A comparative study on twitter sentiment analysis: Which features are good?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9103, Issue , 2015, Pages 453-457

  Koto, Fajri ^a   Adriani, Mirna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Polarity; Sentiment Analysis; Subjectivity; Twitter

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; DATA MINING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; POLARITY; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SUBJECTIVITY; TWITTER;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84948845333     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19581-0_46     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bravo-Marquez, F., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Combining strengths, emotions and polarities for boosting Twitter sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining, vol. 2 (2013)
2. Raaijmakers, S., Kraaij, W.: A shallow approach to subjectivity classification. In: ICWSM (2008)
3. Aisopos, F., Papadakis, G., Tserpes, K., Varvarigou, T.: Content vs. context for sentiment analysis: a comparative analysis over microblogs. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 187–196 (2012)
4. Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, L.: Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. In: CS224N Project Report, Stanford (2009)
5. Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., Passonneau, R.: Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media, pp. 30–38 (2011)
6. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phraselevel sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 347–354 (2005)
7. Liu, B., Hu, M., Cheng, J.: Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 342–351 (2005)
8. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SentiWordNet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC, vol. 10, pp. 2200–2204 (2010)
9. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Affective norms for English words (ANEW): instruction manual and affective ratings. In: Technical report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, pp. 1–45 (1999)
10. Nielsen, F.A.: A new ANEW: evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. in: arXiv preprint arXiv: 1103.2903 (2011)
11. Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Crowdsourcing a wordemotion association lexicon. Comput. Intell. 29(3), 436–465 (2013)
12. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment strength detection for the social web. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63(1), 163–173 (2012)
13. Ekman, P.: An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 6(3–4), 169–200 (1992)
14. Plutchik, R.: The Psychology and Biology of Emotion. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York (1994)
15. Speriosu, M., Sudan, N., Upadhyay, S., Baldridge, J.: Twitter polarity classification with label propagation over lexical links and the follower graph. In: Proceedings of the First workshop on Unsupervised Learning in NLP, pp. 53–63 (2011)
16. Bird, S.: NLTK: the natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive Presentation Sessions, pp. 69–72 (2006)