STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies1

Radiology

Volumn 277, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 826-832

  Bossuyt, Patrick M ^a   Reitsma, Johannes B ^b   Bruns, David E ^c,d   Glasziou, Paul P ^e   Irwig, Les ^f   Lijmer, Jeroen G ^g   Moher, David ^h,i   Rennie, Drummond ^j   de Vet, Henrica C W ^k   Kressel, Herbert Y ^l   Rifai, Nader ^m,n   Golub, Robert M ^o,p   Altman, Douglas G ^q   Hooft, Lotty ^b   Korevaar, Daniël A ^a   Cohen, Jérémie F ^r  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^d BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^g ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^h OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^j Peer Review Congress   (United States)

^k VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^l BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^m BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁿ Clinical Chemistry Editorial Office   (United States)

^o NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p JAMA   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^r PARIS DESCARTES UNIVERSITY   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EDITOR; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCIENTIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; METHODOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; HUMANS; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84948809033     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151516     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 2014;383:267-276.
2. Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 2010;303:2058-2064.
3. Ochodo EA, de Haan MC, Reitsma JB, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM, LeeflangMM. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of spin. Radiology 2013;267:581-588.
4. Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009; 302:977-984.
5. Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, Leeflang MM, Hooft L, Smidt N, et al. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Radiology 2015;274:781-789.
6. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-1066.
7. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66:1093-1104.
8. Irwig L, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Gatsonis C, Lijmer J. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ 2002;324:669-671.
9. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Radiology 2003;226:24-28.
10. Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med 2014;19:47-54.
11. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63:834-840.
12. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Linnet K, Moons KG. Beyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic tests. Clin Chem 2012;58:1636-1643.
13. Moons KG, de Groot JA, Linnet K, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM. Quantifying the added value of a diagnostic test or marker. Clin Chem 2012;58:1408-1417.
14. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Trans-parent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 2015;350:g7594.
15. Simel DL, Rennie D, Bossuyt PM. The STARD statement for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: application to the history and physical examination. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:768-774.
16. Noel-Storr AH, McCleery JM, Richard E, Ritchie CW, Flicker L, Cullum SJ, et al. Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia: the STARDdem Initiative. Neurology 2014;83:364-373.
17. Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet 2008;371:1149-1150.
18. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 2010;8:24.
19. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-3191.
20. Collins FS, Tabak LA. Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature 2014;505: 612-613.