“Editing” Genes: A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 3-10

  O'Keefe, Meaghan ^a   Perrault, Sarah ^a   Halpern, Jodi ^b   Ikemoto, Lisa ^a   Yarborough, Mark ^c   UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences, U C N B C L H S ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

CRISPR; genomic; germline modification; metaphor; public engagement; rhetoric

Indexed keywords

DNA MODIFICATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LITERATURE; BIOETHICS; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; COMPREHENSION; ETHICS; GENETICS; GERMLINE MUTATION; HUMAN GENOME; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LINGUISTICS; NOMENCLATURE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SEMANTICS; UNCERTAINTY; UNITED STATES;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEATS; COMPREHENSION; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENOME, HUMAN; GERM-LINE MUTATION; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; METAPHOR; NEWSPAPERS AS TOPIC; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; UNCERTAINTY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84948960219     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1103804     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. D.Andriessen,, and C.Gubbins. 2009. Metaphor analysis as an approach for exploring theoretical concepts: The case of social capital. Organization Studies 30(8): 845–63.
2. Augustine of Hippo. 1958. On Christian doctrine, trans. D.W.Robertson. New York, NY: Liberal Arts Press.
3. K.Baake, 2003. Metaphor and knowledge: The challenges of writing science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
4. Baltimore, D., and P. Berg. 2015. Let's hit ‘pause’ before altering humankind. Wall Street Journal. April 8. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/lets-hit-pause-before-altering-humankind-1428536400 (accessed August 7, 2015)
5. Baltimore, B. D., P. Berg, M. Botchan, et al. 2015. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science 348(6230): 36–38.
6. E.Biba, 2015. Meet the co-founder of an apocalypse think tank. Scientific American. Available at: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/meet-the-co-founder-of-an-apocalypse-think-tank (accessed August5, 2015).
7. J.J.Bono, 2001. Why metaphor? Toward a metaphorics of scientific practice. In Science studies: Probing the dynamics of scientific knowledge, ed. S.Maasen and M.Winterhager, 215–34. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
8. Brown, E. 2015. DNA editing takes a serious step forward. Los Angeles Times. May 3. Available at: http://www.latimes.com/science/la-sci-gene-editing-embryo-20150503-story.html (accessed July 13, 2015).
9. T.Caulfield, 2004. Biotechnology and the popular press: Hype and the selling of science. Trends Biotechnol 22(7): 337–39. Epub 2004/07/13. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.014 S0167779904001404 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 15245905.
10. L.Ceccarelli, 2004. Neither confusing cacophony nor culinary complements: A case study of mixed metaphors for genomic science. Written Communication 21(1): 92–105.
11. C.M.Condit, 1999. The meanings of the gene: Public debates about human heredity. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
12. V.T.Covello,, R. G. Peters, J. G. Wojtecki, et al. 2001. Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: Responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting. Journal of Urban Health 78(2): 382–91.
13. B.Dancygier,, and E.Sweetser. 2014. Figurative language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
14. J.C.Davenport,, A.K.Frankel, C.M.Parry, and California Coastal Commission. 2003. Waves, wetlands, and watersheds: California Coastal Commission science activity guide. San Francisco, CA: California Coastal Commission.
15. T.Detwiler, 2015. Life after death. Popular Science. Available at: http://www.popsci.com/de-extinction-long-live-mammoth?image=1.
16. G.Fauconnier,, and M.Turner. 2008. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
17. S.Fecht, 2015. Woolly mammoth DNA successfully spliced into elephant cells. Popular Science. Available at: http://www.popsci.com/woolly-mammoth-dna-brought-life-elephant-cells (accessed August5, 2015).
18. M.Fessenden, 2015. Gene editing in human embryos ignites controversy. Smithsonian. Available at: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/first-gene-editing-human-embryos-ignites-controversy-180955087/?no-ist (accessed August5, 2015).
19. Gannett, Inc. 2015. Our brands. Available at: http://www.gannett.com/brands (accessed August27, 2015).
20. R.W.Gibbs,, Jr. 2005. Embodiment and cognitive science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21. C.Gorman,, and D.F.Maron. 2014. The RNA revolution. Scientific American 310(4):52–59.
22. V.Greenwood,, and V.Ross. 2013. The brilliant ten. Popular Science 283(4) 42.
23. A.Griffin, 2015. Fears arise as Chinese modify human embryo genes. USA Today. April 23. Available at: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/04/23/scientists-human-embryo/26227341/ (accessed July 10, 2015).
24. B.Hofmann,, J.H.Solbakk, and S.Holm. 2006. Analogical reasoning in handling emerging technologies: The case of umbilical cord blood biobanking. The American Journal of Bioethics 6.6:49–57.
25. N.Holt, 2014. How DNA scissors can perform surgery directly on your genes. Popular Science. Available at http://www.popsci.com/article/science/how-dna-scissors-can-perform-surgery-directly-your-genes (accessed August5, 2015).
26. V.Hughes, 2013. Return of the Neanderthals. National Geographic News. Available at: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/03/130306-neanderthal-genome-extinction-cloning-hominid-science (accessed August5, 2015).
27. J.Interlandi, 2015. The church of George Church. Popular Science. Available at: http://www.popsci.com/church-george-church (accessed August5, 2015).
28. M.Kim, 2015. Now that we can edit our genome, where do we go? Washington Post May 18, E01.
29. G.Lakoff, 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and thought, ed. A.Ortony, 202–51. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. G.Lakoff,, and M.Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. K.Langin, 2014. Genetic engineering to the rescue against invasive species? National Geographic News. Available at: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/07/140717-gene-drives-invasive-species-insects-disease-science-environment (accessed August5, 2015).
32. E.Lively,, and M.Conroy. 2013. 11 News media frame novel technologies in a familiar way. The Social Life of Nanotechnology 18:223.
33. J.J.López, 2006. Mapping metaphors and analogies. American Journal of Bioethics 6(6): 61–63.
34. K.Lydersen, 2014. A giant step for gene surgery. Discover. Available at: http://discovermagazine.com/2015/jan-feb/38-a-giant-step-for-gene-surgery (accessed August5, 2015).
35. R.Mauricio, 2005. Can ecology help genomics: The genome as ecosystem? Genetica 123:205–9.
36. P.Miller, 2014. George Church: The future without limit. National Geographic News. Available at: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/innovators/2014/06/140602-george-church-innovation-biology-science-genetics-de-extinction (accessed August5, 2015).
37. B.Nerlich,, and C.Halliday. 2007. Avian flu: The creation of expectations in the interplay between science and the media. Sociology of Health & Illness 29(1): 46–65.
38. H.G.Petrie,, and R.S.Oshlag. 1993. Metaphor and learning. In Metaphor and thought, ed. A.Ortony, 579–609. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. A.Pollack, 2014. A powerful new way to edit DNA. New York times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/04/health/a-powerful-new-way-to-edit-dna.html (accessed August5, 2015).
40. M.S.Schäfer, 2012. Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media's coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science 21(6): 650–63.
41. R.Schmitt, 2005. Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 10(2): 358–94.
42. Scientific American Board of Editors. 2015. Altering embryo genes, safely, should not be off-limits. Scientific American. Available at: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/altering-embryo-genes-safely-should-not-be-off-limits (accessed August5, 2015).
43. B.Shapiro, 2015. Long live the mammoth. Popular Science. Available at: http://www.popsci.com/de-extinction-long-live-mammoth (accessed August5, 2015).
44. D.Sidtis, 2014. Formulaic language in an emergentist framework. In The handbook of language emergence, ed. B.MacWhinney and W.O'Grady, 578–99. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
45. J.Tetro, 2015. An arms race of microbial proportions. Popular Science. Available at: http://www.popsci.com/arms-race-microbial-proportions (accessed August5, 2015).
46. Tribune Publishing. 2015. Our portfolio. Available at: http://www.tribpub.com/portfolio (accessed August28, 2015).
47. J.Turney, 1995. The public understanding of genetics—Where next? Human Reproduction & Genetic Ethics 1(2): 5–20.
48. J.Turney, 2007. The latest boom in popular science books. In Journalism, science and society: Science communication between news and public relations, ed. M.W.Bauer, and M.Bucchi, 81–91. New York, NY: Routledge.
49. P.Wallis,, and B.Nerlich. 2005. Disease metaphors in new epidemics: The UK media framing of the 2003 SARS epidemic. Social Science & Medicine 60(11): 2629–39.
50. D.A.Weaver,, and B.Bimber. 2008 Finding news stories: a comparison of searches using LexisNexis and Google News. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 85(3): 515–30.