Lab testing of Ni-MH battery packs on four different hybrid control strategies to evaluate life and performance

Proceedings of the Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 241-246

  Zahner, R ^a   Roden, K ^a   Warf, B ^b   MacDougall, R ^b  

^a Air Force Materiel Command   (United States)

^b Sacramento Municipal Utility District   (United States)

Author keywords

Battery powered vehicles; Bismuth; Costs; Fuel economy; Hybrid electric vehicles; Life testing; Nickel; Throughput; Watches; Weapons

Indexed keywords

BISMUTH; CHARGING (BATTERIES); COSTS; ELECTRIC BATTERIES; FUEL ECONOMY; HYBRID VEHICLES; HYDRIDES; NICKEL; NICKEL METAL HYDRIDE BATTERIES; ORDNANCE; SECONDARY BATTERIES; THROUGHPUT; WATCHES;

BATTERY POWERED; CAPACITY FADE; CONTRIBUTING FACTOR; HYBRID CONTROL STRATEGIES; LIFE-TESTING; NICKEL METAL HYDRIDE; STATE OF CHARGE; TEST METHODOLOGY;

BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84948660028     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BCAA.2002.986407     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. USABC Electric Vehicle Battery Test Procedures Manual; DOE/ID-10479; Revision 2, January 1996
2. PNGV Battery Test Manual; DOE/ID-10597; Revision 1, May 1998
3. Hybrid Control Strategy Evaluation; Final Report for Phase 2; Battery M.D., Inc. and SMUD; July 2001
4. SAE Handbook; SAE J1376; Volume 4:36.31; 1991