Approximate information filtering on the semantic web

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2479, Issue , 2002, Pages 114-128

  Stuckenschmidt, Heiner ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB;

APPROXIMATE REASONING; CONTENT-BASED INFORMATION; CONVENTIONAL APPROACH; CORRECTNESS PROOFS; IMPRECISE INFORMATION; INFORMATION SOURCES; INTELLIGENT TECHNIQUES; TEXT-BASED RETRIEVAL;

INFORMATION FILTERING;

EID: 84948410471     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45751-8_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. N.J. Belkin and B.W. Croft. Information filtering and information retrieval: Two sides ofthe same coin? Communications of the ACM, 35(12):29–38, December 1992.
2. Diego Calvanese, Giuseppe De Giacomo, and Maurizio Lenzerini. A framework for ontology integration. In Proceedings of the international semantic web working symposium, Stanford, USA, 2001.
3. Diego Calvanesea, Giuseppe De Giacomo, and Maurizio Lenzerini. Description logics for information integration. In Computational Logic: From Logic Programming into the Future, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 2001.
4. K.C.-C. Chang and H. Garcia-Molina. Approximate query mapping: Accounting for translation closeness. The VLDBJournal, 10:155–181, 2001.
5. K. C.-C. Chang, H. Garcia-Molina, and A. Paepcke. Boolean query mapping across heterogeneous information sources. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 8(4), 1996.
6. William B. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates. Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms. Prentice-HALL, North Virginia, 1992.
7. R. Gaizauskas and K. Humphreys. Using a semantic network for informationextraction. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, 1997.
8. Volker Haarslev and Ralf Moller. Description ofthe RACER system and its applications. In Proceedings of the Description Logics Worlshop DL-2001, Stanford, CA, 2001.
9. Michel Klein. Combining and relating ontologies: An analysis ofproblems and solutions. In Ontologies and information sharing, number 47, Seattle, USA, August 2001.
10. Yannis Papakonstantinou, Ashish Gupta, and Laura Haas. Capabilities-based query rewriting in mediator systems. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Information Systems, Miami Beach, Flor., 1996.
11. G. Salton and M.J. McGill. Introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw- Hill, 1983.
12. B. Selman and H. Kautz. Knowledge compilation and theory approximation. Journal of the ACM, 43(2):193–224, March 1996.
13. H. Stuckenschmidt and F. van Harmelen. Ontology-based metadata generation from semi-structured information. In Proceedings of the first intenational conference on knowledge capture (K-CAP’01). Sheridan Printing, 2001.
14. Frank van Harmelen, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Ian Horrocks. A modeltheoreticsemantics for daml+oil (march 2001).
15. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/model-theoretic-semantics.html, march 2001.
16. Frank van Harmelen, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Ian Horrocks. Reference description ofthe daml+oil (march 2001) ontology markup language. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.html, march 2001.
17. Pepjijn R. S. Visser, Dean M. Jones, T. J. M. Bench-Capon, and M. J. R. Shave. An analysis ofon tological mismatches: Heterogeneity versus interoperability. In AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering, Stanford, USA, 1997.
18. David Yarowsky. Word-sense disambiguation using statistical models ofRoget’s categories trained on large corpora. In Proceedings of COLING-92, pages 454–460, Nantes, France, 1992.