Introduction of viewpoints in conceptual graph formalism

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1257, Issue , 1997, Pages 168-182

  Ribière, Myriam ^a   Dieng, Rose ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Conceptual graphs; Knowledge representation; Viewpoints

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

CONCEPTUAL GRAPH; OBJECT-ORIENTED REPRESENTATION; VIEWPOINTS;

OBJECT-ORIENTED DATABASES;

EID: 84948964403     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0027869     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. D.G. Bobrow, T. Winograd, An overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language, Cognitive Science, vol.1 n°.1, p. 3-45, 1977.
2. B. Carré, L. Dekker and J-M. Geib. Multiple and Evolutive Representation in the ROME Language. Towards an integrated Corporate Information System. In Proc. TOOLS’ 90, Paris, 26-29 June 1990.
3. L. Dekker and B. Carré. Multiple and Dynamic Representation offrantes with Points of View in FROME. In Proc. RPO’92. La Grande Motte, France, 22-23 June, 1992.
4. H. Delugach, Specifying Multiple-Viewed Software Requirements With Conceptual Graphs, Jour. Systems and Software, vol. 19, p. 207-224, 1992.
5. G. Ellis, Object-Oriented Conceptuals Graphs, In Ellis et al eds, Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory. Proc. of ICCS’95. Springer Verlag. Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Aug. 1995, p. 144-172.
6. J. Esch, Contexts, Canons and Coreferent Types. In Terpfenhart &al eds, Conceptual Structures: Current Practices: Proc. of the ICCS’94. College Park, Maryland, USA, August 1994, Springer Verlag, LNAI n. 835, p. 185-195.
7. O. Marino, F. Rechenmann, P. Uvietta, Multiple perspectives and classification mechanism in Object-oriented Representation, Proc. 9th ECAI, Stockholm, Sweden, p. 425-430, Pitman Publishing, London, August 1990.
8. P. Martin, Exploitation de graphes conceptuels et de documents structurés et hypertextes pour l’acquisition de connaissances et la recherche d’information, PhD Thesis, University of Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, October 1996.
9. M. Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in The psychology of Computer Vision, McGrawHill, New York, P.H. Winston (ed), Chap. 6, p. 156-189, 1975.
10. G.T. Nguyen, D. Rieu, J. Escamilla, An Object Model for Engineering Design, in Proc, of ECOOP’92, Utrecht, The Netherlands, June/July 1992, Springer-Verlag, p. 232-251.
11. M. Ribière, R. Dieng, M. Blay-Fornarino, A-M. Pinna-Dery, Link-based Reasoning on Conceptual Graphs, in Suppl. Proceedings of ICCS’96, Sydney, Australia, August 1996, p 146-160.
12. M. Stefik, D.G. Bobrow, Object-Oriented Programming: Theme and Variations. The A.I. Magazine, vol. 6, n° 4, p 40-62, 1985.
13. J. F. Sowa. Conceptual Structures, Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1984.
14. J. F. Sowa. Relating Diagrams to Logic. In Mineau & al eds, Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge Representation: Proc. of ICCS’93. Springer Verlag, LNAI n. 699. Quebec City, Canada, August 1993, p. 1-35.
15. M. Wermelinger. Conceptual Structures and First-Order Logic. In Ellis et al eds, Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory. Proc. of ICCS’95, Springer Verlag. Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Aug. 1995, p. 323-337.