Field spectroscopy metadata system based on ISO and OGC standards

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1003-1022

  Jiménez, Marcos ^a   González, Magdalena ^a   Amaro, Alberto ^b   Fernández Renau, Alix ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TÉCNICA AEROESPACIAL   (Spain)

^b Technical Cabinet   (Spain)

Author keywords

Field spectroscopy; ISO 19115; ISO 19156 O M; Metadata; OGC SensorML; Reflectance spectral libraries

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948748344     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22209964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi3031003     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Van der Meer, F.D.; de Jong, S.D. Imaging Spectrometry: Basic Principles and Prospective Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; p. 406.
2. Schaepman, M.E.; Ustin, S.L.; Plaza, A.J.; Painter, T.H.; Verrelst, J.; Liang, S. Earth system science related imaging spectroscopy-An assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 6, 100-110.
3. Kaufmann, H.; Segl, K.; Kuester, T.; Rogass, C.; Foerster, S.; Wulf, H.; Hofer, S.; Sang, B.; Storch, T.; Mueller, A.; et al. The Environmental Mapping and Analysis Program (EnMAP)-Present Status of Preparatory Phase. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IAGARSS'13), Melbourne, Vic, Australia, 21-26 July 2013.
4. Romano, F.; Santini, F.; Simoniello, T.; Ananasso, C.; Corsini, G.; Cuomo, V. The PRISMA Hyperspectral Mission: Science Activities and Opportunities for Agriculture and Land Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS'13), Melbourne, Vic, Australia, 21-26 July 2013.
5. Milton, E.J.; Schaepman, M.E.; Anderson, K.; Kneubühler, M.; Fox, N. Progress in field spectroscopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 92-109.
6. Pfitzner, K.; Bollhöfer, A.; Esparon, A.; Bartolo, B.; Staben, G. Standardized Spectra (400-2500 nm) and Associated Metadata: An Example from Northern Tropical Australia. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA, 25-30 July 2010.
7. Malthus, T.; Hueni, A. An XML-Based Format for the Exchange of Spectro-Radiometric Data. In Proceedings of the EARSeL SIG IS Workshop, Tel Aviv, Israel, 16-19 March 2009.
8. Jung, A.; Götze, C.; Gläßer, C. Overview of experimental setups in spectroscopic laboratory measurements-The spectour project. Photogramm. Fernerkund. Geoinf. 2012, 433-442.
9. Michener, W.K. Metadata. In Ecological Data: Design, Management and Processing; Michener, W.K., Brunt, J.W., Eds.; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2000; pp. 92-116.
10. Extensible Markup Language (XML). Available online: http://www.w3.org/XML/(accessed on 24 April 2014).
11. Hueni, A.; Nieke, J.; Schopfer, J.; Kneubühler, M.; Itten, K.I. The spectral database SPECCHIO for improved long-term usability and datasharing. Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35, 557-565.
12. Hueni, A.; Malthus, T.; Kneubuehler, M.; Schaepman, M. Data exchange between distributed spectral databases. Comput. Geosci. 2011, 37, 861-873.
13. Ecological Markup Language. Available online: https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/#external//emlparser/docs/index.html (accessed on 24 April 2014).
14. Rühl, M.A.; Schäfer, R.; Kramer, G.W. SpectroML-A markup language for molecular spectrometry data. JALA 2001, 6, 76-82.
15. Heterogeneous Missions Accessibility. Available online: http://earth.esa.int/hma/index.html (accessed on 24 April 2014).
16. Rasaiah, B.; Jones, S.; Bellman, C. Building Better Hyperspectral Datasets: The Fundamental Role of Metadata Protocols in Hyperspectral Field Campaigns. In Proceedings of the 2011 Surveying & Spatial Sciences Biennial Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 21-25 November 2011.
17. Mac Arthur, A.; Alonso, L.; Malthus, T.; Moreno, J. Spectroscopy Field Strategies and Their Effect on Measurements of Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Earth Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 2013 Living Planet Symposium, Edinburgh, UK, 9-13 September 2013.
18. Buddenbaum, H.; Stern, O.; Stellmes, M.; Stoffels, J.; Pueschel, P.; Hill, J.; Werner, W. Field imaging spectroscopy of beech seedlings under dryness stress. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 3721-3740.
19. Salisbury, J.W. Spectral Measurements Field Guide; Tech. Rep. ADA362372; Defense Technology Information Centre: Fort Belvoir, VA, USA, 1998.
20. Mac Arthur, A.; MacLellan, C.; Malthus, T.J. The fields of view and directional response functions of two field spectroradiometers. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50, 3892-3907.
21. Goetz, A.F.H. Making Accurate Field Spectral Reflectance Measurements; ASD Inc.: Boulder, CO, USA, 2012.
22. Schaepman-Strub, G.; Schaepman, M.E.; Painter, T.H.; Dangel, S.; Martonchik, J.V. Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing-Definitions and case studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 103, 27-42.
23. Vierling, L.A.; Fersdahl, M.; Chen, X.; Li, Z.; Zimmerman, P. The Short Wave Aerostat-Mounted Imager (SWAMI): A novel platform for acquiring remotely sensed data from a tethered balloon. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 103, 255-264.
24. Kuusk, A.; Kuusk, J.; Lang, M. A dataset for the validation of reflectance models. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 889-892.
25. Burkart, A.; Cogliati, S.; Schickling, A.; Rascher, U. A novel UAV-based ultra-light weight spectrometer for field spectroscopy. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 14, 62-67.
26. Aerosol Robotic Network. Available online: http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/ (accessed on 24 April 2014).
27. Schmidt, K.S.; Skidmore, A.K. Smoothing vegetation spectra with wavelets. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 1167-1184.
28. Pinto, C.T.; Ponzoni, F.J.; Morgado de Castro, R. Spectral uniformity evaluation of reference surfaces for airborne and orbital sensors absolute calibration. Rev. Bras. Geofis. 2012, 30, 263-275.
29. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Geographic Information-Metadata; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
30. Ruby, J.G.; Fischer, R.L. Spectral signatures database for remote sensing applications. Proc. SPIE 2002, 4816, 156-163.
31. Rasaiah, B.; Jones, S.; Bellman, C.; Malthus, T.J. Critical metadata for spectroscopy field campaigns. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 3662-3680.
32. Watson, T.D.; Wiley, D. Structured metadata spaces. J. Internet Cat. 2000, 3, 263-277.
33. Bröring, A.; Echterhoff, J.; Jirka, S.; Simonis, I.; Everding, T.; Stasch, C.; Liang, S.; Lemmens, R. New generation sensor web enablement. Sensors 2011, 11, 2652-2699.
34. Botts, M. OGC Implementation Specification 07-000 OpenGIS Sensor Model Language (SensorML); Open Geospatial Consortium: Wayland, MA, USA, 2007.
35. Cox, S. OGC Implementation Specification 07-022r1: Observations and Measurements-Part 1: Observation Schema; Open Geospatial Consortium: Wayland, MA, USA, 2007.
36. W3C XML Schema. Available online: http://www.w3.org/standards/xml/schema (accessed on 24 April 2014).
37. ISO Schematron (ISO/IEC 19757-3:2006). Available online: http://www.schematron.com/(accessed on 24 April 2014).
38. ISO TC 211 Schemas. Available online: http://www.isotc211.org/schemas/2005/gco/ (accessed on 24 April 2014).
39. OGC Schemas. Available online: http://schemas.opengis.net/ (accessed on 24 April 2014).
40. Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET). Available online: http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/ontology/ (accessed on 24 April 2014).
41. INTA Field Radiometry Wikipedia. Available online: http://teledeteccion.cec.inta.es/wiki (accessed on 24 April 2014).
42. CEOS: The Earth Observation Handbook. Available online: http://www.eohandbook.com/(accessed on 24 April 2014).
43. Metadata Spanish Core (Núcleo Español de Metadatos, NEM). Available online: http://www.idee.es/resources/documentos/NEMv1.2.pdf (accessed on 24 April 2014).
44. OGC SensorML 2.0. Available online: http://www.opengeospatial.org/node/1971 (accessed on 24 April 2014).
45. Nidamanuri, R.R.; Zbell, B. Use of field reflectance data for crop mapping using airborne hyperspectral image. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2011, 66, 683-691.