based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
10. Koton, P, A. (1989). A Method for Improving the Efficiency of Model-Based Reasoning Systems. Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Hemisphere Publishing, 1989.
11. Markovitch, S. and Scott, P.D. (1993) Information Filtering: Selection Methods in Learning Systems. Machine Learning, 10: 113-151.
12. Minton, S. (1988). Quantitative results concerning the utility of explanation-based learning. In Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.
13. Minton, S. (1990). Quantitative results concerning the utility of explanation-based learning. Artificial Intelligence, 42(2-3), March 1990.
14. Newell, A. & Simon, H.A. (1975). Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search. Reprinted in Haugeland, J., (ed.). Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, chapter 1, pp 35-66. MIT Press, 1981.
15. Ram, A. & Hunter, L. (1992) The Use of Explicit Goals for Knowledge to Guide Inference and Learning. Applied Intelligence, 2(1): 47-73.
16. Schank, R. & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
17. Simon, H.A. (1993). Artificial Intelligence as an Experimental Science. Invited Talk. Abstracted in Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, page 853, July 11-15, 1993.
18. Tambe, M.; Newell, A.; Rosenbloom, P. S. (1990). The Problem of Expensive Chunks and its Solution by Restricting Expressiveness. Machine Learning, 5: 299-348, 1990.