Research domain criteria (RDoC) and the DSM - Two methodological approaches to mental health diagnosis

JAMA Psychiatry

Volumn 72, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1163-1164

  Kraemer, Helena Chmura ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DSM-5; GENE EXPRESSION; GENERAL MENTAL DISEASE ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MENTAL DISEASE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS; RESEARCH DOMAIN CRITERIA; SHORT SURVEY; STRUCTURED CLINICAL INTERVIEW FOR DSM DISORDERS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PROCEDURES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS;

EID: 84948961566     PISSN: 2168622X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2134     Document Type: Short Survey

References (7)

1. Kraemer HC, Noda A, O'Hara R. Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: methodological challenges. J Psychiatr Res. 2004; 38 (1): 17-25.
2. Kraemer HC. Measurement of reliability for categorical data in medical research. Stat Methods Med Res. 1992; 1 (2): 183-199.
3. Kraemer HC, Blasey C. How Many Subjects? Statistical Power Analysis in Research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2015.
4. Kraemer HC. The methodological and statistical evaluation of medical tests: the dexamethasone suppression test in psychiatry. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1987; 12 (6): 411-427.
5. Kraemer HC, Kupfer DJ, Clarke DE, Narrow WE, Regier DA. DSM-5: how reliable is reliable enough? Am J Psychiatry. 2012; 169 (1): 13-15.
6. Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005; 2 (8): e124.
7. Holden C. Behavioral science: NIMH takes a new tack, upsetting behavioral researchers. Science. 2004; 306 (5696): 602.