Flipping an Algebra Classroom: Analyzing, Modeling, and Solving Systems of Linear Equations

Computers in the Schools

Volumn 32, Issue 3-4, 2015, Pages 201-223

  Kirvan, Rebecca ^a   Rakes, Christopher R ^b   Zamora, Regie ^c  

^a Anne Arundel County Public Schools   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^c Anne Arundel County Public Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

algebra; conceptual procedural understanding; flipped classroom; technology

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRA; LINEAR EQUATIONS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING; CONCEPTUAL/PROCEDURAL UNDERSTANDING; FLIPPED CLASSROOM; HOME VIDEOS; LEARNING GAIN; MULTI VARIATE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS OF LINEAR EQUATIONS; TREATMENT GROUP;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84948698472     PISSN: 07380569     EISSN: 15287033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07380569.2015.1093902     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. P.M.Bentler, (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
2. P.M.Bentler,, & D.G.Bonnett, (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419–456.
3. J.Bergmann,, & A.Sams, (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. WashingtonDC: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
4. K.A.Bollen, (1986). Sample size and Bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375–377.
5. J.Brophy, (1999). Teaching (Educational Practices Series—1). Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/publications/educationalpracticesseriespdf/prac01e.pdf
6. M.G.Bulmer, (1979). Principles of statistics. Mineola, NY: Dover.
7. B.M.Byrne, (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
8. J.Confrey,, K.H.Nguyen,, K.Lee,, N.Panorkou,, A.K.Corley,, & A.P.Maloney, (2012). Turn-on common core math: Learning trajectories for the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.turnonccmath.net/
9. J.Confrey,, K.H.Nguyen,, & A.P.Maloney, (2011). Hexagon map of learning trajectories for the K–8 Common Core Mathematics Standards. Retrieved from http://www.turnonccmath.net/p = map
10. Council of State School Officers (CSSO). (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics: Understanding mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governor's Association. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math
11. D.Cramer, (1997). Basic statistics for social research: Step-by-step calculations and computer techniques using Minitab. New York, NY: Routledge.
12. Edmodo. (2014). Welcome to Edmodo. Retrieved from https://www.edmodo.com
13. B.Fasse,, & J.Kolodner, (2000). Evaluating classroom practices using qualitative research methods: Defining and refining the process. In B.Fishman & S.O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 193–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. A.Gelman,, J.B.Carlin,, H.S.Stern,, D.B.Rubin, (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
15. D.W.Gerbing,, & J.C.Anderson, (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices. In K.A.Bollen & J.S.Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. G.V.Glass,, & L.D.Hopkins, (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17. B.Goodwin,, & K.Miller, (2013). Research says evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Technology-Rich Learning, 70, 78–80.
18. J.Hiebert,, & D.A.Grouws, (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F.K.Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
19. J.Hiebert,, J.W.Stigler,, J.K.Jacobs,, K.B.Givvin,, H.Garnier,, M.Smith,, & R.Gallimore, (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 111–132. doi: 10.3102/01623737027002111
20. L.-T.Hu,, & P.M.Bentler, (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R.Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. L.W.Johnson,, & J.D.Renner, (2012). Effect of the flipped classroom model on a secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions, and student achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. Retrieved from http://theflippedclassroom.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/johnson-renner-2012.pdf
22. Y.Kidron,, & J.Lindsay, (2015). Stated briefly: What does the research say about increased learning time and student outcomes? (REL 2015-061). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia.
23. C.Kieran, (1989). The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. In S.Wagner & C.Kieran (Eds.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 33–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. C.Kieran, (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D.A.Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
25. C.Kieran, (2007). Learning and teaching of algebra at the middle school through college levels: Building meaning for symbols and their manipulation. In F.K.Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 707–762). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
26. J.Kilpatrick,, J.Swafford,, & B.Findell, (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. WashingtonDC: National Academy Press.
27. R.Kwan, (2000). Tapping into children's curiosity. In J.H.Minstrell & E.H.van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 148–150). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
28. M.J.Lage,, G.J.Platt,, & M.Treglia, (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30–43.
29. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B.2001Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. R.J.A.Little, (1987). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
31. H.W.Marsh,, K.-T.Hau,, & D.Grayson, (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In A.Maydeu-Olivares & J.J.McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics (pp. 275–341). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. C.R.Rakes,, J.Valentine,, M.C.McGatha,, & R.N.Ronau, (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 372–400.
33. R.N.Ronau,, C.R.Rakes,, M.L.Niess,, S.B.Bush,, S.Driskell,, & D.Pugalee, (2015). The quality of mathematics education technology literature. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 11, 12–36.
34. D.B.Rubin, (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
35. J.M.Saunders, (2014). The flipped classroom: Its effect on student academic achievement and critical thinking skills in high school mathematics (UMI 3645482). Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 76(03), 128.
36. W.R.Shadish,, T.D.Cook,, & D.T.Campbell, (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
37. R.R.Skemp, (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26. Reprinted in Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12, 88–95. (Original work published 1976)
38. R.E.Slavin,, & N.L.Karweit, (1982). Student teams and mastery learning: A factorial experiment in urban math nine classes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
39. J.P.Stevens, (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
40. J.W.Stigler,, & J.Hiebert, (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instructions: An overview of the TIMSS video study. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 14–21. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article = 1000&context = research_conference_1997#page = 60
41. J.Strayer, (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num = osu1189523914
42. B.Tucker, (2012). The flipped classroom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Education Next, 12, 82–83. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/the-flipped-classroom/
43. C.Vogel, (2008). Algebra: Changing the equation. District Administration, 44, 34–40.
44. What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and standards handbook. Version 3.0. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid = 19