Development of a real-time smartphone solution for the management of women with or at high risk of gestational diabetes

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1105-1114

  Mackillop, Lucy ^a   Loerup, Lise ^b   Bartlett, Katy ^a   Farmer, Andrew ^b   Gibson, Oliver J ^b   Hirst, Jane E ^a   Kenworthy, Yvonne ^a   Kevat, Dev A ^a   Levy, Jonathan C ^a   Tarassenko, Lionel ^b  

^a JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complex intervention development; Digital health; Gestational diabetes; Self monitoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIABETES CONTROL; FEMALE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MOBILE APPLICATION; MOBILE PHONE; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANT WOMAN; TELEHEALTH; ADULT; BLOOD; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICES; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; TELEMEDICINE;

ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CELL PHONES; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84948132405     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296814542271     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. World Health Organization and Department of Noncommunicable Disease Surveillance. Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications. Report of a WHO Consultation. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1999.
2. Hod M, Rabinerson D, Peled Y. Gestational diabetes mellitus: is it a clinical entity? Diabetes Rev. 1995;3(4):602-613.
3. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2477-2486.
4. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1339-1348.
5. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Diabetes in Pregnancy. Management of Diabetes and Its Complications From Preconception to the Postnatal Period. London, UK; 2008. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/CG63.
6. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:676-682.
7. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Scientific Impact Paper 23. Diabetes and Treatment of Gestational Diabetes. 2011. Available at: http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-files/SIP-No-23.pdf.
8. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, et al. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabetic Med. 2011;28:455-463.
9. Larsen ME, Turner J, Farmer A, Neil A, Tarassenko L. Telemedicine-supported insulin optimisation in primary care. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:433-440.
10. Turner J, Larsen M, Tarassenko L, Neil A, Farmer A. Implementation of telehealth support for patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin treatment: an exploratory study. Inform Prim Care. 2009;17:47-53.
11. Farmer A, Gibson O, Dudley C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of real-time telemedicine support on glycemic control in young adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2697-2702.
12. Wojcicki JM, Ladyzynski P, Krzymien J, et al. What we can really expect from telemedicine in intensive diabetes treatment: results from 3-year study on type 1 pregnant diabetic women. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2001;3(4):581-589.
13. Frost D, Beischer W. Telemedicine in the management of pregnancy in type 1 diabetic women. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(6):863-864.
14. Dalfra MG, Nicolucci A, Lapolla A. The effect of telemedicine on outcome and quality of life in pregnant women with diabetes. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(5):238-242.
15. Homko CJ, Santamore WP, Whiteman V, et al. Use of an Internet-based telemedicine system to manage underserved women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007;9(3):297-306.
16. Kruger DF, White K, Galpern A, et al. Effect of modem transmission of blood glucose data on telephone consultation time, clinic work flow, and patient satisfaction for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2003;15(8):371-375.
17. Homko CJ, Deeb LC, Rohrbacher K, et al. Impact of a telemedicine system with automated reminders on outcomes in women with gestational diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2013;13:1-5.
18. Perez-Ferre N, Galindo M, Fernandez MD, et al. The outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus after a telecare approach are not inferior to traditional outpatient clinic visits. Int J Endocrinol. 2010;2010:386941.
19. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:220.