Stem cell stories 1998–2008

Science as Culture

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-11

  Geesink, Ingrid ^a   Prainsack, Barbara ^b   Franklin, Sarah ^c  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948692164     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09505430801915448     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Birch, K., 2006. Introduction:biofutures/biopresents, Special Issue. Science as Culture, 15 (3):173–181.
2. Braude, P., Minger, S., and Warwick, R., 2005. Stem cell therapy:hope or hype? (Editorial). British Medical Journal, 330 21 May:1159–1160.
3. Brown, N., 2003. Hope against hype:accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies, 16 (2):3–21.
4. Brown, N., and Michael, M., 2003. A sociology of expectations:retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15 (1):3–18.
5. Brown, N., Rappert, B., and Webster, A., 2000. Contested Futures:A Sociology of Prospective Technoscience, Edited by:Brown, N., Rappert, B., and Webster, A., Aldershot:Ashgate.
6. Committee on the Biological and Biomedical Applications of Stem Cell Research, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, Institute of Medicine. 2002. Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine, Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
7. Condic, M. L., 2007. What we know about embryonic stem cells. First Things:A Journal of Religion, Culture and Public Life, January Available at:http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article = 5420
8. Editorial. 2007. Don't be fooled by stem cell hype. New Scientist, 24 November:3
9. Evans, M. J., and Kaufman, M. H., 1981. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature, 292 (5819):154–156.
10. Franklin, S., 1997. “ Embodied Progress:a cultural account of assisted conception ”. London and New York:Routledge.
11. Franklin, S., 2001. Culturing biology:cell lines for the second millennium. Health, 5 (3):335–354.
12. Franklin, S., and Lock, M., 2003. “ Animation and cessation:the remaking of life and death ”. In Remaking Life and Death:Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences, Edited by:Franklin, S., and Lock, M., 3–22. Santa Fe, NM:School of American Research Press.
13. Franklin, S., and McNeil, M., 1993. Procreation stories (Editorial Introduction). Science as Culture, 3 (4):477–482.
14. Good, M., Good, B., Schaffer, C., and Lind, S. E., 1990. American oncology and the discourse on hope. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 14:59–79.
15. Holland, S., Lebacqz, K., and Zoloth, L., 2001. The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate:Science, Ethics, and Public Policy, Edited by:Holland, S., Lebacqz, K., and Zoloth, L., Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
16. Kass, L. R., 2005. A way forward on stem cells. Washington Post, 12 July:21 Available at:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/11/AR2005071101415.html
17. Keller, E. F., 1995. Reconfiguring Life:Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology, New York:Columbia University Press.
18. Marshall, E., 1998. A versatile cell line raises scientific hopes, Legal Questions. Science, 282 (5391) 6 November:1014–1015. Available at:http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/282/5391/1014?ck = nck
19. Martin, G. R., 1981. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 78 (12) December:7634–7638.
20. Miller, L. J., and Bloom, F. E., 1998. Editorial:publishing controversial research. Science, 282 (5391) 6 November:1045 Available at:http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/282/5391/1045
21. Moreira, T., and Palladino, P., 2005. Between truth and hope:on Parkinson's disease, neurotransplantation and the production of the ‘self’. History of the Human Sciences, 18:55–82.
22. National Bioethics Advisory Commission NBAC. 1999. Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research, vol. 1. Report and Recommendations Rockville, MD Available at:www.bioethics.gov/reports/past_commissions/nbac_stemcell1.pdf
23. National Bioethics Advisory Commission NBAC. January 2000. Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research, vol. 2. Commissioned Papers January, Rockville, MD Available at:www.bioethics.gov/reports/past_commissions/nbac_stemcell2.pdf
24. Nielsen, T. H., 2005. Five framings—one entity? The political ethics of human embryonic stem cells. Science Studies, 18 (1):30–51.
25. Pontifical Academy for Life. 25 August 2000. Declaration on the Production and the Scientific and Therapeutic Use of Human Embryonic Stem Cells 25 August, Vatican City Available at:http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdlife/documents/rc_pa_acdlife_doc_20000824_cellule-staminali_en.html
26. Regenerative Medicine. 2007. Aims & Scope of Journal, Available online at:http://www.futuremedicine.com/page/journal/rme/aims.jsp
27. Salter, B., 2007. State strategies and speculative innovation in regenerative medicine:the global politics of uncertain futures. Working Paper 20, July Available at:http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/03/03/65/wp20.pdf
28. Shamblott, M. J., Axelman, J., Wang, S., Bugg, E. M., Littlefield, J. W., Donovan, P. J., Blumenthal, P. D., Huggins, G. R., and Gearhart, J. D., 1998. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95 (23) 10 November:13726–13731.
29. Smith, A., 2006. A glossary for stem-cell biology. Nature, 441 (7097):1060
30. Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K., and Yamanaka, S., 2007. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131 30 November:861–872.
31. Thompson, C., 2005. Making Parents:The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technology, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
32. Thomson, J. A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S. S., Waknitz, M. A., Swiergiel, J. J., Marshall, V. S., and Jones, J. M., 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science, 282 (5391) 6 November:1145–1147. Available at:http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/282/5391/1145?ck = nck
33. Thomson, J. A., Kalishman, J., Golos, T. G., Durning, M., Harris, C. P., Becker, R. A., and Hearn, J. P., 1995. Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 92 (17) 15 August:7844–7848.
34. Vogel, G., 1999. Breakthrough of the year:capturing the promise of youth. Science, 286 (5448) 17 December:2238–2239.
35. Vogel, G., and Holden, C., 2007. Developmental biology:field leaps forward with new stem cell advances. Science, 318 (5854) 23 November:1224–1225.
36. Wade, N., 2006. Some scientists see shift in stem cell hopes. The New York Times, 14 August Available at:http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/14/washington/14stem.html?fta = y
37. White House Office of the Press Secretary. 9 August 2001. President Discusses Stem Cell Research, 9 August, Crawford, Texas:The Bush Ranch. Available at:http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/20010809-2.html
38. Yu, J., Vodyanik, M., Smuga-Otto, K., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Frane, J., Tian, S., Nie, J., Jonsdottir, G., Ruotti, V., Stewart, R., Slukvin, I., and Thomson, J., 2007. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, published online 20 November (in Science Express Reports). Available at:http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1151526v1
39. Zipori, D., 2004. The nature of stem cells:state rather than entity. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5 November:873–878.