Associations and roles in object-oriented modeling

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1331, Issue , 1997, Pages 257-270

  Chu, Wesley W ^a   Zhang, Guogen ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

CLASS HIERARCHIES; ER-MODELS; MODELING CONSTRUCT; OBJECT ORIENTED MODEL; ROLE CLASS;

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS;

EID: 84948953397     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63699-4_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Albano, A., Ghelli, G., and Orsini, R., A relationship mechanism for strongly typed object-oriented database programming language, in Proceedings of the 17th VLDB conference, Barcelona, Sept. 1991, pp. 565-575.
2. Albano, A. et al. An object data model with roles, Proc. 19th VLDB Conf., Dublin, Ireland, 1993, pp. 39-51.
3. Bobrew, D. G., and Kahn, K. et al. Common Loops: Merging lisp and objectoriented programming, In Proceedings of ACM OOPSLA '86, pp. 17-29.
4. Booch, G., Object-oriented analysis and design with applications, Benjamn/Cummings, Redwood City, CA, 1994.
5. Bratsberg, S. E., FOOD: Supporting explicit relations in a fully objectoriented database, in Object-oriented databases: Analysis, design & construction (DS-4), Proceedings of the IFIP TC2/WG 2. 6 Working Conference, Windermere, UK, July 1990, pp. 123-140.
6. Bronts, G. H. W. M. et al., A unifying object role modelling theory, Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1995, pp. 213-235.
7. Cattell, R. G. G. (Ed.), The object database standard: ODMG-93 Release 1. 2, Morgan Kauffmann Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, California, 1996.
8. Chambers, C., Object-oriented multi-methods in Cecil, in Proceedings of ECOOP '92, LNCS 615, pp. 33-56.
9. Chen, P. P., The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data, ACM TODS Vol. 1, No. 1, March, 1976, pp. 9-36.
10. Chu, W. W., Yang, H, Chiang, K., Minock, M. Chow, G., Larson, C., CoBase: A Scalable and Extensible Cooperative Information System, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 1996.
11. CoBase Internal Document, CoSQL Specification Report, CoBase Research Lab., Computer Science Department, UCLA, 1996.
12. Diaz, O. and Gray, P. M. D., Semantic-rich user-defined relationship as a main constructor in object-oriented databases, in Object-oriented databases: Analysis, design & construction (DS-4), Proceedings of the IFIP TC2/WG 2. 6 Working Conference, Windermere, UK, July 1990, pp. 207-224.
13. Dittrich, K. R., Object-oriented database systems: the next miles of the marathon, Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 161-167, 1990.
14. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R. and Vlissides, J., Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995, pp. 331-344.
15. Gottlob, G., Schrefl, M. and RSck, B., Extending object-oriented systems with roles, ACM TOIS, Vol. 14, No. 3, July 1996, pp. 268-296.
16. Hull, R. and King, R., Semantic database modeling: survey, applications, and research issues, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 19, No. 3, Sept. 1987, pp. 201-260.
17. Ingalls, D. H. H., A simple technique for handling multiple polymorphism, in OOPSLA '86 Proceedings, Sept. 1986, pp. 347-349.
18. Mugridge, W. B., Hammer, J. and Hosking, J. G., Multi-Methods in a statically-typed programming language, in Proceedings of ECOOP '91, pp. 307-324.
19. Nassif, R., Qiu, Y., and Zhu, J., Extending the object-oriented paradigm to support relationships and constraints, in Object-oriented databases: Analysis, design & construction (DS-4), Proceedings of the IFIP TC2/WG 2. 6 Working Conference, Windermere, UK, July 1990, pp. 305-330.
20. Pernici, B., Objects with Roles, Proe. ACM Conf. on Office Information Systems, 1990, pp. 205-215.
21. Peckham, J. and Maryanski, F., Semantic data models, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 20, No. 3, Sept. 1988, pp. 153-189.
22. Rational Software Corporation, UML semantics vl. 0, Jan. 1997.
23. Richardson, J. and Schwarz, P., Aspects: Extending objects to support multiple, independent roles, Proc. ACM SIGMOD '91 Conf., May 1991, pp. 198-307.
24. Rumbangh, J., Relations as semantic constructs in an object-oriented language, in OOPSLA '87 Proceedings, Oct. 1987, pp. 466-481.
25. Rumbaugh, J. et al., Object-oriented modeling and design, Prentice-hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy, 1991.
26. Snoeck, M. and Dedene, G., Generalization/specialization and role in object oriented conceptual modeling, Data & Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 19, 1996, pp. 171-195.
27. Taivalsaari, A., On the Notion of Inheritance. ACM Computing Surveys, Sept. 1996, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 438-479.
28. Tanzer, C., Remarks on object-oriented modeling of associations, JOOP, Vol. 7, No. 9, Feb. 1995, pp. 43-46.
29. Teorey, T. J., Yang, D. and Fry J. P., A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 18, No. 2, June 1986, pp. 197-222.
30. Wong, R. K., Chau, H. L., and Lochovsky, F. H., A data model and semantics of objects withdynamic roles. In 13th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, April, 1997.