Performance evaluation of mobile-agent middleware: A Hierarchical approach

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2240, Issue , 2001, Pages 244-259

  Dikaiakos, Marios ^a   Kyriakou, Melinos ^a   Samaras, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDDLEWARE;

EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS; HIERARCHICAL APPROACH; MIDDLEWARE PLATFORMS; MOBILE AGENT PLATFORM; MOBILE AGENT SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; TYPICAL STRUCTURES;

MOBILE AGENTS;

EID: 84948180303     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45647-3_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Y. Aridov and D. Lange. Agent Design Patterns: Elements of Agent Application Design. In Proceedings of Autonomous Agents 1998, pages 108–115. ACM, 1998.
2. M. Breugst, I. Busse, S. Covaci, and T. Magedanz. Grasshopper – A Mobile Agent Platform for IN Based Service Environments. In Proceedings of IEEE IN Workshop 1998, pages 279–290, Bordeaux, France, May 1998.
3. T. Budd. Understanding Object-Oriented Programming with JAVA. Addison- Wesley, 2000.
4. D. Lange and M. Oshima. Programming and Deploying Java Mobile Agents with Aglets. Addison Wesley, 1998.
5. M. Dikaiakos, M. Kyriacou, and G. Samaras. Benchmarking Mobile-agent Systems. Technical Report TR-01-2, Department of Computer Science, University of Cyprus, May 2001.
6. M. Dikaiakos and G. Samaras. A Performance Analysis Framework for Mobile- Agent Platforms. In Wagner and Rana, editors, Infrastructure for Agents, Multi- Agent Systems, and Scaleable Multi-Agent Systems, volume 1887 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2001.
7. G. Glass. Overviewof Voyager: ObjectSpace’s Product Family for State-of-the-Art Distributed Computing. Technical report, ObjectSpace, 1999.
8. R. Koblick. Concordia. Communications of the ACM, 42(3):96–99, March 1999.
9. D. B. Lange and M. Oshima. Seven Good Reasons for Mobile Agents. Communications of the ACM, 42(3):88–91, March 1999.
10. Mitsubishi Electric ITA. Concordia Developer’s Guide, October 1998. http://www.meitca.com/HSL/Projects/Concordia.
11. ObjectSpace. ObjectSpace Voyager, General Magic Odyssey, IBM Aglets. A Comparison. ObjectSpace, June 1997.
12. G. Samaras, M. Dikaiakos, C. Spyrou, and A. Liverdos. Mobile Agent Platforms for Web-Databases: A Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment. In Proceedings of the Joint Symposium ASA/MA ’ 99. First International Symposium on Agent Systems and Applications (ASA ’99). Third International Symposium on Mobile Agents (MA ’99), pages 50–64. IEEE-Computer Society, October 1999.
13. D. Wong, N. Paciorek, T. Walsh, J. DiCelie, M. Young, and B. Peet. Concordia: An Infrastructure for Collaborating Mobile Agents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1219, 1997. http://www.meitca.com/HSL/Projects/Concordia/.
14. M. Woodside. Software Performance Evaluation by Models. In C. Lindemann G. Haring and M. Reiser, editors, Performance Evaluation: Origins and Directions, LNCS. State of the Art Survey, pages 283–304. Springer, 1999.