Framing health for land-use planning legislation: A qualitative descriptive content analysis

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 148, Issue , 2016, Pages 42-51

  Harris, Patrick ^a   Kent, Jennifer ^b   Sainsbury, Peter ^c   Marie Thow, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c SOUTH WESTERN SYDNEY LOCAL HEALTH DISTRICT   (Australia)

Author keywords

Built environment; Framing; Health; Intersectoral action; Land use planning; Legislation; Policy; Qualitative descriptive analysis

Indexed keywords

ACTION PLAN; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HEALTH IMPACT; LAND USE PLANNING; LEGISLATION; PUBLIC SPACE; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; STAKEHOLDER;

CHECKLIST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; HOUSING; HUMAN; LAND USE; LAW; RANDOM SAMPLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; NEW SOUTH WALES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

AUSTRALIA; NEW SOUTH WALES;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; NEW SOUTH WALES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84948807773     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.029     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Badland H., Whitzman C., Lowe M., Davern M., Aye L., Butterworth I., Giles-Corti B., et al. Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Soc. Sci. Med. 2014, 111(0):64-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003.
2. Baum F. The New Public Health 2008, Oxford University Press, Melbourne. third ed.
3. Bell S. The power of ideas: the ideational shaping of the structural power of business. Int. Stud. Q. 2012, 56(4):661-673. 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x.
4. Breton E., De Leeuw E. Theories of the policy process in health promotion research: a review. Health Promot. Int. 2011, 26(1):82-90. 10.1093/heapro/daq051.
5. Carmichael L., Barton H., Gray S., Lease H. Health-integrated planning at the local level in England: impediments and opportunities. Land Use Policy 2013, 31:259-266.
6. Embrett M.G., Randall G. Social determinants of health and health equity policy research: exploring the use, misuse, and nonuse of policy analysis theory. Soc. Sci. Med. 2014, 108:147-155.
7. Friel S., Akerman M., Hancock T., Kumaresan J., Marmot M., Melin T., Vlahov D. Addressing the social and environmental determinants of urban health equity: evidence for action and a research agenda. J. Urban Health 2011, 88(5):860-874.
8. Giles-Corti B. People or places: what should be the target?. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2006, 9(5):357-366.
9. Giles-Corti B., Sallis J.F., Sugiyama T., Frank L.D., Lowe M., Owen N. Translating active living research into policy and practice: one important pathway to chronic disease prevention. J. Public Health Pol. 2015, 10.1057/jphp.2014.53.
10. Giles-Corti B., Whitzman C. Active living research: partnerships that count. Health & Place 2012, 18(1):118-120.
11. Gurran N. Australian Urban Land Use Planning: Principles, Systems and Practice 2011, Sydney University Press, Sydney. second ed.
12. Harris P., Friel S., Wilson A. 'Including health in systems responsible for urban planning': a realist policy analysis research programme. BMJ Open 2015, 5:e008822. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008822.
13. Harris P., Sainsbury P., Kemp L. The fit between health impact assessment and public policy: practice meets theory. Soc. Sci. Med. 2014, 108(0):46-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.033.
14. Harris P.J., Kemp L.A., Sainsbury P. The essential elements of health impact assessment and healthy public policy: a qualitative study of practitioner perspectives. BMJ Open 2012, 2(6). 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001245.
15. Howlett M., Ramesh M., Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Sub-systems 2009, Oxford University Press, Canada. third ed.
16. Hunter D.J. Role of Politics in Understanding Complex, Messy Health Systems: An Essay by David J Hunter 2015, vol. 350.
17. Jackson R.J., Danneberg A.L., Frumkin H.L. Health and the built environment: 10 Years after. Am. J. Public Health 2013, 103(9):1542-1544.
18. Kent J., Thompson S. Health and the built environment: exploring foundations for a new interdisciplinary profession. J. Environ. Public Health 2012, 2012.
19. Kingdon J.W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies 2011, Pearson Education Inc, Glenview: Ill. third ed.
20. Lane M.B. Public participation in planning: an intellectual history. Aust. Geogr. 2005, 36(3):283-299. 10.1080/00049180500325694.
21. Lopez R.P., Hynes H.P. Obesity, physical activity, and the urban environment: public health research needs. Environ. Health 2006, 5(1):25.
22. Lowe M., Whitzman C., Badland H., Davern M., Aye L., Hes D., Giles-Corti B., et al. Planning healthy, liveable and sustainable cities: how can indicators inform policy?. Urban Policy Res. 2015, 1-14. 10.1080/08111146.2014.1002606.
23. Marsh D. Keeping ideas in their place: in praise of thin constructivism. Aust. J. Polit. Sci. 2009, 44(4):679-696.
24. Mendoza J.A., Salmon J., Sallis J.F. Partnerships for progress in active living: from research to action. Health & Place 2012, 18(1):1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.012.
25. Northridge M.E., Sclar E.D., Biswas M.P. Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: a conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. J. Urban Health 2003, 80(4):556-568.
26. NSW Health Healthy Urban Development Checklist 2009, NSW Government: NSW Department of Health.
27. O'Farrell B. Media Release: Planning White Paper Released: Communities and Consultation at the Heart of Planning 2013, NSW Government, Sydney.
28. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice 2015, Wiley Publications, inc.
29. Sabatier P.A., Weible C. Theories of the Policy Process 2014, Westview Press.
30. Sainsbury P.G. Ethical considerations involved in constructing the built environment to promote health. J. Bioethic. Inq. 2013, 10(1):39-48.
31. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res. Nurs. Health 2000, 23(4):334-340. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.
32. Shankardass K., Solar O., Murphy K., Greaves L., O'Campo P. A scoping review of intersectoral action for health equity involving governments. Int. J. Public Health 2012, 57(1):25-33.
33. Shiffman J., Smith S. Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet 2007, 370(9595):1370-1379.
34. Smith K.E., Katikireddi S.V. A glossary of theories for understanding policymaking. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2013, 67(2):198-202. 10.1136/jech-2012-200990.
35. Snow D.A., Rochford E.B., Worden S.K., Benford R.D. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1986, 51(4):464-481. 10.2307/2095581.
36. Walt G., Shiffman J., Schneider H., Murray S.F., Brugha R., Gilson L. 'Doing' health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy Plan. 2008, 23(5):308-317. 10.1093/heapol/czn024.
37. Werner M.D., Cornelissen J.P. Framing the change: switching and blending frames and their role in instigating institutional change. Organ. Stud. 2014, 35(10):1449-1472. 10.1177/0170840614539314.
38. World Health Organisation Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health 2008, Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Geneva.
39. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2013, Sage publications.