δ scores are exportable across cultural and linguistic boundaries

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 561-570

  Royall, Donald R ^a,b,c   Palmer, Raymond F ^b   Matsuoka, Teruyuki ^d   Kato, Yuka ^d   Taniguchi, Shogo ^e   Ogawa, Mayu ^d   Fujimoto, Hiroshi ^d   Okamura, Aiko ^f   Shibata, Keisuke ^g   Nakamura, Kaeko ^d   Nakaaki, Shutaro ^h   Koumi, Hiroyuki ⁱ   Mimura, Masaru ^h   Fukui, Kenji ^d   Narumoto, Jin ^d  

^a Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d KYOTO PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^e Reinan Hospital   (Japan)

^f Yashio Hospital   (Japan)

^g Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology   (Japan)

^h KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

ⁱ Hanazono University   (Japan)

Author keywords

CLOX; dementia; Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; Spearman's g;

Indexed keywords

CLOCK DRAWING TEST; COHORT ANALYSIS; CULTURAL FACTOR; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMENTIA; DEMENTIA ASSESSMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HUMAN; JAPANESE (PEOPLE); LINGUISTICS; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; VALIDATION STUDY; AGED; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; COMPLICATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TEXAS; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; COHORT STUDIES; CULTURE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; MIDDLE AGED; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; TEXAS;

EID: 84948680649     PISSN: 13872877     EISSN: 18758908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150261     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Royall DR, Palmer RF, O'Bryant SE (2012) Validation of a latent variable representing the dementing process. J Alzheimers Dis 30, 639-649.
2. Royall DR, Matsuoka T, Palmer RF, Kato Y, Taniguchi S, OgawaM, Fujimoto H, Okamura A, Shibata K, Nakamura K, Uchida H, Nakaaki S, Koumi H, Mimura M, Fukui K, Narumoto J (2015) Greater than the sum of its parts: ä Improves upon a battery's diagnostic performance. Neuropsychology 29, 683-692.
3. Hughes CP, Begr L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL (1982) A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 140, 566-572.
4. Royall DR, Palmer RF, Vidoni ED, Honea RA, Burns JM (2012) The Default Mode Network and related right hemisphere structures may be the key substrates of dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 32, 467-478.
5. Royall DR, Palmer RF (2013) Validation of a latent construct for dementia case-finding in Mexican-Americans. J Alzheimers Dis 37, 89-97.
6. Gavett BE, Vudy V, JeffreyM, John SE, Gurnani A, Adams J (2015) The δ latent dementia phenotype in the NACC UDS: Cross-validation and extension. Neuropsychology 29, 344-352.
7. Royall DR, Cordes JA, Polk M (1998) CLOX: An executive clock drawing task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64, 588-594.
8. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Mchugh PR (1975) 'Mini-mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12, 189-198.
9. Royall DR, Mahurin RK, GrayKF(1992) Bedside assessment of executive cognitive impairment: The executive interview. J Am Geriatr Soc 40, 1221-1226.
10. Matsuoka T, Kato Y, Taniguchi S, Ogawa M, Fujimoto H, Okamura A, Shibata K, Nakamura K, Uchida H, Nakaaki S, Koumi H, Mimura M, Fukui K, Narumoto J (2014) Japanese versions of the Executive Interview (J-EXIT25) and the Executive Clock Drawing Task (J-CLOX) for elderly people. Int Psychogeriatr 26, 1387-1397.
11. Waring S, O'Bryant SE, Reisch JS, Diaz-Arrastia R, Knebl J, Doody R, for the Texas Alzheimer's Research, Consortium (2008) The Texas Alzheimer's Research Consortium longitudinal research cohort: Study design and baseline characteristics. Texas Pub Health J 60, 9-13.
12. McKhann D, Drockman D, Folstein MR, Price D, StadlanEM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group. Neurology 34, 939-944.
13. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9, 179-186.
14. Royall DR, Mulroy A, Chiodo LK, Polk MJ (1999) Clock drawing is sensitive to executive control: A comparison of six methods. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 54B, P328-P333.
15. Benton A, Hamsher K (1989) Multilingual Aphasia Examination. AJA Associates, Iowa City, Iowa.
16. Wechsler D (1997) Wechsler Memory Scale, Third Edition. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
17. Reitan RM (1958) Validity of the Trail-Making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 8, 271-276.
18. Sugishita M (2012) Mini Mental State Examination-Japanese, Nihon Bunka Kagakusha Company, Tokyo.
19. Arbuckle JL (2006) Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer Program], SPSS, Chicago.
20. Grice JW (2001) Computing and evaluation factor scores. Psychol Methods 6, 430-450.
21. Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002) Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7, 147-177.
22. Graham JW (2009) Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Ann Rev Psychol 6, 549-576.
23. Wheaton B, Muthen B, AlwinDF, SummerGF(1977) Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In Sociology Methodology, Heise DR, ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
24. Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107, 238-246.
25. Browne M, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models, Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 136-162.
26. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Sem Nuc Med 8, 283-298.
27. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39, 561-577.
28. A2009) PASW Statistics 18, Release Version 18.0.0, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL.
29. Guttman L (1955) The determinancy of factor score matrices with applications for five other problems of common factor theory. Br J Stat Psychol 8, 65-82.
30. BeauducelA(2007) In spite of indeterminancymanycommon factor score estimates yield an identical reproduced covariance matrix. Psychometrika 72, 437-441.
31. Llabre MM, Fitzpatrick SL (2012) Revisiting measurement models in psychosomatic medicine research:Alatent variable approach. Psychosom Med 74, 169-177.
32. Royall DR, Palmer RF, Vidoni ED, Honea RA (2013) The default mode network may be the key substrate of depression related cognitive changes. J Alzheimers Dis 34, 547-560.
33. Royall DR, Bishnoi R, Palmer RF (2015) Serum IGF-BP2 strongly moderates age's effect on cognition: AMIMIC analysis. Neurobiol Aging 36, 2232-2240.
34. Gold DA (2012) An examination of instrumental activities of daily living assessment in older adults and mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 34, 11-34.
35. Royall DR, Palmer RF (2014) Does ethnicity moderate dementia's biomarkers? Neurobiol Aging 35, 336-344.
36. Palmer RF, Royall, DR (2015) Future dementia severity is almost entirely explained by the latent variable ä's intercept and slope. J Alzheimers Dis 49, 521-529.