Structural issues in active rule systems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1186, Issue , 1997, Pages 203-214

  Bailey, James ^a   Dong, Guozhu ^a   Ramamohanarao, Kotagiri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUERY LANGUAGES;

ACTIVE DATABASE; ACTIVE DATABASE SYSTEM; ACTIVE RULES; EXPRESSIVE POWER; META RULES; RULE SYSTEMS; STRUCTURAL ISSUES;

QUERY PROCESSING;

EID: 84948978678     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-62222-5_46     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
2. E. Baralis, S. Ceri, and S. Paraboschi. Improved rule analysis by means of triggering and activation graphs. In T. Sellis, editor, Rules in Database Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 985, pages 165-181. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
3. S. Ceri and J. Widom. Deriving production rules for constraint maintenance. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Very Large Databases, pages 566-577, Brisbane, Australia, 1990.
4. S. Ceri and J. Widom. Deriving production rules for incremental view maintenance. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Very Large Databases, pages 577-589, Barcelona, Spain, 1991.
5. S. Chakravarthy and D. Mishra. Snoop: An expressive event specification language for active databases. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 14(l):1-26, 1994.
6. C. Collet, T. Coupaye, and T. Svensen. Naos: Efficient and modular reactive capabilities in an object oriented database system. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data bases, pages 132-143, Santiago, Chile, 1994.
7. U. Dayal, M. Hsu, and R. Ladin. Organizing long running activities with triggers and transactions. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on the Management of Data, pages 204-214, Atlantic City, 1990.
8. U. Dayal et al. The HiPAC project: Combining active databases and timing constraints. ACM SIGMOD Record, 17(l):51-70, 1988.
9. R. Hull and D. Jacobs. Language constructs for programming active databases. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Very Large Databases, pages 455-468, 1991.
10. H. V. Jagadish, A. O. Mendelzon, and I. S. Mumick. Managing rule conflicts in an active database. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium, on Principles of Database Systems, Montreal, Canada, 1996.
11. P. Picouet and V. Vianu. Semantics and expressiveness issues in active databases. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pages 126-138, San Jose, California, 1995.
12. E. Post. Finite combinatory processes-formulation I. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1:103-105, 1936.
13. E. Simon and C. de Maindreville. Deciding whether a production rule is relational computable. In Proceedings of The International Conference on Database Theory, pages 205-222, 1988.