Automated Patent Categorization and Guided Patent Search using IPC as Inspired by MeSH and PubMed

Journal of Biomedical Semantics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Eisinger, Daniel ^a,b   Tsatsaronis, George ^a   Bundschus, Markus ^b   Wieneke, Ulrich ^b   Schroeder, Michael ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948117428     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-4-S1-S3     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Blackmail M: WIPO News. World Patent Information. 2012, 34 (2): 168-170. 10.1016/j.wpi.2012.01.007.
2. World Intellectual Property Report 2011. 2012, [ http://www.wipo.int/econ_stat/en/economics/wipr/ ]
3. World Intellectual Property Organization. [ http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.en ]
4. Vijvers W: The International Patent Classification as a Search Tool. World Patent Information. 1990, 12: 26-30. 10.1016/0172-2190(90)90285-S.
5. Adams S: Using the International Patent Classification in an Online Environment. World Patent Information. 2000, 22 (4): 291-300. 10.1016/S0172-2190(00)00073-9.
6. International Patent Classification. [ http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en ]
7. Harris CG, Arens R, Srinivasan P: Comparison of IPC and USPC Classification Systems in Patent Prior Art Searches. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Patent Information Retrieval. 2010, ACM, 27-32.
8. File Index. [ http://www5.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/pmgs1/pmgs1/pmgs_E ]
9. Deutsche Feinklassifikation. [ http://depatisnet.dpma.de/ipc/language.do?lang=EN ]
10. Cooperative Patent Classification. [ http://www.cooperativepatentclassification.org/index.html ]
11. Doms A, Schroeder M: GoPubMed: Exploring PubMed with the Gene Ontology. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005, 33: 783-786. 10.1093/nar/gki470.
12. Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Kirsch H, Arregui M, Gaudan S, Riethoven M, Stoehr P: EBIMed-Text Crunching to Gather Facts for Proteins from Medline. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (2): 237-244. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl302.
13. Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Arregui M, Gaudan S, Kirsch H, Jimeno A: Text Processing through Web Services: Calling Whatizit. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24 (2): 296-298. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm557.
14. Trieschnigg D, Pezik P, Lee V, de Jong F, Kraaij W, Rebholz-Schuhmann D: MeSH Up: Effective MeSH Text Classification for Improved Document Retrieval. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (11): 1412-1418. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp249.
15. Tsatsaronis G, Macari N, Torge S, Dietze H, Schroeder M: A Maximum-Entropy Approach for Accurate Document Annotation in the Biomedical Domain. Journal of Biomedical Semantics. 2012, 3: S2-
16. Lu Z, Kim W, Wilbur WJ: Evaluation of Query Expansion Using MeSH in PubMed. Information Retrieval. 2009, 12: 69-80. 10.1007/s10791-008-9074-8.
17. Gurulingappa H, Müller B, Klinger R, Mevissen H, Hofmann-Apitius M, Fluck J, Friedrich C: Patent Retrieval in Chemistry based on Semantically Tagged Named Entities. The Eighteenth Text RETrieval Conference (TREC 2009) Proceedings. 2009
18. Alberts D, Yang C, Fobare-DePonio D, Koubek K, Robins S, Rodgers M, Simmons E, DeMarco D: Introduction to Patent Searching. Current Challenges in Patent Information Retrieval. 2011, 29: 3-43. 10.1007/978-3-642-19231-9_1.
19. Paranjpe PP: Patent Information and Search. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology. 2012, 32 (3): [ http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/djlit/article/view/2375 ]
20. Annies M: Best Practice in Search and Analysis of Chemical Formulations: From Chemical Recipes to Complex Formulation Types and Dosage Forms. World Patent Information. 2012, 34 (3): 206-212. 10.1016/j.wpi.2012.03.003.
21. Parisi C, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, Thangaraj H: Analysing Patent Landscapes in Plant Biotechnology and New Plant Breeding Techniques. Transgenic Research. 2013, 22: 15-29. 10.1007/s11248-012-9641-z.
22. Becks D, Womser-Hacker C, Mandl T, Kölle R: Patent Retrieval Experiments in the Context of the CLEF IP Track 2009. Multilingual Information Access Evaluation I - Text Retrieval Experiments Proceedings of CLEF 2009. 2010, 491-496. [ http://clef.isti.cnr.it/2009/working_notes/becks-paperCLEF2009.pdf ]
23. Szarvas G, Herbert B, Gurevych I: Prior Art Search using International Patent Classification Codes and All-Claims-Queries. Working Notes of the 10th Workshop of the Cross Language Evaluation Forum. 2009
24. Krier M, Zacca F: Automatic Categorisation Applications at the European Patent Office. World Patent Information. 2002, 24 (3): 187-196. 10.1016/S0172-2190(02)00026-1.
25. Fall CJ, Benzineb K: Literature survey: Issues to be Considered in the Automatic Classification of Patents. World Intellectual Property Organization. 2002, 29:
26. Fall CJ, Törcsvári A, Benzineb K, Karetka G: Automated Categorization in the International Patent Classification. SIGIR Forum. 2003, 37: 10-25. 10.1145/945546.945547.
27. Iwayama M, Fujii A, Kando N: Overview of Classification Subtask at NTCIR-5 Patent Retrieval Task. Proceedings of NTCIR-5 Workshop Meeting. 2005
28. Piroi F, Tait J: CLEF-IP 2010: Retrieval Experiments in the Intellectual Property Domain. Proceedings of CLEF 2010. 2010
29. Trappey A, Hsu F, Trappey C, Lin C: Development of a Patent Document Classification and Search Platform using a Back-Propagation Network. Expert Systems with Applications. 2006, 31 (4): 755-765. 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.013.
30. Tikk D, Biró G, Törcsvári A: A Hierarchical Online Classifier for Patent Categorization. Emerging Technologies of Text Mining: Techniques and Applications. IGI Global. 2008
31. Verberne S, Vogel M, D'hondt E: Patent Classification Experiments with the Linguistic Classification System LCS. Proceedings of the Conference on Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access Evaluation (CLEF2010),CLEF-IPWorkshop. 2010
32. Chen YL, Chang YC: A Three-Phase Method for Patent Classification. Information Processing & Management. 2012, 48 (6): 1017-1030. 10.1016/j.ipm.2011.11.001. [ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457311001117 ]
33. Coletti MH, Bleich HL: Medical Subject Headings Used to Search the Biomedical Literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2001, 8 (4): 317-323. 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080317.
34. Darmoni SJ, Soualmia LF, Letord C, Jaulent MC, Griffon N, Thirion B, Névéol A: Improving Information Retrieval using Medical Subject Headings Concepts: a Test Case on Rare and Chronic Diseases. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2012, 100 (3): 176-183. 10.3163/1536-5050.100.3.007.
35. Makarov M: The Process of Reforming the International Patent Classification. World Patent Information. 2004, 26 (2): 137-141. 10.1016/j.wpi.2004.01.003.
36. Adams S: Comparing the IPC and the US Classification Systems for the Patent Searcher. World Patent Information. 2001, 23: 15-23. 10.1016/S0172-2190(00)00110-1.
37. Wongel H, Farassopoulos A: Changes to the IPC Effective from January 2011. World Patent Information. 2012, 34: 4-7. 10.1016/j.wpi.2011.09.003.
38. Shah PK, Perez-Iratxeta C, Bork P, Andrade MA: Information Extraction from Full Text Scientific Articles: Where are the Keywords?. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003, 4: 20-10.1186/1471-2105-4-20.
39. Schuemie M, Weeber M, Schijvenaars B, Van Mulligen E, Van Der Eijk C, Jelier R, Mons B, Kors J: Distribution of Information in Biomedical Abstracts and Full-Text Publications. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20 (16): 2597-2604. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth291.
40. EspaceNet - Homepage. [ http://worldwide.espacenet.com ]
41. Google Patents. [ http://www.google.com/?tbm=pts ]
42. FreePatentsOnline. [ http://www.freepatentsonline.com ]
43. IPCCAT. [ https://www3.wipo.int/ipccat ]
44. MeSH 2012 File Downloads. [ http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/filelist.html ]
45. International Patent Classification HTML files. [ http://www.wipo.int/ipc/itos4ipc/ITSupport_and_download_area/20060101/subclass/advanced/en/ ]
46. European Patent Office Subscription Product 14.12. [ http://www.epo.org/searching/subscription/raw/product-14-12.html ]
47. Rosenfeld R: A Maximum Entropy Approach to Adaptive Statistical Language Modelling. Computer Speech and Language. 1996, 10 (3): 187-228. 10.1006/csla.1996.0011.
48. Ratnaparkhi A, etal: A Maximum Entropy Model for Part-of-Speech Tagging. Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 1996, 133-142.
49. Nigam K, Lafferty J, McCallum A: Using Maximum Entropy for Text Classification. IJCAI-99 workshop on machine learning for information filtering. 1999, 61-67.
50. McCallum AK: MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. 2002, [ http://mallet.cs.umass.edu ]