Crash-Proof Syntax

Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 90-105

  Frampton, John ^a   Gutmann, Sam ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Constrained operations; Crash proof syntax1; Filtering; Free generation; Representational theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948778098     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470755662.ch5     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Martin Rogers, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. "Derivation by phase." In Ken Hale, A Life in Language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Collins, Chris. 1997. Local Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Epstein, Samuel David. 2000. Essays in Syntactic Theory. London and New York:Routledge.
5. Epstein, Samuel David and T. Daniel Seely. 1999. "SPEC-ifying the GF 'subject;' eliminating A-Chains and the EPP with a derivational model," MS, University of Michigan and Eastern Michigan University.
6. Frampton, John. 1996. "Expletive insertion," In Chris Wilder, Hans-Martin Gärtner, and Manfred Bierwisch, eds., The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
7. Frampton, John and Sam Gutmann. 1999. "Cyclic computation, a computationally efficient minimalist syntax." Syntax 2.1: 1-27.
8. Frampton, John and Sam Gutmann. 2000. "Agreement is feature sharing." MS, Northeastern University. (Available at www.math.neu.edu/ling)