Using graph patterns to extract scenarios

Proceedings - IEEE Workshop on Program Comprehension

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 239-247

  Wu, Jingwei ^a   Hassan, A E ^a   Holt, R C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer architecture; Computer science; Data mining; Documentation; Pattern matching; Reverse engineering; Software architecture; Software systems; Systems engineering and theory; Utility programs

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; DATA MINING; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; PATTERN MATCHING; REVERSE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; SYSTEM PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION; UTILITY PROGRAMS;

GRAPH PATTERNS; OPEN SOURCES; SEMI-AUTOMATICS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPER; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; SOURCE CODES; SUPPORT GRAPHS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND THEORIES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 84948668702     PISSN: 10928138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WPC.2002.1021345     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. G. C. Murphy, D. Notkin and K. Sullivan. Software Reflexion Models: Bridging the Gap between Source and High-Level Models. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 18-28, Washington, D.C., October 1995.
2. I. T. Bowman, R. C. Holt and N. V. Brewster. Linux as a Case Study: It Extracted Software Architecture. In Proc. of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, Los Angeles, California, May 1999.
3. R. Kazman, G. Abowd, L. Bass and P. Clements. Scenario-Based Analysis of Software Architectur. IEEE Software, 13(6):47-55, 1996.
4. P. Kruchten. The "4+1" View Model of Architecture. IEEE Software, 12(6):42-50, November 1995.
5. M. Fowler and K. Scott. UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
6. Nautilus. http://nautilus.eazel.com, June 2001.
7. GNOME. http://www.gnome.org, January 2002.
8. H. Zimmermann. OSI Reference Model - the ISO Model of Architecture for Open Systems Interconnection. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 28(4):425-432, 1980
9. R. C. Holt. Software Architecture Abstraction and Aggregation as Algebraic Manipulations. In Proc. of CASCON'99, Toronto, Canada, November 1999.
10. The Portble Bookshelf. http://www.swag.uwaterloo.ca/pbs, September 2001.
11. The GTK+ Online Reference. http://www.gtk.org, January 2002.
12. H. Müller, O. Mehmet, S. Tilley and J. Uhl. A Reverse Engineering Approach to Subsystem Structure Identification. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, Vol. 5(4), pp. 181-204, December 1993.
13. W. F. Clocksin and C. S. Mellish. Programming in Prolog, 4th edition. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
14. GNU Prolog, version 1.2.8. http://pauillac.inria.fr/ diaz/gnu-prolog, October 2001.
15. XPCE/SWI Prolog, version 5. http://www.swi-prolog.org, April 2002.
16. G. Y. Guo, J. M. Atlee and R. Kazman. A Software Architecture Reconstruction Method. In Proc. of the 1st IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 15-33, San Antonio, Texas, February 1999.
17. D. Jerding, J. Stasko and T. Ball. Visualizing Interactions in Program Executions. In Proc. of ICSE'97, pp.360-370, Boston, Massachusetts, May 1997.
18. D. Jerding and S. Rugaber. Using Visualizatin for Architectural Localization and Extraction. In Proc. of the 4th WCRE, pp.56-65, Amsterdam, Netherland, October 1997.
19. T. Systä. Understanding the Behavior of Java Programs. In Proc. of the 7th WCRE, Brisbane, Australia, November 2000.
20. C. Pal. A Technique for Illustrating Dynamic Component Level Interactions Within a Software Architecture. In Proc. of CASCON'98, pp. 134-146, Toronto, Canada, November 1998.