Experimental and modelling studies of carbon dioxide adsorption by porous biomass derived activated carbon

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1353-1361

  Rashidi, Nor Adilla ^a   Yusup, Suzana ^a   Borhan, Azry ^a   Loong, Lam Hon ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM MALAYSIA CAMPUS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Activation energy; CO2 capture; Flue gas; Pseudo second order model

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; ACTIVATION ENERGY; AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; AGRICULTURAL WASTES; AIR PURIFICATION; BINARY MIXTURES; CARBON DIOXIDE; DIFFUSION IN SOLIDS; FLUE GASES; MORPHOLOGY; PHYSISORPTION; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY;

CARBON DIOXIDE ADSORPTION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; CO2 CAPTURE; INTRA-PARTICLE DIFFUSION; LOW COST ACTIVATED CARBONS; PSEUDO-SECOND ORDER MODEL; REGRESSION COEFFICIENT; TEXTURAL CHARACTERISTIC;

GAS ADSORPTION;

EID: 84948119902     PISSN: 1618954X     EISSN: 16189558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-014-0788-6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allen S, Whitten L, McKay G (1998) The production and characterisation of activated carbons: A review. Dev Chem Eng Miner Process 6: 231-261
2. Ayoob S, Gupta AK, Bhakat PB, Bhat V (2008) Investigations on the kinetics and mechanisms of sorptive removal of fluoride from water using alumina cement granules. Chem Eng J 140: 6-14
3. Basu S, Henshaw PF, Biswas N, Kwan HK (2002) Prediction of gasphase adsorption isotherms using neural nets. Can J Chem Eng 80: 1-7
4. Chouchene A, Jeguirim M, TrouvéG (2013) Biosorption performance, combustion behaviour, and leaching characteristics of olive solid waste during the removal of copper and nickel from aqueous solutions. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi: 10.1007/s10098-013-0680-9
5. Dantas TL, Rodrigues AE, Moreira RF (2012) Separation of carbon dioxide from flue gas using adsorption on porous solids. In: Liu G (Ed) Greenhouse gases: Capturing, utilization and reduction, InTech
6. Elkady MF, Ibrahim AM, El-Latif MMA (2011) Assessment of the adsorption kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic for the potential removal of reactive red dye using eggshell biocomposite beads. Desalin 278: 412-423
7. Hamdan ME, Man N, Yassin SM, D'Silva JL, Shaffril HM (2013) Farmers' adaptive capacity towards the impacts of global warming: A review. Asian Soc Sci 9: 177-184
8. Hileman B (2006) Climate change threatens global economy. Chem Eng News 84: 7-8
9. Ho YS, McKay G (1998) A comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Process Saf Environ Prot 76: 332-340
10. Juttke V, Richter H, Voight I, Prasad RM, Bazarjani MS, Gurlo A, Riedel R (2013) Polymer derived ceramic membranes for gas separation. Chem Eng Trans 32: 1891-1896
11. 2 capture: A mini review. Chem Eng Res Des 90: 1632-1641
12. 2 adsorption using adsorbent modified with piperazine. Chem Eng Trans 35: 403-408
13. Khare P, Kumar A (2012) Removal of phenol from aqueous solution using carbonized Terminalia chebula-activated carbon: Process parametric optimization using conventional method and Taguchi experimental design, adsorption kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic study. Appl Water Sci 2: 317-326
14. Kurane I (2010) The effect of global warming on infectious diseases. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 1: 4-9
15. 2 sorption (Chap. 10). In: Bell DA, Towler BF, Fan M (eds) Coal gasification and its applications, 1st edn. William Andrew, Boston, pp 293-339
16. Li W, Zhang L, Peng J, Li N, Zhu X (2008) Preparation of high surface area activated carbons from tobacco stems with K2CO3 activation using microwave radiation. Ind Crop Prod 27: 341-347
17. Linga P, Kumar R, Englezos P (2007) The clathrate hydrate process for post and pre-combustion capture of carbon dioxide. J Hazard Mater 149: 625-629
18. 2 capture by activated and impregnated anthracites. Fuel Process Technol 86: 1487-1502
19. 2 capture systems. Energy Proced 37: 107-114
20. Meng L, Park S (2012) Investigation of narrow pore size distribution on carbon dioxide capture of nanoporous carbons. Bull Korean Chem Soc 33: 3749-3754
21. Murshid G, Shariff AM, Keong LK, Bustam AM (2011) Thermo physical analysis of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol solvent for carbon dioxide removal. Chem Eng Trans 25: 45-50
22. Özcan A, ÖncüEM, Özcan AS (2006) Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic studies of adsorption of Acid Blue 193 from aqueous solutions onto natural sepiolite. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 277: 90-97
23. 2 adsorbents for postcombustion capture applications. Appl Energy 99: 272-279
24. 2 reduction and production of algal oil using microalgae Nannochloropsis oculata and Tetraselmis chuii. Chem Eng Trans 21: 397-402
25. Rashidi NA, Yusup S, Hameed BH (2013) Kinetic studies on carbon dioxide capture using lignocellulosic based activated carbon. Energy 61: 440-446
26. Renugadevi N, Sangeetha, Lalitha P (2011) Kinetics of the adsorption of methylene blue from an industrial dyeing effluent onto activated carbon prepared from the fruits of Mimusops elengi. Arch Appl Sci Res 3: 492-498
27. Richards J (1995) Control of gaseous emissions: Student manual, APTI Course 415. North Carolina State University, Raleigh
28. Sadaf S, Bhatti HN (2013) Evaluation of peanut husk as a novel, low cost biosorbent for the removal of Indosol Orange RSN dye from aqueous solutions: Batch and fixed bed studies. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi: 10.1007/s10098-013-0653-z
29. Saiwan C, Srisuwanvichein S, Tontiwachwuthikul P (2013) Biopolymer modified with piperazine-2-carboxylic acid for carbon dioxide adsorption. Chem Eng Trans 35: 397-402
30. 2 separation. http://www.fischertropsch. org/DOE/DOE-reports/40823/40823-final/40823-final.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2013
31. Wang Y, Liu B, Zheng C (2010) Preparation and adsorption properties of corncob-derived activated carbon with high surface area. J Chem Eng Data 55: 4669-4676
32. 2 capture by phenolic resin-based activated carbon spheres. J Mater Chem A 1: 112-116
33. Winters WJ, Dugan B, Collett TS (2008) Physical properties of sediments from Keathley Canyon and Atwater Valley, JIP Gulf of Mexico gas hydrate drilling program. Mar Pet Geol 25: 896-905
34. 2 capture by vacuum swing adsorption with activated carbon. J Fuel Chem Technol 39: 169-174
35. 2 capture with vacuum swing adsorption using activated carbon. Chem Eng J 230: 64-72