Narratives of Compound Loss: Parents' Stories from the Organ Retention Scandal

Narrative Research in Health and Illness

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 239-256

  Richardson, Ruth ^a  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Death culture; Loss; Mother; Organ retention; Scandal

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948750079     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470755167.ch15     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Richardson R. Death, Dissection and the Destitute. Routledge UK/Methuen USA, 1988; Penguin Books, 1989; 2nd edn, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000.
2. Richardson R. Hurwitz BS. Donors' attitudes towards body donation for dissection. Lancet 1995;346:2779.
3. Richardson R. Transplanting teeth: reflections on a cartoon by Thomas Rowlandson. Lancet 1999;354:1740.
4. Richardson R. A potted history of specimen-taking. Lancet 2000;355:935-6.
5. Richardson R. Bodysnatchers; Burke and Hare; The corpse; Funeral practices. Sections in: Blakemore C, ed. Oxford Companion to the Body. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
6. Richardson R. From the medical museum: Pennant's serpent. Lancet 2001;357:966.
7. Richardson R. Coroner Wakley: two remarkable eyewitness accounts. Lancet 2001;358:2150-4.
8. Hinton J. Dying. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967.
9. Murray Parkes C. Bereavement. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978.
10. Pincus L. Life and death: coming to terms with death in the family. London: Abacus, 1978.
11. Lovell A. A Bereavement with a diference: A study of late miscarriage, stillbirth and perinatal death, 1983. London; Polytechnic of the South Bank, p 29-34.
12. Redfern M, Keeling JW, Powell E. The Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry Report. London: The Stationery Office, 2001.
13. Department of Health. Human Bodies, Human Choices. London: Department of Health Publications, 2002, p 3.
14. Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry interim report: removal and retention of human material. London: The Stationery Office, 2000, p 18.
15. Richardson R. Death, Dissection and the Destitute. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000, pp 239-64.
16. Wildgoose J. Catalogue essay for A-N Kelly's exhibition. Birthdays. London, 1999.
17. Wildgoose J. An acceptable body of work? Daily Telegraph, Arts & Books section, 9 May 1998, p A7.
18. Burton JL, Wells M. The Alder Hey affair: implications for pathology practice. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:820-6.
19. Bennett JR. The organ retention furore: the need for consent. Clin Med (J R Coll Phys Lond) 2001;1(3):167-71.
20. Department of Health. Human Bodies, Human Choices. London: Department of Health Publications, 2002, pp 5-6.
21. Richardson R. The corpse and popular culture. In: Richardson R. Death, Dissection and the Destitute, 2nd edn. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000.
22. Richardson R. The corpse as an anatomical object. In: Richardson R. Death, Dissection and the Destitute, 2nd edn, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000.
23. Department of Health. Human Bodies, Human Choices. Department of Health Publications, 2002;4:22-35.
24. Royal College of Pathologists. Tissue retention: draft guidelines. London: RCP, 2000, para. 6.4.
25. Hedges SJ, Gaines W. Donor bodies milled into growing profits: little-regulated industry thrives on unsuspecting families. Chicago Tribune, Tribune Investigative Report: The body parts business, 21 May 2000, section 1:1-2.
26. Department of Health. Human Bodies, Human Choices. Department of Health Publications, 2002, p 5.
27. Brazier M. Organ retention and return: problems of consent. J Med Ethics 2003;29:30-3.
28. Dyer C. Doctors' arrogance blamed for retention of children's organs. BMJ 2000;320:1359.
29. Richardson R, Hurwitz BS. Donors' attitudes towards body donation for dissection. Lancet 1995;346:277-9.