Talking about climate change and global warming

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Lineman, Maurice ^a   Do, Yuno ^a   Kim, Ji Yoon ^a   Joo, Gea Jae ^a  

^a Pusan National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSCIOUSNESS; DRIVER; EXPOSURE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MASS MEDIUM; NOMENCLATURE; PERCEPTION; PREVALENCE; PUBLIC OPINION; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CLIMATE CHANGE; GLOBAL WARMING; HUMANS; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84947996819     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138996     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Motteux NMG. Evaluating people-environment relationships: developing appropriate research methodologies for sustainable management and 2003.
2. Castle NG, Brown J, Hepner KA, Hays RD. Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients' perceptions of care. Health Services Research. 2005; 40(6p2):1996-2017.
3. Weingart P, Engels A, Pansegrau P. Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science. 2000; 9(3):261-83.
4. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems. 2000; 47(4):499-522.
5. Ripberger JT. Capturing curiosity: Using internet search trends to measure public attentiveness. Policy Studies Journal. 2011; 39(2):239-59.
6. Chadwick A. The Political information cycle in a hybrid news system: the British Prime Minister and the "Bullygate" Affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2011; 16(1):3-29.
7. Abeywardena IS. Public opinion on OER and MOCC: a sentiment analysis of twitter data. 2014.
8. Choi Y, Cardie C, editors. Learning with compositional semantics as structural inference for subsentential sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing; 2008: Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Wiegand M, Balahur A, Roth B, Klakow D, Montoyo A, editors. A survey on the role of negation in sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the workshop on negation and speculation in natural language processing; 2010: Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Nasukawa T, Yi J, editors. Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture; 2003: ACM.
11. Eagle N, Pentland A. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2006; 10(4):255-68.
12. Bossomaier T. Complexity: Metrics and modules. Advances in Complex Systems. 2003; 6(3):313-29.
13. De Longueville B, Smith RS, Luraschi G, editors. Omg, from here, i can see the flames!: a use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires. Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on location based social networks; 2009: ACM.
14. Whitmarsh L, O'Neill S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010; 30:305-14.
15. Roberts ML, Hite PA, Bradley CF. Understanding attitudes toward progressive taxation. Public Opin Q. 1994; 58(2):165-90.
16. Rigg R, Findo S, Wechselberger M, Gorman ML, Sillero-Zubiri C, et al. Mitigating carnivore-livestock conflict in Europe: lessons from Slovakia. Oryx. 2011; 45(2):272-80.
17. Miksza P, Roeder M, Biggs D. Surveying Colorado Band Directors' Opinions of Skills and Characteristics Important to Successful Music Teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education. 2010; 57(4):364-81.
18. Choi H, Varian H. Predicting the present with google trends. Economic Record 2012; 88:2-9.
19. Granka L. Inferring the public agenda from implicit query data. Understanding the User-Logging and Interpreting User Interactions in Information Search and Retrieval (UIIR-2009). 2009: 28.
20. Do Y, Kim JY, Lineman M, Kim DK, Joo GJ. Using internet search behavior to assess public awareness of protected wetlands. Conservation Biology. 2015; 29(1):271-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12419 PMID: 25412014
21. Kim JY, Do Y, Im R-Y, Kim G-Y, Joo G-J. Use of large web-based data to identify public interest and trends related to endangered species. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2014; 23(12):2961-84.
22. Aston N, Liddle J, Hu W. Twitter sentiment in data streams with perceptron. Journal of Computer and Communications. 2014; 2014(2):11-6.
23. Wang X, Wei F, Liu X, Zhou M, Zhang M, editors. Topic sentiment analysis in twitter: a graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management; 2011: ACM.
24. Kouloumpis E, Wilson T, Moore J. Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! ICWSM. 2011; 11:538-41.
25. Mobley C, Vagias WM, DeWard SL. Exploring additional determinants of environmentally responsible behavior: The influence of environmental literature and environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior. 2009.
26. Bollen J, Pepe A, Mao H. Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. arXiv preprint arXiv:09111583. 2009.
27. Zhao D, Rosson MB, editors. How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work; 2009: ACM.
28. Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM. The use of Twitterto track levels of disease activity and public concern in the US during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One. 2011; 6(5):e19467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019467 PMID: 21573238
29. Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011; 13(4).
30. Phelan O, McCarthy K, Smyth B, editors. Using twitterto recommend real-time topical news. Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems; 2009: ACM.
31. Bruns A, Burgess J. #ausvotes: How Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. 2011.
32. Pinkerton B, editor Finding what people want: Experiences with the Web Crawler. Proceedings of the Second International World Wide Web Conference; 1994: Chicago.
33. Hölscher C, Strube G. Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks. 2000; 33(1):337-46.
34. Fayyad UM, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P, editors. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: Towards a Unifying Framework. KDD; 1996.
35. Fayyad U, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P. From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. Ai Magazine. 1996; 17(3):37.
36. Lawrence L. Reliability of Sentiment Mining Tools: A comparison of Semantria and Social Mention. 2014.
37. Proulx R, Massicotte P, Pepino M. Googling trends in conservation biology. Conservation Biology. 2014; 28(1):44-51. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12131 PMID: 24033767
38. Cavnar WB, Trenkle JM. N-gram-based text categorization. Ann Arbor MI. 1994; 48113(2):161-75.
39. Conway M, Doan S, Kawazoe A, Collier N. Classifying disease outbreak reports using n-grams and semantic features. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2009; 78(12):e47-e58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.010 PMID: 19447070
40. Pettitt AN. A Non-Parametric Approach to the Change-Point Problem. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics). 1979; 28(2):126-35. doi: 10.2307/2346729
41. Nisbet MC. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2009; 51(2):12-23.
42. Moser SC. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2010; 1(1):31-53. doi: 10.1002/wcc.11
43. Neverla I, editor The IPCC-reports 1990-2007 in the media. A case-study on the dialectics between journalism and natural sciences. ICA-Conference, Global Communication and Social Change, Montreal: International Communications Association; 2008.
44. Giddens A. The politics of climate change. Cambridge, UK. 2009.
45. Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change. 2006; 77(1-2):45-72.
46. Doherty TJ, Clayton S. The Psychological Impacts of Global Climate Change. 2011.
47. Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Read D. What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis. 1994; 14(6):959-70.
48. Fredrickson BL. What good are positive emotions? Review of general psychology. 1998; 2(3):300. PMID: 21850154
49. Fredickson B. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American psychologist. 2001; 56(3):218-26. PMID: 11315248
50. Grothmann T, Patt A. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change. 2005; 15(3):199-213.
51. Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation: Oxford University Press; 1991.
52. Welch DD. Ruling with the heart: Emotion-based public policy. S Cal Interdisc LJ. 1997; 6:55.